*HTML is OFF *UBB Code is ON Smilies Legend
Smilies Legend
If you have previously registered, but forgotten your password, click here.
T O P I C R E V I E WjwhopNeed I remind you that demoscats took control of the Congress in January 2007...and that's when the stuff started hitting the fan?demoscats have increased the national debt about $5 Trillion since Pee-Lousy and Reid took over and later...O'Bomber.Now, they want to borrow more than $2 Trillion more...and they don't want to reduce spending a penny. In spite of what they now say, that's not what they were saying a few months ago.jwhopNeed I remind you that demoscats took control of the Congress in January 2007...and that's when the stuff started hitting the fan?demoscats have increased the national debt about $5 Trillion since Pee-Lousy and Reid took over and later...O'Bomber.Now, they want to borrow more than $2 Trillion more...and they don't want to reduce spending a penny. In spite of what they now say, that's not what they were saying a few months ago.jwhopWell, I don't know what happened to Node's thread, comments and charts. But, this was my response. katatonicyes the republicans and conservatives love to ignore the fact that a good deal of "obama's debt" was actually carried over and placed on the books that GW somehow couldn't find or didn't know how to write in...but this trend has been going on since the 50s. read buckminster fuller's "critical path", written in 85 and covering the process of establishing government entities paid for by the taxpayer only to be legally syphoned off into the corporate sector for profit...his estimate was that since 1980 no president has really had any option except to manoever within a very SEWN UP environment. AND that since 1980 we have, basically, been broke.i agree, it's not just the white house that should be hearing from us. in fact that is probably the LEAST efficient way to get heard, since they would be so overwhelmed as to be unable to DO anything with the information received...katatoniclol it was here a minute ago..! NODE CAN YOU REPOST??? that was a really good one!and sorry, jwhop, but you only ever use the congressional party as an out when it suits you. reagan worked with democrats and gets all the credit? clinton had repubs on his back so he gets none??????back to the drawing board with you!jwhopSorry..but nothing I said on this thread..whatever thread it is...had anything to do with Reagan or Kommander Korruption.AcousticGodNode's chart is correct. Most of Obama's spending has had something to do with the prior administration.katatonicthe chart is on this thread http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum26/HTML/000853.html i was referring, jwhop, to the fact that you take every opportunity to blame the DEMOCRATIC congress when someone mentions a failure on the part of a REPUBLICAN pres, but you do NOT give them credit when the outcome was better...PLUS it is incredibly naive to say that the election of a bunch of congressmen IMMEDIATELY affects ANYTHING. when the shite started flying they hadn't even had time to DO anything! these things take time to develop, none of it is OVERNIGHT, which is ALSO why you can't blame obama (though i know you will continue to) for the economy diving as he was being sworn in...RandallHate when that happens. Gonna lock this one before it glitches the Forum. Feel free to start a new one.------------------"To avoid criticism, say nothing, do nothing, be nothing." Aristotle
demoscats have increased the national debt about $5 Trillion since Pee-Lousy and Reid took over and later...O'Bomber.
Now, they want to borrow more than $2 Trillion more...and they don't want to reduce spending a penny. In spite of what they now say, that's not what they were saying a few months ago.
But, this was my response.
but this trend has been going on since the 50s. read buckminster fuller's "critical path", written in 85 and covering the process of establishing government entities paid for by the taxpayer only to be legally syphoned off into the corporate sector for profit...his estimate was that since 1980 no president has really had any option except to manoever within a very SEWN UP environment. AND that since 1980 we have, basically, been broke.
i agree, it's not just the white house that should be hearing from us. in fact that is probably the LEAST efficient way to get heard, since they would be so overwhelmed as to be unable to DO anything with the information received...
and sorry, jwhop, but you only ever use the congressional party as an out when it suits you. reagan worked with democrats and gets all the credit? clinton had repubs on his back so he gets none??????
back to the drawing board with you!
i was referring, jwhop, to the fact that you take every opportunity to blame the DEMOCRATIC congress when someone mentions a failure on the part of a REPUBLICAN pres, but you do NOT give them credit when the outcome was better...
PLUS it is incredibly naive to say that the election of a bunch of congressmen IMMEDIATELY affects ANYTHING. when the shite started flying they hadn't even had time to DO anything! these things take time to develop, none of it is OVERNIGHT, which is ALSO why you can't blame obama (though i know you will continue to) for the economy diving as he was being sworn in...
------------------"To avoid criticism, say nothing, do nothing, be nothing." Aristotle
Copyright 2000-2023 Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000 Ultimate Bulletin Board Version 5.46a
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000 Ultimate Bulletin Board Version 5.46a