Author
|
Topic: Ami Anne - Question for you :)
|
LionFish Knowflake Posts: 111 From: Yakima, WA, USA Registered: Aug 2012
|
posted October 10, 2012 04:10 PM
What would a Juno-Juno opposition in Synastry mean? Sag/Gem Opposition, both at 15'35 of each sign. I know that in relation to other people's personal planets it can have a binding effect when aspects are created, but I can't really find any Juno-Juno info, a lot of Juno-Sun/Moon/Venus/Mars/Jupiter stuff though! I've been looking for days before I finally broke down and asked. ------------------ Leo ASC, Pis Sun, Tau moon IP: Logged |
Ami Anne Moderator Posts: 37384 From: Pluto/house next to NickiG Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted October 10, 2012 04:49 PM
Hi lionfish Well, let me talk about Venus opposed to Venus and we can extrapolate, as I have more experience with this. This is, often, an opposites attract. However, there may be a level of not really understanding what the person finds beautiful, so arguments may incur, as happens when opposites attract.We need oppositions and squares, in synastry, as all easy aspects would make it like brother/sister. With the Juno's, I think you may have the same situation as the Venus' But there may be different views on what it means to be in a committed relationship. Does that seem like it fits? ------------------ Passion, Lust, Desire. Check out my journal http://www.mychristianpsychic.com/
IP: Logged |
LionFish Knowflake Posts: 111 From: Yakima, WA, USA Registered: Aug 2012
|
posted October 11, 2012 04:58 AM
It does! But it also doesn't make sense in a way because I'm the sag, he's the gem, and his views on relationships seem more wandering and open than mine. I would think it'd be the other way around...
IP: Logged |
Ami Anne Moderator Posts: 37384 From: Pluto/house next to NickiG Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted October 11, 2012 07:14 AM
quote: Originally posted by LionFish: It does! But it also doesn't make sense in a way because I'm the sag, he's the gem, and his views on relationships seem more wandering and open than mine. I would think it'd be the other way around...
Well, the asteroids are more minor than the planets, one could say, as a generalization, for the moment. You are making a broad conclusion based on one asteroid opposition. This is not good, logical Astrology ------------------ Passion, Lust, Desire. Check out my journal http://www.mychristianpsychic.com/
IP: Logged |
LionFish Knowflake Posts: 111 From: Yakima, WA, USA Registered: Aug 2012
|
posted October 11, 2012 03:49 PM
I don't understand what you mean?I wasn't concluding anything on a single asteroid placement. It's just what I was asking about. And me relaying how what you said resonated... I'm not sure why I always come across this way. It's not just you, quite a few people it seems like, assume that I'm basing EVERYTHING on one planet/asteroid/aspect (whichever it happens to be that I'm currently asking about.) And then like here, with you, when I give feedback directly related to what is asked/answered..I'm told I'm doing something wrong..I give up lol IP: Logged |
Ami Anne Moderator Posts: 37384 From: Pluto/house next to NickiG Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted October 11, 2012 04:55 PM
Lionfish You did not come across, weird! Astrology is a language, like Chinese lol You have to stumble around a long time before you see the bigger picture. My point was that you were drawing too much of a conclusion from a small aspect between asteroids. We would need to see the whole charts to address your question, SWeetie ------------------ Passion, Lust, Desire. Check out my journal http://www.mychristianpsychic.com/
IP: Logged | |