Author
|
Topic: Technological Advances vs. Being Fumbling Fallible Humans
|
astro junkie unregistered
|
posted June 18, 2004 03:45 PM
When I was talking about auras in another thread, I wrote off the top of my head, that it seems to me that as time goes on, auras seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Less vibrant.Also, lately I've been struck with one of my psychic visions. Would you like to know? Something is telling me to pay attention to a slow and subtle introduction of technology into our lives. Maybe it has to do with some transit, but nothing pops out at me. Symbolically, I see it as a Cancer soul who prays we don't forget how to feel. It's just creepy to me all the possibilities of current nanotechnology advancements. Sure, it's fantastic for creating electrical waves to paralyzed muscles, so a message from the brain can reach the muscle. But there's a self-hatred out there which needs to be WHOLLY resolved before we start getting into this, or else we will be going down some paths I cannot even imagine in my wildest dreams!! To the point where to those future half-organic, half-technically enhanced "people" 100 years from now will view us as fumbling cave people in comparison. To be able to feel completely, at the expense of a broken heart. How disgusting, they may think. To allow imperfections to pass into the next generation, how fallible and ignorant we were. Do you think? How do you think any of the signs or influences will react to this? Whether it be in directing us in the right direction, to pure rebellion. IP: Logged |
Yang unregistered
|
posted June 18, 2004 04:03 PM
I think as time goes by, we will become more and more technologically driven, to a point where we would look back at time and say "Why were we so slow in advancing technologically?"I say we will fall short to machines ruling us.We will constantly drive ourselves to be more advanced to the point we will kill ourselves trying to acheive it.As for the signs,I would say every sign will have its part to play.
IP: Logged |
Yang unregistered
|
posted June 18, 2004 04:06 PM
OOps wrong smiley IP: Logged |
ariestiger unregistered
|
posted June 18, 2004 04:46 PM
Ah, but, astrojunkie, computers are CERTAINLY more fumbling and fallible than humans. Who fixed our computer when it was sick with a virus a short while ago? The PC doctor. Can a computer fix me when I'm down with a virus? No. We're still in control.As far as being worried about the prospect of "improved" human beings - well - I figure I'll confront that monster when it rears its head. IP: Logged |
astro junkie unregistered
|
posted June 19, 2004 10:43 PM
This is what I mean. How much more tempting can THIS modification of genes be:::"Scientific American June 17, 2004 Gene Linked to Lasting Love in Voles The manipulation of a single gene is enough to cure the wandering eye of a meadow vole. According to a report published today in the journal Nature, gene therapy that increases levels of a specific protein in the brain turned the promiscuous creatures into monogamous mates. Previous research with captive male prairie voles, which form lifelong bonds with a single partner, indicated that the animals had high levels of vasopressin receptors in the ventral pallidum, a brain region closely associated with the reward system. In contrast, captive male meadow voles, which often take multiple partners throughout their lives, lacked vasopressin receptors. In the new work, Miranda M. Lim of Emory University and her colleagues inserted a gene that encodes for the vasopressin receptor protein directly into the brains of male meadow voles. The researchers then observed the animals' behavior as they were introduced to a variety of potential partners They found that meadow voles treated with gene therapy acted more like their prairie vole counterparts--they spent more time huddling near their original companion. According to study co-author Larry J. Young of Emory University, the results provide evidence “in a comparatively simple animal model that changes in the activity of a single gene profoundly can change a fundamental social behavior of animals within a species.” Of course, it's a big step from voles to people, but the researchers hope the results will contribute to a better understanding of how human attachments form. Such knowledge could inform treatment options for disorders such as autism, which disrupt a person's ability to form social bonds. “It is intriguing,” says Young, “to consider that individual differences in vasopressin reception in humans might play a role in how differently people form relationships.” IP: Logged |
Archer unregistered
|
posted June 22, 2004 08:32 AM
what ever has happened , is happening and will happen is for the good. -Bhagvad GitaIP: Logged |
astro junkie unregistered
|
posted June 24, 2004 12:48 AM
Without cheating, try to guess what this image is of::: IP: Logged |
LighTgrEEn unregistered
|
posted June 24, 2004 01:10 AM
It looks like plants underwater. Am i close? Or maybe someones's hair underwater that is all designed and make pretty.
IP: Logged |
LighTgrEEn unregistered
|
posted June 24, 2004 01:12 AM
WAIT....what.....he he....no that was my imagination, It isn't anyone's hair or te top of their head.IP: Logged |
Archer unregistered
|
posted June 24, 2004 03:59 AM
what is it?IP: Logged |
Archer unregistered
|
posted June 24, 2004 04:00 AM
something to do with microbiology?IP: Logged |
astro junkie unregistered
|
posted June 24, 2004 09:04 AM
microbiology is a close guess - don't cheat!IP: Logged | |