Posts: 1219
From: Chennai
Registered: Apr 2001

posted November 07, 2003 01:49 AM         

---

I have heard plenty of comments about astrology, numerology and other arts of prediction being "just superstitious". (I am pretty sure many Knowflakes were accused so by those who are unenlightened ). Is there proof? How anyone can argue these are superstitious? I am sure many of you would have heard such arguments. Post them in Where Superstition Ends

We can prove it is invalid

IP: Logged

Posts: 1987
From: King Arthur's Camelot
Registered: Jun 2002

posted November 07, 2003 02:45 PM         

---

They argue on how astrology, numerology, and other arts of prediction are simply intangible and far-fetched in our most recent scientific knowledge. They can't be proven with any sort of logical calculation nor do they contain any evidence of working. Just because many people have been helped by astrology there is still not enough evidence as to how it's possible. Therefore most scienitists make an assumption that it is a plain coincidence.

It would take Einstien or someone like him, to be able to prove these kinds of metaphysical ideas into a nice little formula. Einstien had certainly done it with time travel.

-StarLover

IP: Logged

Posts: 3936
From: www.Heaven.Home
Registered: Mar 2002

posted November 07, 2003 03:29 PM         

---

Tap into your highers-elf to validate the difference

------------------
If having a soul means being able to feel love and loyalty and gratitude, then animals are better off than a lot of humans. ~James Herriot

IP: Logged

Posts: 16464
From: Columbus, GA USA
Registered: Nov 2000

posted November 08, 2003 01:34 PM         

---

------------------
"Never mentally imagine for another that which you would not want to experience for yourself, since the mental image you send out inevitably comes back to you." Rebecca Clark

IP: Logged