*HTML is OFF *UBB Code is ON Smilies Legend
Smilies Legend
If you have previously registered, but forgotten your password, click here.
T O P I C R E V I E WRandall http://currently.att.yahoo.com/att/abortions-resume-texas-clinics-judge-034853383.html?.tsrc=daily_mail&uh_test=1_11 RandallCrickets from the peanut gallery?jwhopI'm waiting for states to pass Guardian Ad Litem laws to protect the rights of unborn babies in court proceedings under the 5th Amendment."No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."But, you're right. Only a few days ago, the decision of an Obama appointed judge was being hailed as a breakthrough on the Texas law. Now, when that decision is trashed by a federal appeals court, it's crickets!teasel quote:Originally posted by Randall:Crickets from the peanut gallery?I have a life away from here, you know. Of course you give them a thumbs-up. You don't want to wear a mask, or get vaccinated, but you think you and this country have every right to decide what a woman does with her body. It's disgraceful.But THIS - this "crickets" gets on my bloody nerves, and you know it. Even if you aren't using my name directly. I don't spend much time here, I don't want to, and I don't need to talk about everything. Like you don't know what my reaction would be, by now? It's like a demand for my time, and none of you get to demand that I respond to anything here.teasel quote:Originally posted by jwhop:I'm waiting for states to pass Guardian Ad Litem laws to protect the rights of unborn babies in court proceedings under the 5th Amendment.[b]"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."But, you're right. Only a few days ago, the decision of an Obama appointed judge was being hailed as a breakthrough on the Texas law. Now, when that decision is trashed by a federal appeals court, it's crickets![/B]And what about the sperm in your body? When will the laws protect them whenever a man jacks off, and all of the little sperm die outside of a "host body" (something a degenerate republican called women). And when will you all stop looking down on welfare recipients, and taking things like free lunches away from the children who are actually born? Who are here, and need food, and care, homes, etc. ??RandallNo one mentioned you. No one demanded that you respond to anything. But let’s be clear: You’re damn right I won’t wear a mask. You’re damn right I won’t get vaccinated. But most of all, you’re damn right that I will defend the life of the unborn.HeavenlyLove.shura quote:And what about the sperm in your body? When will the laws protect them whenever a man jacks off, and all of the little sperm die outside of a "host body" (something a degenerate republican called women).Could someone please give teasel the birds and the bees talkteasel http://twitter.com/drlearnalot/status/1446898887646535682?s=21 How many babies are you all willing to take on, once they’re born, if the mother can’t handle it? How many are you going to ensure have a roof over their heads, food, clothes, an education? And how many of you are going to continue to ***** about “welfare mums”? RandallThere are more than enough parents looking to adopt. So, why don’t you find another made-up reason to justify the murder of babies?jwhop quote:Originally posted by Randall:There are more than enough parents looking to adopt. So, why don’t you find another made-up reason to justify the murder of babies?Here's a totally novel idea. Wonder why no one has thought of it before.DON'T GET PREGNANT UNLESS YOU WANT TO RAISE A BABY!!!!!Birth control is under $10 per month or free for low income people.HeavenlyLove.RandallJwhop and I were replying to teasel and to those who callously abort their babies like it’s nothing. HeavenlyLove.RandallAbortions often involve the ripping off of limbs from the fetus, organs and baby parts are sold for experimental purposes, and the far left wants abortion legal up to the moment of birth—so the topic doesn’t lend itself well to sensitivity.
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
But, you're right. Only a few days ago, the decision of an Obama appointed judge was being hailed as a breakthrough on the Texas law. Now, when that decision is trashed by a federal appeals court, it's crickets!
quote:Originally posted by Randall:Crickets from the peanut gallery?
I have a life away from here, you know. Of course you give them a thumbs-up. You don't want to wear a mask, or get vaccinated, but you think you and this country have every right to decide what a woman does with her body. It's disgraceful.
But THIS - this "crickets" gets on my bloody nerves, and you know it. Even if you aren't using my name directly. I don't spend much time here, I don't want to, and I don't need to talk about everything. Like you don't know what my reaction would be, by now? It's like a demand for my time, and none of you get to demand that I respond to anything here.
quote:Originally posted by jwhop:I'm waiting for states to pass Guardian Ad Litem laws to protect the rights of unborn babies in court proceedings under the 5th Amendment.[b]"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."But, you're right. Only a few days ago, the decision of an Obama appointed judge was being hailed as a breakthrough on the Texas law. Now, when that decision is trashed by a federal appeals court, it's crickets![/B]
[b]"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
But, you're right. Only a few days ago, the decision of an Obama appointed judge was being hailed as a breakthrough on the Texas law. Now, when that decision is trashed by a federal appeals court, it's crickets![/B]
And what about the sperm in your body? When will the laws protect them whenever a man jacks off, and all of the little sperm die outside of a "host body" (something a degenerate republican called women).
And when will you all stop looking down on welfare recipients, and taking things like free lunches away from the children who are actually born? Who are here, and need food, and care, homes, etc. ??
quote:And what about the sperm in your body? When will the laws protect them whenever a man jacks off, and all of the little sperm die outside of a "host body" (something a degenerate republican called women).
Could someone please give teasel the birds and the bees talk
How many babies are you all willing to take on, once they’re born, if the mother can’t handle it? How many are you going to ensure have a roof over their heads, food, clothes, an education? And how many of you are going to continue to ***** about “welfare mums”?
quote:Originally posted by Randall:There are more than enough parents looking to adopt. So, why don’t you find another made-up reason to justify the murder of babies?
Here's a totally novel idea. Wonder why no one has thought of it before.
DON'T GET PREGNANT UNLESS YOU WANT TO RAISE A BABY!!!!!
Birth control is under $10 per month or free for low income people.
Copyright 2000-2023 Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000 Ultimate Bulletin Board Version 5.46a
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000 Ultimate Bulletin Board Version 5.46a