*HTML is OFF *UBB Code is ON Smilies Legend
Smilies Legend
If you have previously registered, but forgotten your password, click here.
T O P I C R E V I E WTravelmanAt the bottom of the report are three numbersMine are 1972, -578 and 1394.I would guess that 1972 are the total number of points of all of the traits regardless of the traits being negative or positive.-578 is the total points for negative traits. (-209 just for moon square moon, so not a lot of negative stuff in our chart).1394 is the total points for positive traits.Anyway, for anyone who knows cafe astrology, is 1394 a good score? What is average? In the end, what does it mean? Obviously, in the end, relationships are in our own hands and the charts serve merely as a blueprint for the two to act on accordingly, but I still wonder, especially about this 1394.(This score is with my current gf).TravelmanAh, I seehttps://cafeastrology.com/compatibility-report-scores.htmlNumbers over 1200, in any of the three columns, are considered very high and significant.So, that 1394 is quite nice for example. We have a lot of deep connections as the total of 1972 shows. We do have a deep connection so far.GalacticCoreExplosion Tbh, I haven't found any programs to be particularly accurate or helpful--not that I've tried them all, but the ones I have tried. There is so much information encoded in just one chart alone (let alone comparing two charts) and in a multi layered kind of way, that it would be hard to make a program that is very accurate. And relationships need a certain amount of stressful interaspects as these are what help growth the most. Though, too many squares (especially between fixed energies, both Sign and Planet) can be difficult. Oppositions are often more productive because while there is some friction and tension, it often leads to eventually a more balanced give and take if the two people involved are being relatively mature. And if not, the strong attraction either brings them back together to work on things, or ends up repelling them apart. Hikaru29I didn't find online chart analyses useful. The interpretations are usually abstract and unrelatable. I just did the Star Mate report on cafe astrology and obtained very little useful info from there on how we should relate to each other. Their summary was the only thing I paid attention to though I don't know how they arrived at those percentages. On the contrary I got a better understanding from our vedic readings. MoonMystic Due to my current Mercury Tr, I have no business even reading this topic. I could even have the wrong data. Lower of course -oh well, here's mine.1702 (planets), -596 (orb), 1106 (value)2052 in transits is this similar to the pullen values?Travelman quote:Originally posted by GalacticCoreExplosion: Tbh, I haven't found any programs to be particularly accurate or helpful--not that I've tried them all, but the ones I have tried. There is so much information encoded in just one chart alone (let alone comparing two charts) and in a multi layered kind of way, that it would be hard to make a program that is very accurate. And relationships need a certain amount of stressful interaspects as these are what help growth the most. Though, too many squares (especially between fixed energies, both Sign and Planet) can be difficult. Oppositions are often more productive because while there is some friction and tension, it often leads to eventually a more balanced give and take if the two people involved are being relatively mature. And if not, the strong attraction either brings them back together to work on things, or ends up repelling them apart. Ya, I don't think you will ever find anything that is perfect, but it seems like this Cafe Astrology tool does a decent job, for an automated output, and considers quite a bit. It is useful for those with less money who can not spend a lot, so they can get an OBJECTIVE idea for how the entire synastry looks like and one can go from there.Travelman quote:Originally posted by Hikaru29:I didn't find online chart analyses useful. The interpretations are usually abstract and unrelatable. I just did the Star Mate report on cafe astrology and obtained very little useful info from there on how we should relate to each other. Their summary was the only thing I paid attention to though I don't know how they arrived at those percentages. On the contrary I got a better understanding from our vedic readings. That is a lot of astrology and there is some creativity in finding ways to relate explanations of many different aspects/placements back to yourself. For what it is, a free automated output of two different charts, it is pretty good IMO. MoonMystic quote:Originally posted by Hikaru29:I didn't find online chart analyses useful. The interpretations are usually abstract and unrelatable. I just did the Star Mate report on cafe astrology and obtained very little useful info from there on how we should relate to each other. Their summary was the only thing I paid attention to though I don't know how they arrived at those percentages. On the contrary I got a better understanding from our vedic readings. I agree regarding with Vedic accuracy. When that option was tried, it better reflected my points/angles. But they don't load all the results. I probably saw 25%.Somna7HI have a Doubt.Why it didn't ask for Birth Time ?In a day many born and all are not with same traits.I'm getting following.....637 -457 180Travelman quote:Originally posted by Somna7H:I have a Doubt.Why it didn't ask for Birth Time ?In a day many born and all are not with same traits.I'm getting following.....637 -457 180The one I did asked for birth time and included it in the report.Hikaru29 quote:Originally posted by Travelman: That is a lot of astrology and there is some creativity in finding ways to relate explanations of many different aspects/placements back to yourself. For what it is, a free automated output of two different charts, it is pretty good IMO. IMO if interpretations are not easily relatable then it's subject to a lot of confusion, especially if you've not been in the relationship long enough to have fully experienced it. In the end there may be no real takeaway except some fluffy ideas. That's IME. Also (and this is the same with vedic system), what I learned is the scoring system is just a guide. This is what cafe astrology wrote in their report to me: "The scoring system should serve as a guide rather than hard and fast rules about the nature of a relationship." Hikaru29 quote:Originally posted by MoonMystic: I agree regarding with Vedic accuracy. When that option was tried, it better reflected my points/angles. But they don't load all the results. I probably saw 25%.Try a paid reading. I got so much understanding from my natal reading and it was amazing how much they saw.
Mine are 1972, -578 and 1394.
I would guess that 1972 are the total number of points of all of the traits regardless of the traits being negative or positive.
-578 is the total points for negative traits. (-209 just for moon square moon, so not a lot of negative stuff in our chart).
1394 is the total points for positive traits.
Anyway, for anyone who knows cafe astrology, is 1394 a good score? What is average? In the end, what does it mean? Obviously, in the end, relationships are in our own hands and the charts serve merely as a blueprint for the two to act on accordingly, but I still wonder, especially about this 1394.
(This score is with my current gf).
https://cafeastrology.com/compatibility-report-scores.html
Numbers over 1200, in any of the three columns, are considered very high and significant.
So, that 1394 is quite nice for example. We have a lot of deep connections as the total of 1972 shows. We do have a deep connection so far.
There is so much information encoded in just one chart alone (let alone comparing two charts) and in a multi layered kind of way, that it would be hard to make a program that is very accurate.
And relationships need a certain amount of stressful interaspects as these are what help growth the most. Though, too many squares (especially between fixed energies, both Sign and Planet) can be difficult. Oppositions are often more productive because while there is some friction and tension, it often leads to eventually a more balanced give and take if the two people involved are being relatively mature. And if not, the strong attraction either brings them back together to work on things, or ends up repelling them apart.
1702 (planets), -596 (orb), 1106 (value)
2052 in transits
is this similar to the pullen values?
quote:Originally posted by GalacticCoreExplosion: Tbh, I haven't found any programs to be particularly accurate or helpful--not that I've tried them all, but the ones I have tried. There is so much information encoded in just one chart alone (let alone comparing two charts) and in a multi layered kind of way, that it would be hard to make a program that is very accurate. And relationships need a certain amount of stressful interaspects as these are what help growth the most. Though, too many squares (especially between fixed energies, both Sign and Planet) can be difficult. Oppositions are often more productive because while there is some friction and tension, it often leads to eventually a more balanced give and take if the two people involved are being relatively mature. And if not, the strong attraction either brings them back together to work on things, or ends up repelling them apart.
Ya, I don't think you will ever find anything that is perfect, but it seems like this Cafe Astrology tool does a decent job, for an automated output, and considers quite a bit. It is useful for those with less money who can not spend a lot, so they can get an OBJECTIVE idea for how the entire synastry looks like and one can go from there.
quote:Originally posted by Hikaru29:I didn't find online chart analyses useful. The interpretations are usually abstract and unrelatable. I just did the Star Mate report on cafe astrology and obtained very little useful info from there on how we should relate to each other. Their summary was the only thing I paid attention to though I don't know how they arrived at those percentages. On the contrary I got a better understanding from our vedic readings.
That is a lot of astrology and there is some creativity in finding ways to relate explanations of many different aspects/placements back to yourself. For what it is, a free automated output of two different charts, it is pretty good IMO.
I agree regarding with Vedic accuracy. When that option was tried, it better reflected my points/angles. But they don't load all the results. I probably saw 25%.
quote:Originally posted by Somna7H:I have a Doubt.Why it didn't ask for Birth Time ?In a day many born and all are not with same traits.I'm getting following.....637 -457 180
The one I did asked for birth time and included it in the report.
quote:Originally posted by Travelman: That is a lot of astrology and there is some creativity in finding ways to relate explanations of many different aspects/placements back to yourself. For what it is, a free automated output of two different charts, it is pretty good IMO.
IMO if interpretations are not easily relatable then it's subject to a lot of confusion, especially if you've not been in the relationship long enough to have fully experienced it. In the end there may be no real takeaway except some fluffy ideas. That's IME.
Also (and this is the same with vedic system), what I learned is the scoring system is just a guide. This is what cafe astrology wrote in their report to me: "The scoring system should serve as a guide rather than hard and fast rules about the nature of a relationship."
quote:Originally posted by MoonMystic: I agree regarding with Vedic accuracy. When that option was tried, it better reflected my points/angles. But they don't load all the results. I probably saw 25%.
Try a paid reading. I got so much understanding from my natal reading and it was amazing how much they saw.
Copyright 2000-2023 Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000 Ultimate Bulletin Board Version 5.46a
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000 Ultimate Bulletin Board Version 5.46a