Author
|
Topic: Sextrology Turn Ons :)
|
Carlo unregistered
|
posted February 23, 2004 10:19 AM
Natasha, you are NOT too big to spank!IP: Logged |
pixelpixie Newflake Posts: 8 From: ON Canada Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 23, 2004 10:54 AM
So carlo.. what's your astrological opinion then on my placements? Would I be a Sub or a Dom? Scorp sun, Cappy moon (?!) Leo rising.. Venus in Sagittarius (5th house)Mars in Scorpio....... Seriously, I am curious!IP: Logged |
sthenri unregistered
|
posted February 23, 2004 10:59 AM
Spank ME! That would be hard because I run fast and I kick. Yes I agree that with your Aqua moon you need intellectual stimulation, but you are still a romantic soul pouting inside. Whey else would Taureans like you? Aqua moons can really verbalize feelings too and that's a tool to be used for good/bad. Yes I know about Virgos evil ways, they can really verbally slap people into line.And they can hold out on the cuddling when they want which isn't nice. Cancer moons needs lots of cuddling. Dirgedoll sounds sweet. When a Taurus pouts it's not for real, sometimes we just like to be ultra dramatic and the next day the storm has passed. We are forgiving. But then again I have Venus in Aries so I am not quick to judge. I do stay mad though if a man buys jewelry of ANY kind right in front of me and ignores me. That's not nice. Wait, Carlo if a woman buys you a collar does that you mean you are the dom or sub? And do secretly want to be the "woman" so you can be courted and treated? Natasha Taurus IP: Logged |
pidaua Knowflake Posts: 67 From: Back in AZ with Bear the Leo Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 23, 2004 11:20 AM
Collars? Leashes..oh my goodness, that made me break out in a cold sweat just thinking about how awful it would be to be tied up. I think I would have to be in control - I don't dig authority and sure as heck COULD NOT do something that someone TOLD me to do. Like clean someones house and call them master? ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww Harpyr, I thought outdoors was listed under Sag ladies? Maybe I left it out. The book does go into more detail about personality, sexual style and perferances. What I found to be interesting was a part that discusses the Sag mindset regarding life and relationships. It details how we are so prone to living in the future, that we neglect what is here in the present. We may even seek a mate based on "where we see ourselves" in a few years. Most often a Sag women marries at least twice and the first marriage is typically to an older man that has his $hit together. Then they / we realize that is should be more about love / intimacy that a learning process and the guy is left for a more loving relationship. I saw myself in that. I mean, I did have boyfriends, but I didn't see them as equals at the time, nor could I see them as future husbands. I DID marry an older, settled man and I DID leave him for love instead of the constant being molded and shaped. Then again, in my own way, I shaped him too. Now, I am in a relationship where I can be ME. I can love, fight, laugh, cry and not have to worry about if he will still love me tomorrow. I guess in my own way, I was submissive - but I learned from it and I got ALOT out of it. IP: Logged |
pidaua Knowflake Posts: 67 From: Back in AZ with Bear the Leo Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 23, 2004 11:26 AM
I found, by description, that my favorite turn on by males of a certain sign had to be: 1) Leo (duh) 2) Libra 3) Aquarius I would have listed Aries, but the active anal sex and domination freaks me out. I am sure they are not all like that. Taurus was pretty high up, I like the epic sex session and tactile ability,but I think I would have hard time staying with a bull. IP: Logged |
proxieme unregistered
|
posted February 23, 2004 11:44 AM
(...)But the house slaves HA HA HA I bet there weren't any Taureans in there.(...)Gah, and while I'd bet a dollar that there were a couple Pisces there, I'd bet three that none of them had a Scorpio Asc and Leo Mars. But...hm. I dunno...maybe there would've been a Scorp Asc. in there or two (albeit w/ a different Mars) - the exploration of how power plays on and with people, of observing it and batting it around, is intriguing. And, like I said, Fishies have no problem with being slightly submissive (most probably enjoy a little domination; boundaries, you know), and that Rising may have double-fun with it - after all, if done right I'll bet that there's an incredible amount of power in that. Well, as far as the roles in light S & M (read: rough sex) go, anyway. I don't see any Scorp Asc going for the whole house slave bit (especially the "Master," etc, part), though, let alone one with an Aqua Moon. "You want me to what? Clean?!? And stay quiet at the same time? Screw dat." IP: Logged |
Harpyr Newflake Posts: 0 From: Alaska Registered: Jun 2010
|
posted February 23, 2004 12:39 PM
pixie~ oh golly.. I forgot that the last time I made a humanure comment it was sparked by something you said! Please don't take it personally.. I was more pointing it out as a general thing that people do and it just happened to be sparked by your comment. Scorpio does rule such things however so perhaps it's not totally coincidental. I thought the Freudian slip at the end was hilarious.Pidaua~ That's interesting about how Saggies have their eye to the future regarding mate selection.. I suppose I haven't been very typical some regards then. All the men that I have been involved with have been still floundering around in the world trying to figure out their place in it. None of them have had $. Buut.. I have always had aspirations of being a musician myself and have waxed and waned in my pursuit of it, but have very consistently gotten involved with extremely talented musicians. I think that it's partially me living vicariously through them, part me wanting them to teach me something and part deep appreciation of their craft. Money has never been a priority for me in my search for a mate, love has always taken precedence. It may have been because when I was younger my mother always recommended that I marry someone rich, (She grew up quite poor) and I instinctively always bristled and rebelled against that rationale, insisting that I would never compromise love for security and so far I've remained true to that. Even if I've had doubts about the sanity of that when I'm at the food stamp office, they always go away as soon as I'm in my beloved's arms. I am always very conscious of what direction our paths of personal evolution are taking us because I wouldn't want to get involved with someone whose values and goals became totally divergent from what I wanted. So in that sense, I definetly have my eye toward the future. Now.. as for this whole slave/master thing. I know for certain that I would never be cut out for cleaning someone's house and never getting to speak. I mean- egads. How many Saggies would really be into that? I would be open to exploring some lite s & m.. with scarves but it would have to go both ways.. I'd have to try my hand at being submissive and then getting to tie my sweetcheeks up. Typically I've been more interested in gettin my thrills from discreet sex in public places.. Okay okay.. and one time it wasn't so discreet and it was very public.. but it was in the wee hours of the morning and traffic was light. IP: Logged |
pidaua Knowflake Posts: 67 From: Back in AZ with Bear the Leo Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 23, 2004 12:51 PM
Harpyr, Yes, I see you point about the public thing. LOL...I like the potential risk factor, which is probably why I like the outdoors thing. I have dated my fair share of lost souls. LOL..musicians, artists, etc..but something was never quite right. I just couldn't SEE myself supporting them. It would be different if I was in a relationship / marriage and they lost their job. Money isn't THAT important, but I have learned that it affords me my freedom. Taking care of someone or asking someone for money is NOT my style. The Virgo I was married to had money, but he was VERY TIGHT. I mean, I paid for just about all the travel, dinners out....etc.. I finally told him that he was too 'Slow to open his wallet'. See, he rather enjoyed making me ask for money, our marriage counselor called it 'subterfuge'. As it ended up, I just stopped including him in my travel plans, discontinued the dinners out for the most part, and took to ignoring him. That was my way of showing I could not be controlled. Both of us were rather childish in retrospect. In any case, I think that two people do have to have a common goal. I saw my ex as an extremely intelligent and sophisticated person, and he is. I was deeply attracted to that because I wanted someone that I could grow old with and continue to learn about the world. BUT, a Sag is still a fire sign and we NEED a certain amount of physical intimacy. Nothing will change that - at least not for me. Another aspect about the money, I am not sure if it has to do with my natal Saturn in Taurus, but I do not feel at all stable without money in the bank. I admire people that can be so free-spirited because if I have less than a few grand in savings and less than $50.00 in my wallet, I feel a certain panic. In my younger years I seemed to attract mooches. I remember one Virgo guy that I dated who NEVER had money, so I was happy to share. Then I found out he was saving all his paychecks for a trip to Europe while living off everyone else (he kept that part secret). I told him a thing or two and I pretty much tore his heart out. Just desserts as far as I am concerned. IP: Logged |
sthenri unregistered
|
posted February 23, 2004 02:48 PM
Yep, it's the Saturn in Taurus, they do not like those who do share the $. I attract all sorts of people but I do believe in equality, money is an emotional issue and has become a power struggle with people now.I do not like petty power struggles unless it's sexy. Power struggles about money on a personal level are very vindictive and just boring. As in, "Okay , who ordered the bottled water?", "Who wants to pay for the tip?" Natasha
IP: Logged |
sthenri unregistered
|
posted February 23, 2004 02:49 PM
Was that understood? My thought processes are kind of messy today after all that Carlo/Virgo talk.Natasha Taurus IP: Logged |
sthenri unregistered
|
posted February 23, 2004 02:50 PM
Yep, it's the Saturn in Taurus, they do not like those who do share the $. I attract all sorts of people but I do believe in equality, money is an emotional issue and has become a power struggle with people now.I do not like petty power struggles unless it's sexy. Power struggles about money on a personal level are very vindictive and just boring. As in, "Okay , who ordered the bottled water?", "Who wants to pay for the tip?" Natasha
IP: Logged |
trillian Newflake Posts: 0 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 23, 2004 03:32 PM
How the heck did I miss this thread???Lovin' it ladies...and gents. Hey, I have a Cappy moon and am quite cuddly. And I'm not adverse to tying up a naughty boy and giving him a sound spanking. Vanilla is a wonderful flavor, but as a steady diet? Nuh-uh. I have so much Aries in me, you'll never see me as a sub. But as a Domme, in those cool high heels, wielding a whip, a man on his knees to worship me? Nothin' wrong with that picture! Pixel, I love your posts and your adventerous spirit. Keep it coming. As long as it's consenting adults involved, I try not to judge people too much on their sexuality. The hardwiring is different in each of us, and while I might not understand the sexual needs of someone, I do my best to accept. I'm generally not a big fan of Freud, but didn't he say that the only abnormal sex, is no sex? I generally agree, though again, as long as it's consenting adults. IP: Logged |
trillian Newflake Posts: 0 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 23, 2004 03:35 PM
Oh, Natasha, if a woman buys a man a collar, to collar him, that denotes ownership. The man is the sub, the woman his Domme. IP: Logged |
ariestiger unregistered
|
posted February 23, 2004 03:53 PM
Hey Pidaua I'm not so sure about some of the suggestions! And I always tend to go for slightly older men, rather than younger...You're right about the stubble and the forearms, though. And I do like male sweat - so long as it's FRESH and clean. IP: Logged |
trillian Newflake Posts: 0 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 23, 2004 04:14 PM
Just sittin' here at my desk, thinkin', I didn't see "Furries and Plushies" under the kinks for any of the signs. You'd have to be a CSI fan to understand...but I looked it up on the web, it's real! Surprised even me. Pid, thanks so much for posting the lists, I'm enjoying them very much, as well as everyone's myriad of diverse responses.
IP: Logged |
pidaua Knowflake Posts: 67 From: Back in AZ with Bear the Leo Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 23, 2004 04:19 PM
LOL...yeah it is real. LOL. I heard about that a couple of years ago and they did a spot on MTV. I almost fell off my chair laughing when a guy was really serious about making love to another person while wearing a stuffed animal custom. The other person was wearing a tiger plushie outfit. LOL>.. Trillian, you are too funny for thinking of that LOL IP: Logged |
dorkus_malorkus unregistered
|
posted February 23, 2004 04:44 PM
Yes, very um interesting.....IP: Logged |
trillian Newflake Posts: 0 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 23, 2004 07:37 PM
Pid...on CSI, I think they called that "scritching." Oh, and newbies were "Furgins." My my my...in a world of possibilities... IP: Logged |
Carlo unregistered
|
posted February 23, 2004 09:51 PM
slave pixy, you would def be my sub, without question, you would pay with you mind, body and soul for treating me so inattentively and self-servingly here, knowing full well that...haha, jk...you've been moderately tasty so far...IP: Logged |
astro junkie unregistered
|
posted February 24, 2004 12:57 AM
Natasia -Remember when I said Virgo's like things that are "the more obscure the better"? It's got all its own language and culture and "you don't understand us" thing going. Pixel - You'd make a good Dom BUT...
what hasn't been revealed truthfully here is that the best Sub's happen to be people who have high-pressure, power-driven, jobs who are basically control freaks with everything else in their life. Do you all get it now? Not that I've had personal experience, I mean... I HEARD about it... As for the "cleaning" thing... I couldn't seriously do that without cracking up within the first 5 minutes. I mean, I couldn't be the "cleaner" OR expect a Sub to do that without totally making it funny as hell. Ummmm... could be some people take themselves WAY too seriously. Dorkus - I f'g LOVE your dry humor... truly...
.gloria IP: Logged |
pixelpixie Newflake Posts: 8 From: ON Canada Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 24, 2004 01:09 AM
Yeah, I was just curious as to your take on it.... I pretty much already know I am "flexible". Bendy.... I CAN do either one well.... but... the whole being dominated? Not by just anyone. Although I can turn on my own dominating personality with whomever.... even if in jest. But I do get a sort of thrill out of being in control ( big surprise) But it is also thrilling to have none of my own decisions to make, and sexy to be whatever someone needs at the same time. I mean, in my regular life, I love helping (deserving) people. So naturally, that would sidestep into my sexual life too. It would please me to please someone.(deserving) But if they f^cked with my sense of self or degraded me, never again!!!! If that happened, next time, I would be the Dom.. ( obviously just bedroom play, I'm not in the actual lifestyle!!!)and I would make them lick my boot. IP: Logged |
Duality unregistered
|
posted February 24, 2004 02:39 AM
quote: And who's Michael Hutchence? Is he single?
. He was the lead singer of Inexs and is unfortunately very...dead!. As a 4 times Gem only the following suits me:. Seduction, playing ingenue Mutual masterbation Standing sex Speedy thrusting (active) oral sex (passive) lite b+d Tickling, pinching, teasing (passive) nipple play I'm a shame to my sign OK, WHAT is "pearl necklace" ????. I'll be back with more questions and "observations" IP: Logged |
Carlo unregistered
|
posted February 24, 2004 10:12 AM
IP: Logged |
trillian Newflake Posts: 0 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 24, 2004 11:04 AM
One thing to remember, that was a bit of a revelation for me when it finally sunk in, is that in D/s, ultimately it is the sub who has the control and power. The sub always has the option to simply say "No."Therein lies part of the intoxicating rub. I love a good paradox.
IP: Logged |
astro junkie unregistered
|
posted February 24, 2004 11:23 PM
ANNOUNCEMENT:::Randall has officially closed this thread. DO NOT add anything more to it - whatever's left of the posts has been transcribed to: http://groups.msn.com/LindaLandjoints/messages.msnw ANNOUNCEMENT:::
The winner of the Potty Mouth Award goes to.... *drum roll* .... Pidaua with a whopping NINE posts deleted from this thread. Congratulations Pidaua - you know we love you girl... THIS THREAD is outta-here -
IP: Logged | |