*HTML is OFF *UBB Code is ON Smilies Legend
Smilies Legend
If you have previously registered, but forgotten your password, click here.
T O P I C R E V I E WRandall http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/22-dems-who-voted-against-expanded-scotus-protections-approved-extra-security-for-themselves-after-jan-6/ar-AAYvH6s?ocid=spartan-dhp-feeds We all know what would have happened if a liberal Justice's life were threatened the way that Kavanaugh's life was!teaselThe republicans who wanted security for the SCOTUS, refuse to protect American children. They also want security for themselves, but not the babies they claim to cherish. RandallIrrational much? Gun control doesn't protect children. It doesn’t take genius level IQ like President Trump has to know that school shootings occur in gun free zones.. What do babies have to do with your argument? I'm sure you would whistle a different tune if liberal Justices were being threatened, thus, naming you an A-1 hypocrite.
We all know what would have happened if a liberal Justice's life were threatened the way that Kavanaugh's life was!
Copyright 2000-2023 Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000 Ultimate Bulletin Board Version 5.46a
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000 Ultimate Bulletin Board Version 5.46a