posted April 12, 2021 12:45 AM            

"They say you ain't behind him
And just don't understand
And think that you're a woman
But acting like a man."

I don't know whether the added gender nature has something to do with that? But there is something about their success and dominance as women that can present a differing sort of "threat" to some men.

Eleanor Roosevelt(Libra Sun) often outshone Franklin D Roosevelt🤷🏿‍♂️. This despite the latter having Sun in Aries(not only Fire sun sign but "exalted" in that position too). The former had its Sun position at its "Fall" there.

I am convinced that Hillary Clinton likely has a masculine Asc. She is more of a force to be reckoned with than Bill.

I also think Michelle Obama has a masculine Asc. I am not going to speculate that perhaps her Moon is in Aqu and not Pisces.As her time of birth is unknown. But I wouldn't be surprised if the Asc is masculine or there is a masculine planet on the Asc.

In the Sag female /Leo male relationship, the Sun is "King". But so is Jupiter.And two masculine auras tend to clash.

She may stand in front,alongside him or even behind him etc.it makes no difference.But her masculine aura will shine. Most times outdoing his own.

When she is in front, people will say that she "leads" him. When she is alongside him. People will say he "leans" on her. When she is behind him. People will say "she has his back and the 'rock' for him."

If the Leo male feels she is on the same field he is on. He could see her as a competitor than an ally. From a visceral level he senses that it is HE who'll have to adjust himself and not see HER shine as indicative of his brilliance being "dim". Not easy. More especially if Sun is afflicted.

In relationships, its always a balancing act of energies( regardless of the sexes involved). Each individual must have a place where they feel they "shine" without being threatened.

In societal norms, its often the woman(the more mature mate) who has to take the "high road" and put the male ego( less mature mate) on a pedestal so that he "thinks " he is in charge.

In same sex relationships, it is always the one with a more fragile "baby like" ego that has to feel/think that they are "in charge". Thats how all relationships work imo. Otherwise they fall apart.

But in the Leo male/Sag female relationship, it may occur (again and again)that the Leo is reminded that they are NOT in charge. And this will be from an intuitive level too.

One of two things can occur; the Leo male can resort to underhanded ways to retain some sense of "dominance" through power struggles with this woman. OR he can recognize her strength as not a threat to him and support her.🤷🏿‍♂️

The latter is harder for most Leo males because they want the OTHER to adjust to THEM. And not the other way around.😶

posted April 13, 2021 07:57 AM            

I think that there is something else to it for sure.

posted April 13, 2021 05:29 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by plutonianmenace:
I disagree with the masculinity argument because Leo men very commonly get with Aries women and Aries is by far the most masculine of all the signs.

I think that there is something else to it for sure.

Sagittarius women do seem to have it out for Leo men.

---

Yeah, I thought of this too. And maybe Aries doesn't challenge Leo on a turf they(Leo) identify strongly with?🤔

Aries tends to admire Leo ime.Aries can get starry eyed about Leo too. As Aries does tend to put someone they admire on a pedestal.

So Aries' nature doesn't interfere with Leo. Infact I think it may support it. I just don't see Sag doing this consistently. Sag is not all "heart in" like Aries can be(barring adverse aspects to the contrary).