Author
|
Topic: How do you interpret this celtic cross?
|
UrbaneNomad Newflake Posts: 15 From: Registered: Jun 2011
|
posted July 29, 2012 05:22 PM
I did a general celtic cross spread, without a specific question in mind and i got a very interesting spread. How do you interpret it?Position meanings: 1. You 2. What covers you 3. What crosses you 4. What is beneath you 5. What is behind you 6. What crowns you 7. What is before you 8. Your personality 9. How others see you 10. Your hopes and fears 11. Final outcome Cards: 1. Justice 2. Two of cups 3. Ten of Pents 4. King of Swords 5. Four of Cups 6. Ten of Swords 7. Ten of Cups 8. Chariot 9. Knight of Wands 10. Ace of Pents 11. Knight of Swords IP: Logged |
Chryseis Newflake Posts: 11 From: NOWRA NSW Australia Registered: Jul 2012
|
posted July 29, 2012 08:38 PM
You like to think that you and someone have a really good thing going, that really cannot be corrupted by others.But an overbearing, possibly older guy, though out of the picture, or of less influence somehow, is still shadowing the situation. Or maybe its just the suspicion of past relationships/or a past partner, or could even be an older brother/or father type. There will be a social occasion that will have elements of family and long standing friends, possibly a significant birthday, or something like a welcoming home, or going away, or moving out/housewarming - of someone you know. It will bring forth old memories, and whether or not the guy is there, it will somehow resurface a point of contention, possibly through conversation/presence of others, and you and your valued other will have like a quick flaming tiff, that will sort of remain fairly outwardly controlled, and will die down as quickly as it flared - but it will impact the relationship and get one or both of you taking a different looking at your connection. Definitely jealousy, possessiveness, insecurity, and illusions are part of the drama here. With one of you, possibly you, thinking 'well, they really had me thinking we had the perfect relationship, but I was seriously putting too much trust/love into my picture of them', or something similar. It could even be an online thing, because there is difficulty in determining a sexual dimension here, other than a mentally projected one and there is a heavy dimension of platonic, or perhaps rather, believing something is super ideal, if we just don't get too involved with each other. And the social thing may just be a big interplay of interacting people on the net over some specific theme that has a supportive/celebratory/goodwill feel to it. And the family/long standing element of the people may just be an online community. I would have to say, an underlying theme here is something particular to you. It seems to be that you, like many, feel reasonably skilled and up to the task of building relationships in the element of air, with a little water thrown in for good measure, over a light flame of a bunsen burner. However there is not a lot of earth mixed into the equation, and therefore the relationship fails to get down to a practical interaction. I think you feel the starkness of the day to day will ruin a good relationship, so you tend to keep them on a social level with a bit of distance and room to move - internet relationships would typify this. The picture I get is that you or they, almost have a cutesy manga character, or like one of those Japanese teenagers that dress in the cutest little dress, socks and platform shoes, and have dramatic makeup and cute-as hair. And the reason why it is hard to distinguish who is who, is that there is a merging between you, where you seem to take on the other's persona, like you try to get inside there skin, so you can anticipate what they will like, what they will do and, might I say it - when they will betray you. As ultimately your default setting is that if you want to hold onto them, then they will ultimately betray you. But this is all very much the human condition, so you are not alone by any measure.
IP: Logged |
UrbaneNomad Newflake Posts: 15 From: Registered: Jun 2011
|
posted July 31, 2012 11:22 AM
quote: Originally posted by Chryseis: You like to think that you and someone have a really good thing going, that really cannot be corrupted by others.But an overbearing, possibly older guy, though out of the picture, or of less influence somehow, is still shadowing the situation. Or maybe its just the suspicion of past relationships/or a past partner, or could even be an older brother/or father type. There will be a social occasion that will have elements of family and long standing friends, possibly a significant birthday, or something like a welcoming home, or going away, or moving out/housewarming - of someone you know. It will bring forth old memories, and whether or not the guy is there, it will somehow resurface a point of contention, possibly through conversation/presence of others, and you and your valued other will have like a quick flaming tiff, that will sort of remain fairly outwardly controlled, and will die down as quickly as it flared - but it will impact the relationship and get one or both of you taking a different looking at your connection. Definitely jealousy, possessiveness, insecurity, and illusions are part of the drama here. With one of you, possibly you, thinking 'well, they really had me thinking we had the perfect relationship, but I was seriously putting too much trust/love into my picture of them', or something similar. It could even be an online thing, because there is difficulty in determining a sexual dimension here, other than a mentally projected one and there is a heavy dimension of platonic, or perhaps rather, believing something is super ideal, if we just don't get too involved with each other. And the social thing may just be a big interplay of interacting people on the net over some specific theme that has a supportive/celebratory/goodwill feel to it. And the family/long standing element of the people may just be an online community. I would have to say, an underlying theme here is something particular to you. It seems to be that you, like many, feel reasonably skilled and up to the task of building relationships in the element of air, with a little water thrown in for good measure, over a light flame of a bunsen burner. However there is not a lot of earth mixed into the equation, and therefore the relationship fails to get down to a practical interaction. I think you feel the starkness of the day to day will ruin a good relationship, so you tend to keep them on a social level with a bit of distance and room to move - internet relationships would typify this. The picture I get is that you or they, almost have a cutesy manga character, or like one of those Japanese teenagers that dress in the cutest little dress, socks and platform shoes, and have dramatic makeup and cute-as hair. And the reason why it is hard to distinguish who is who, is that there is a merging between you, where you seem to take on the other's persona, like you try to get inside there skin, so you can anticipate what they will like, what they will do and, might I say it - when they will betray you. As ultimately your default setting is that if you want to hold onto them, then they will ultimately betray you. But this is all very much the human condition, so you are not alone by any measure.
I'm sorry, but this doesn't really make sense to me. Any alternative ideas? IP: Logged |
Chryseis Newflake Posts: 11 From: NOWRA NSW Australia Registered: Jul 2012
|
posted July 31, 2012 06:37 PM
yes, severalany reading will represent a theme and therefore be manifesting particularly to you in variations, but all should apply but if you think that what I wrote does not make sense, then there's no point giving you the concurrent readings of the same cards. IP: Logged |
UrbaneNomad Newflake Posts: 15 From: Registered: Jun 2011
|
posted July 31, 2012 06:48 PM
quote: Originally posted by Chryseis: yes, severalany reading will represent a theme and therefore be manifesting particularly to you in variations, but all should apply but if you think that what I wrote does not make sense, then there's no point giving you the concurrent readings of the same cards.
What I meant is that the interpretation does not seem to relate to me. I didn't mean to offend anyone. Thanks for your input in any case. I appreciate the effort you put into it. IP: Logged | |