posted February 23, 2019 07:05 AM            

Time comes from BC/BR and is correct (I first got into Astrology almost 15 years ago and never felt the [western] ASC or Placidus houses were off so). So why doesn't it work for me?

Chart: http://i.imgur.com/7qjbYv2.jpg

-

posted February 25, 2019 10:41 AM            

generally nakshatra is on point though yeah, but in your case with multiple planets altering expression and it's opposite its natural ruler which is retrograde in your chart it's a lot harder to feel with that restrictive energy on top of it

also just looking again and it's hemmed, so there's a malefic on either side of it which further diminishes expression

and they're both the 2 closest planets to it (sure degrees matter less in vedic, but personally i think both systems have their merits and degrees do make a difference)

sandwiching anything between saturn and mars isn't going to result in much

posted July 28, 2019 02:35 AM            

Kiki: vaultoftheheavens uses the tropical zodiac for -signs-, but uses sidereal for Nakshatras - so I'm still Purva Ashadha. Thank you for the reply, however.

posted July 30, 2019 07:26 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by ULT12:
Kiki: vaultoftheheavens uses the tropical zodiac for -signs-, but uses sidereal for Nakshatras - so I'm still Purva Ashadha. Thank you for the reply, however.

---

posted July 30, 2019 09:25 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by ULT12:
Hi to both (or all). I am amhz, I made a new account because I forgot the old's password and email.

Kiki: vaultoftheheavens uses the tropical zodiac for -signs-, but uses sidereal for Nakshatras - so I'm still Purva Ashadha. Thank you for the reply, however.

SunAsc: Basically, I do not jive at all with the 'warring' motif cast on the Nakshatra. Almost every source mentions the Nakshatra is 'dominating', 'argumentative', and things like that. Whole charts need to be taken into account because contradictory elements exist, I was just viewing the Nakshatra as an overriding force - when it isn't. With Moon conjunct Venus, Mars (aggression, assertion) in Detriment/Libra, and Sun (Ego) in Debilitation/Libra - it makes sense I am not and never have been or will be a 'dominating' person.

---

posted July 30, 2019 09:27 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by ULT12:
Hi to both (or all). I am amhz, I made a new account because I forgot the old's password and email.

Kiki: vaultoftheheavens uses the tropical zodiac for -signs-, but uses sidereal for Nakshatras - so I'm still Purva Ashadha. Thank you for the reply, however.

SunAsc: Basically, I do not jive at all with the 'warring' motif cast on the Nakshatra. Almost every source mentions the Nakshatra is 'dominating', 'argumentative', and things like that. Whole charts need to be taken into account because contradictory elements exist, I was just viewing the Nakshatra as an overriding force - when it isn't. With Moon conjunct Venus, Mars (aggression, assertion) in Detriment/Libra, and Sun (Ego) in Debilitation/Libra - it makes sense I am not and never have been or will be a 'dominating' person.

---

Are you very libran in behavious coz damn that is quite a stellium, basically every personal planet and luminaries in it except mercury.

Edit: Ohh i misunderstood., sun, mars, mercury in libra.

posted July 31, 2019 02:01 AM            

anony: The OP chart/etc was in Sidereal terms, so in Tropical I'm a Scorpio Sun and Mercury, and 29deg Libra Mars. I don't think I'm -Libran- per se, but I'm not the classical vengeful, tempestuous, angry, etc Scorpio type. Taurus ASC graces me with a calm/at peace-ness all the time, and Moon conjunct Neptune makes me not want to hurt a fly.

-

posted July 31, 2019 06:09 AM            

I think this one is a much better site : http://www.prokerala.com/astrology/birth-chart/

Choose "Northern Style" as the option in the Chart Style. Rasi = Moon Chart, Lagna = ASC Chart, Navamsa = D9 Chart. (all of them are important)....thats what sheee saaays ~ ~ ~

posted July 31, 2019 12:32 PM            

The Nakshatra -can- make one "dogmatic" and unsympathetic because it is -principled-, but this is different from being aggressive i.e. "warring" and "dominating" which is how this Nakshatra is cast elsewhere. In the end, I think Mars is relevant to whether one is "dominating" i.e. extraverts their principles, or just doesn't so isn't warring and argumentative.

posted December 15, 2019 07:55 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by aamhz:
I've looked it up for others and this single placement is always shockingly on point for everyone. But for me... no, not even one aspect (well, prokerala had a few sentences I've never seen anywhere else that was amazingly on-point - but still, 80% was "no???", and that was only one source out of many).

Time comes from BC/BR and is correct (I first got into Astrology almost 15 years ago and never felt the [western] ASC or Placidus houses were off so). So why doesn't it work for me?

Chart: http://i.imgur.com/7qjbYv2.jpg

-

I'm aware I have Saturn in my Nakshatra, but really?? That's why the Nakshatra just isn't true? (Saturn restricts) - This is not a problem in Western, I still identify with Moon conj Neptune despite Saturn tightly conjuncting Neptune.

---

I hope I can help but first I need to know, are you specifically talking about your Moon Nakshatra?

If so, your Moon Nakshatra (Purvashadha) lord is Venus

And Purvashadha nakshatra is actually very good, it is one of the most sexual/sensual Nakshatras. Its ruled by water. Making it more emotional, as well as deepening.

The Pada of the Nakshatra will also change it to some degree. You are in Pada 2.

Also, what about the Nakshatra doesn't fit?
Not everything can be 100% accurate since you would have to consider aspects to your Moon and also any conjunctions which will change some details for you.