*HTML is OFF *UBB Code is ON Smilies Legend
Smilies Legend
If you have previously registered, but forgotten your password, click here.
T O P I C R E V I E WRandall http://m.theepochtimes.com/trump-lawyers-opening-argument-majority-in-the-house-afraid-of-facing-trump-in-the-future_3691329.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=b reaking-2021-02-09-3teaselThey aren't afraid of facing him in the future. He tried to overthrow the government. RandallIt was a riot, not an insurrection. You do know about riots, right? You have been cheering them on all last summer.teasel quote:Originally posted by Randall:It was a riot, not an insurrection. You do know about riots, right? You have been cheering them on all last summer.It was both. RandallNo, it was only called an insurrection, because that is mentioned in the Constitution as a reason to prevent running for public office. Why hasn't anyone who stormed the Capitol been charged with insurrection? They were charged with trespassing, property, and related crimes. BlueRoamerIt was an attempted and failed insurrection, and a riotRandallWhen a current leader of BLM actually exploded a bomb in the Capitol to murder Republicans, what was that? Asking for a friend. BTW, she was pardoned by Clinton.This was not an insurrection. That word was only used so Dems could prevent President Trump from running in 2024, which was the real reason for impeachment 2.0! jwhop"This was not an insurrection. That word was only used so Dems could prevent President Trump from running in 2024, which was the real reason for impeachment 2.0!"Agree!It also wasn't an 'impeachment trial'.Had it been an 'impeachment trial', the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court would have presided...as required by the US Constitution.It was an attempt at a Bill of Attainder and Chief Justice Roberts declined to preside.RandallAbsolutely!
quote:Originally posted by Randall:It was a riot, not an insurrection. You do know about riots, right? You have been cheering them on all last summer.
It was both.
This was not an insurrection. That word was only used so Dems could prevent President Trump from running in 2024, which was the real reason for impeachment 2.0!
Agree!
It also wasn't an 'impeachment trial'.Had it been an 'impeachment trial', the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court would have presided...as required by the US Constitution.
It was an attempt at a Bill of Attainder and Chief Justice Roberts declined to preside.
Copyright 2000-2024 Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000 Ultimate Bulletin Board Version 5.46a
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000 Ultimate Bulletin Board Version 5.46a