Vulcan??? - Lindaland

Lindaland

Astrology

Vulcan???

profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Author	Topic: Vulcan???
future_uncertain Knowflake Posts: 193 From: Registered: May 2009	posted August 27, 2004 08:40 PM Linda's written so much about Vulcan... any up to date info on this topic? IP: Logged
astro junkie unregistered	posted August 27, 2004 08:41 PM This is one of those "everyone's a comedian" type questions. You're going embark on something interesting, but perhaps too fettered in detail. Maybe not. Do tell. .gloria IP: Logged
Archer unregistered	posted August 27, 2004 11:32 PM i think that the vulcan thing is all krap ------------------ Neerav IP: Logged
astro junkie unregistered	posted August 27, 2004 11:47 PM Don't pay attention to Archer. He's rude to all strangers and newcomers, guess that would put you ... uh ... IP: Logged
Archer unregistered	posted August 28, 2004 04:07 AM :-( what was so rude about calling vulcan theory krap? ------------------ Neerav IP: Logged
Archer unregistered	posted August 28, 2004 04:11 AM ur giving me a hard time a.j. perhaps, ur being rude. IP: Logged
Swerve unregistered	posted August 28, 2004 02:49 PM It was an ill-thought out answer, showing a lack of respect for the question put forward and displayed an unintelligent response in a forum famed for its enlightened inhabitants. And if you are incapable of seeing that you could have made a newcomer uneasy about asking questions that could be important or merely a thing of curiosity to them, then I have just wasted 2 minutes of my time. Ignorance isn't always bliss. Swerve IP: Logged
silverbells unregistered	posted August 28, 2004 06:11 PM Welcome future_uncertain . I haven't heard anything about Vulcan but I would think that one could look into Egyptian astrology findings and see if there is anything to be found, such as how many planets did they recognise and so on. Even some "obscure" findings could enlighten. Archer could have explained more about why he thought that the theory was "crap" but that doesn't mean that he is ignorant, just, at the least, blunt, at the most, careless of others' feelings OR the myriad of other possibilites in between OR something else OR it could be that he was being mean. Personally I didn't think that it was mean/rude persay. Future_uncertain did not say "I believe in the Vulcan theory and I just can't wait for it to be rediscovered so that the Virgos can be set free," or anything like that. There was no investment of emotion in the post that would automatically make calling the theory "crap" a personal attack. You know? It was rather blunt though. But if more people were blunt there wouldn't be half of the misunderstandings in the world that there are. Ok, I went off on a bit of a tangent - but it's important. Swerve - And this is an earnest question: what makes you feel that the inhabitants of this or any other forum on this board are "enlightened"? ------------------ Get some love in your groove, just get hip to forgive... - Michael Franks IP: Logged
silverbells unregistered	posted August 28, 2004 07:21 PM You know what else future_uncertain? I wonder why Vulcan would need to be rediscovered for it to rule a sign? Either it rules the sign or it doesn't. I don't understand what Linda meant by that. What do you think about that? What does anybody say about that? So I don't know why the Virgos would have to wait to "come into their own". It would seem that if Vulcan already exists, then Virgos are already "into their own". (whether their ruler is recognised or not). Also there is another post here that talks about a planet that was discovered at some point that they haven't name yet, I think. http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum2/HTML/000896.html ------------------ Get some love in your groove, just get hip to forgive... - Michael Franks IP: Logged
astro junkie unregistered	posted August 28, 2004 07:27 PM Right, and some people have argued that even Chiron could belong to Virgo. But that's not the way it is interpreted today, not that I'm saying it should be, but that Virgo probably has some more day-to-day attributes than Chiron, since Chiron moves so slowly. IP: Logged
LibraSparkle unregistered	posted August 28, 2004 07:35 PM Hi Silverbells , I can think of a few people here that I would call enlightened. Can't you? IP: Logged
astro junkie unregistered	posted August 28, 2004 08:03 PM rasberry IP: Logged
LibraSparkle unregistered	posted August 28, 2004 08:04 PM AJ... you're repeating yourself IP: Logged
silverbells unregistered	posted August 28, 2004 09:08 PM astro junkie - why would people say that chiron is the ruler of Virgo? How are/were the planets assigned to the signs? I wonder how one could know if a planet is feminine or masculine. Libra Sparkles - I never said there were no enlightened souls here I was just curious as to what qualities and actions constitute enlightenment (contextual meaning, of course) and which ones constitute ignorance. ------------------ Get some love in your groove, just get hip to forgive... - Michael Franks IP: Logged
astro junkie unregistered	posted August 28, 2004 09:46 PM Because Chiron shares a keyword with Virgo - Healing The way it seems names are found, (if it's not the name of the person who found it), is by observing ones surroundings and the tone of the world at the time something new/significant is discovered. Some of it can be mythical, which reflects much truth and wisdom if you know where to find it. It's a very long evolutional process. Not like - ah! Here's - we'll name it - Chiron! And here's a list of what it means astrologically. It doesn't work that way. Astrology is close executively to science in that there is a bit of a (we hope) friendly competition for fame or notoriety. Because it's such a beautiful artform, it allows for these discussions and observations to take hold in the form of an "astrological personality". So sharing data and statistics is extremely important, as is, the human sensitivity required. IP: Logged
purplezen unregistered	posted August 28, 2004 10:47 PM "I wonder why Vulcan would need to be rediscovered for it to rule a sign? Either it rules the sign or it doesn't. I don't understand what Linda meant by that. What do you think about that? What does anybody say about that? So I don't know why the Virgos would have to wait to "come into their own". It would seem that if Vulcan already exists, then Virgos are already "into their own". (whether their ruler is recognised or not)." I like what you said there silverbells. IP: Logged
astro junkie unregistered	posted August 28, 2004 11:14 PM OK - here's a possible scenario. Think of the everything that Virgo represents. Now I'll just take one for an example, health. Now let's say that in the future, there is a dramatic sequence of events tied to health which occurs at the same time, or around the same time, that a new planetary object is discovered. Not every planet is equal here in terms of translation or discovery. IP: Logged
Archer unregistered	posted August 29, 2004 03:05 AM some say chiron being a centaur belongs to sagittarius! ------------------ Neerav IP: Logged
astro junkie unregistered	posted August 29, 2004 04:11 AM Yes that is true. That's why sensitivity is so important in astrology. IP: Logged
future_uncertain Knowflake Posts: 193 From: Registered: May 2009	posted August 29, 2004 06:13 AM I was just wondering. I know lots of Virgos who dont' seem to fit the Virgo type as illustrated in most astrology books. So perhaps Virgos have already "come into their own" so to speak. Just because we don't know about something doesn't mean it doesn't exist... we all know this. But I've never yet met a Virgo who seems "stuffy" to me. I find that most of them are incredibly creative people with lots of sparkle to their personalities! The one thing that I do see repeatedly that goes by the books is the need for order. But otherwise... And by the way, Archer, I didn't interpret your response as rude at all. Of course I'm a Sag, too, so I can appreciate a straight-forward response! ~~Future_Uncertain IP: Logged
future_uncertain Knowflake Posts: 193 From: Registered: May 2009	posted August 29, 2004 06:15 AM Oh... and I forgot about purity. They do all seem to possess this trait, even though some of the least pure people I know are Virgos. Amazing how they pull that off! IP: Logged
Swerve unregistered	posted August 29, 2004 06:50 AM I read that the Mayan temples, which were built against incredibly accurate astronomical calculations, contained artwork or designs depicting the Solar System with all the planets in their relevant positions. Thing is, they had a 10th planet there. I myself, am not too sure where I stand on the Vulcan thing, but Linda seemed convinced. Swerve IP: Logged
lalalinda Moderator Posts: 1120 From: nevada Registered: Apr 2009	posted August 29, 2004 02:15 PM I love it, I love it "beautiful artform" IP: Logged
Archer unregistered	posted August 29, 2004 11:23 PM thanks future. i still dunno how it can be rude? IP: Logged
astro junkie unregistered	posted August 29, 2004 11:37 PM ... hmmmmm ... must have been a typo ... IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time	next newest topic \| next oldest topic
Administrative Options: Close Topic \| Archive/Move \| Delete Topic
	Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com