Lindaland
  Global Unity 2.0
  AOC Calls For Radical Gun Ban!

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   AOC Calls For Radical Gun Ban!
Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 108625
From: From a galaxy, far, far away...
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 24, 2019 02:46 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
http://www.dailywire.com/news/44971/ocasio-cortez-calls-radical-gun-ban-champions-ryan-saavedra?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=uschronicle&fbclid=IwAR2pqpXAMvcm tmY4gD9GCH5fDU92yBUfzXOxnJF-lOdjQnQFJUVsO1BJdb8

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 12623
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 24, 2019 10:21 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The perfect example of why low IQ Socialists should never be anywhere near the levers of power in the United States. It's a stain on the people of the congressional district in New York who elected Cortez that she has no clue about Constitutional government.

IP: Logged

mirage29
Knowflake

Posts: 11218
From: us
Registered: May 2012

posted March 24, 2019 02:50 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for mirage29     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
My father served his whole life in the military. I remember his collection of guns (and everything associated with gun ownership).

I remember my father leaving the house to go up the road as guardsman to hold Peace in the nearby city that was besieged by destructive race-riots. Scary times-- my dad seemed to always disappear during times of emergencies!!

He was a marksman who had exceptional eyesight, and won medals/awards in national contests for his expertise on two types of rifles.

He tried to get me interested, but (maybe strangely), I was in no-way attracted to it at all... (I tried).

I heard an interesting exchange about a very GOOD reason that our Founders wanted to preserve the rights to free-speech #1 (and by extension, freedom of the press), and for the right to bear arms #2.

#1 was to protect ourselves against those making and enforcing laws, holding power-over, who want to quash or silence any voiced "opposition" -- could be to abuses, or for information-held that is key to fair representation.

#2 protects ourselves against those who would harm-- including, those who build armed-groups, armies, and organized rogue (crazed) individuals, who stockpile weapons/bullets, serious high-volume weapons for mass-murders, in order to perform "the will" of someone they wished strategically-placed into position of Sole Authority and Power-- in order to subjugate "our" nation to his(their) advantage, will and desires-- ultimately forming a single dictator-ruled government.

This is still considered a young and "experimental form" of government, which at its core is supposed to be OF the People, and FOR the People--- ALL of the People.

Through following the rule of law, and the carefully wisely designed Constitution, proposals must agree to be submitted to the slow winnowing-and-sifting of its EQUAL branches and systems, to ensure safety of "Checks and Balance" of power.

God Bless, Preserve, and Keep Safe OUR Nation.

IP: Logged

ballerina
Moderator

Posts: 1446
From: A Place on Earth
Registered: Feb 2014

posted March 24, 2019 03:32 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for ballerina     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Ever see the movie,
Hacksaw Ridge!?

------------------
All my love, with all my Heart
lotusheartone/Emeraldopal

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright 2000-2019

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a