|
Author
|
Topic: "SexScopes" by Stuart Hazelton... accurate or not? What's your opinion?
|
Lost Leo
unregistered
|
posted December 26, 2002 06:10 PM
 
Sexscopes, a book by Stuart Hazelton, who is a astrology columnist for Cosmopolitan MagazineHow accurate did you think it was? IP: Logged |
N_wEvil
unregistered
|
posted December 26, 2002 10:17 PM
from my own feelings on the matter (well..maybe i trust my intuition too much)
it *sounds* like a pile of steaming hot.......banana skins. Ok..maybe id better go read them before i form an opinion though. IP: Logged |
theFajita
unregistered
|
posted December 27, 2002 12:27 AM
LostLeo I will check them out and let you know, I skimmed right over them for that steamy story in the back, LOL, no I am kidding, I will get back to you!------------------
Food is the only art that nourishes! IP: Logged |
proxieme
unregistered
|
posted December 27, 2002 01:10 AM
Hm.
I'll look at it while I'm spending my Borders gift cards tomorrow and get back to you.IP: Logged |
Donna
unregistered
|
posted December 27, 2002 02:32 AM
Lost Leo,Well, since you asked, I am giving my opinion.  I think they are a bunch of crock and give legitimate astrology a bad rap. They simply cannot be accurate based on Sun Signs and the power of suggestion is there, for any particular Sun Sign to see what they want in themselves or a love interest. They are shallow and I personally stay away from them with a ten foot pole.  I also feel they are there as one of the selling points of the mag and although the writer may be a legitimate astrologer, I feel strongly that he is doing a dis-service to Astrology, but that is strictly my opinion, as I feel that way about all the newspaper astrology columns. It isn't any smugness about me that makes me feel this way, it is simply that when I learned to cast a natal horoscope and saw how shallow these columns were, well, they are simply misleading, just too generalized. I don't mean to upset anybody, just giving my thoughts and feelings about it, which, normally, I just keep to myself.   Donna IP: Logged |
Lost Leo
unregistered
|
posted December 27, 2002 03:14 AM
I think I misled most of you.
"SexScopes" is an actual book in itself, by Stuart Hazelton.I wanted to know if anyone has read thru it and what your thoughts were??? Next time any of you are at Borders or Barnes & Noble look it up and get back to me. I don't want to bias the thread by sharing my opinion yet, but would really appreciate objective third party opinions of it.
 IP: Logged |
theFajita
unregistered
|
posted December 27, 2002 03:55 AM
Oops! I thought you meant in this month's issue of Cosmo! I have to admit, I thought it was cute that you would read that, but hello fajita, you weren't reading that ------------------
Food is the only art that nourishes! IP: Logged |
Donna
unregistered
|
posted December 27, 2002 12:23 PM
Whoops!! Lost Leo!! Well, I remember when I used to read Cosmo, that they had the column called "The Bedroom Astrologer" and I thought perhaps they just renamed it.I will definitely check out the book when I get to the bookstore. But I can tell you, I already don't like the title, LOL. I think I am just too serious about Astrology. Donna IP: Logged |
Tuesday
unregistered
|
posted December 27, 2002 01:17 PM
I've been meaning to check this book out, I saw the sample pages on Amazon, and I thought it was hysterical. Very funny. Good for a laugh, not meant to be taken seriously. "Aries always misses the toilet seat"!IP: Logged |
Carlo
unregistered
|
posted December 27, 2002 11:47 PM
IP: Logged |
N_wEvil
unregistered
|
posted December 27, 2002 11:59 PM
hrmm...lots of research.and then maybe a little bit more.. and then some more, just to make sure its all correct.  IP: Logged |
Carlo
unregistered
|
posted December 28, 2002 12:32 AM
IP: Logged |
Lost Leo
unregistered
|
posted December 29, 2002 02:02 PM
Anyone else checked the book out lately?IP: Logged |
Lost Leo
unregistered
|
posted January 05, 2003 03:25 AM
Wanted to put it up there one last time...
anyone else read this and have an opinion?My opinion is that it's retarded, it sounds like he's basing he observations on how HE hit it off with the person rather than how the PERSON is, which is supposed to be the focus... IP: Logged |
Carlo
unregistered
|
posted January 05, 2003 11:13 AM
Well, it's one thing to hit it off...it's another thing to hit it IP: Logged |
theFajita
unregistered
|
posted January 05, 2003 06:22 PM
 ------------------
Food is the only art that nourishes! IP: Logged |
Lost Leo
unregistered
|
posted January 06, 2003 01:37 PM
There is truth in that remark IP: Logged |
Carlo
unregistered
|
posted January 06, 2003 02:55 PM
IP: Logged |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
