Lindaland
  Astrology
  Technological Advances vs. Being Fumbling Fallible Humans

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Technological Advances vs. Being Fumbling Fallible Humans
astro junkie
unregistered
posted June 18, 2004 03:45 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
When I was talking about auras in another thread, I wrote off the top of my head, that it seems to me that as time goes on, auras seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Less vibrant.

Also, lately I've been struck with one of my psychic visions. Would you like to know?

Something is telling me to pay attention to a slow and subtle introduction of technology into our lives. Maybe it has to do with some transit, but nothing pops out at me. Symbolically, I see it as a Cancer soul who prays we don't forget how to feel.

It's just creepy to me all the possibilities of current nanotechnology advancements. Sure, it's fantastic for creating electrical waves to paralyzed muscles, so a message from the brain can reach the muscle. But there's a self-hatred out there which needs to be WHOLLY resolved before we start getting into this, or else we will be going down some paths I cannot even imagine in my wildest dreams!!

To the point where to those future half-organic, half-technically enhanced "people" 100 years from now will view us as fumbling cave people in comparison.

To be able to feel completely, at the expense of a broken heart. How disgusting, they may think. To allow imperfections to pass into the next generation, how fallible and ignorant we were. Do you think?

How do you think any of the signs or influences will react to this? Whether it be in directing us in the right direction, to pure rebellion.

IP: Logged

Yang
unregistered
posted June 18, 2004 04:03 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I think as time goes by, we will become more and more technologically driven, to a point where we would look back at time and say "Why were we so slow in advancing technologically?"I say we will fall short to machines ruling us.We will constantly drive ourselves to be more advanced to the point we will kill ourselves trying to acheive it.

As for the signs,I would say every sign will have its part to play.

IP: Logged

Yang
unregistered
posted June 18, 2004 04:06 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
OOps wrong smiley

IP: Logged

ariestiger
unregistered
posted June 18, 2004 04:46 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Ah, but, astrojunkie, computers are CERTAINLY more fumbling and fallible than humans. Who fixed our computer when it was sick with a virus a short while ago? The PC doctor. Can a computer fix me when I'm down with a virus? No. We're still in control.

As far as being worried about the prospect of "improved" human beings - well - I figure I'll confront that monster when it rears its head.

IP: Logged

astro junkie
unregistered
posted June 19, 2004 10:43 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
This is what I mean. How much more tempting can THIS modification of genes be:::

"Scientific American
June 17, 2004

Gene Linked to Lasting Love in Voles

The manipulation of a single gene is enough to cure the wandering eye of a meadow vole.

According to a report published today in the journal Nature, gene therapy that increases levels of a specific protein in the brain turned the promiscuous creatures into monogamous mates.

Previous research with captive male prairie voles, which form lifelong bonds with a single partner, indicated that the animals had high levels of vasopressin receptors in the ventral pallidum, a brain region closely associated with the reward system. In contrast, captive male meadow voles, which often take multiple partners throughout their lives, lacked vasopressin receptors. In the new work, Miranda M. Lim of Emory University and her colleagues inserted a gene that encodes for the vasopressin receptor protein directly into the brains of male meadow voles. The researchers then observed the animals' behavior as they were introduced to a variety of potential partners

They found that meadow voles treated with gene therapy acted more like their prairie vole counterparts--they spent more time huddling near their original companion. According to study co-author Larry J. Young of Emory University, the results provide evidence “in a comparatively simple animal model that changes in the activity of a single gene profoundly can change a fundamental social behavior of animals within a species.”

Of course, it's a big step from voles to people, but the researchers hope the results will contribute to a better understanding of how human attachments form. Such knowledge could inform treatment options for disorders such as autism, which disrupt a person's ability to form social bonds. “It is intriguing,” says Young, “to consider that individual differences in vasopressin reception in humans might play a role in how differently people form relationships.”

IP: Logged

Archer
unregistered
posted June 22, 2004 08:32 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
what ever has happened , is happening and will happen is for the good.
-Bhagvad Gita

IP: Logged

astro junkie
unregistered
posted June 24, 2004 12:48 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Without cheating, try to guess what this image is of:::

IP: Logged

LighTgrEEn
unregistered
posted June 24, 2004 01:10 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It looks like plants underwater. Am i close?


Or maybe someones's hair underwater that is all designed and make pretty.

IP: Logged

LighTgrEEn
unregistered
posted June 24, 2004 01:12 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
WAIT....what.....he he....no that was my imagination, It isn't anyone's hair or te top of their head.

IP: Logged

Archer
unregistered
posted June 24, 2004 03:59 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
what is it?

IP: Logged

Archer
unregistered
posted June 24, 2004 04:00 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
something to do with microbiology?

IP: Logged

astro junkie
unregistered
posted June 24, 2004 09:04 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
microbiology is a close guess - don't cheat!

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2011

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a