posted November 12, 2013 01:25 AM
There we go,Do you look at the lord of the hour when you delineate a horary chart? Would you say a horary chart is not fit to be judged if the lord of the hour doesn't satisfy the general conditions for agreement? I'm stumped tbh with this, some say it doesn't matter, while others are more picky with the rules. I like rules, so am partially in favour with the latter.
I am lenient with that, and i would judge the chart
If one of the prime significator is combust, would you look at the co-significators? or would you give an unfavourable outcome? I have in mind a recent horary chart that I have casted wherein saturn ( my prime significator - cap rising) is too close to the sun,therefore combust, however venus is in term dignity in capricorn. In this horary my co-significator seems to be stronger than my prime significator. His prime significator is the moon, in the 2nd house.Retrograde Jupiter in the 7th house tightly conjuncts DSC.
If the prime significator is combust, things are not that favourable and cannot do much for the case, so i would look at other things, like you said co-significators, receptions, what the moon is doing, rulership, dignities etc, they must be pretty good to override the combust issue,as it means you cannot be seen. I have seen it working out in charts at times after some delay .
Why do they say the 2nd house is a difficult house in horary? It eludes me, since it is the house of possessions, isn't it not?
It has to do with the connection to the Asc. In general, not strong
Therefore his co-significators would be Jupiter, and the sun? do you agree?
Yes ,i do agree
How many co-significators can be at play in a horary chart? since I've read that planets in the house of the quesited are also considered as co-significators.
Yes they are. But really you like to see an aspect between the 2 main significators of the people involved.