posted March 21, 2003 06:44 PM              

Fukiyama (plagiarizer of Hegel), "It is the end of history, The battle of the ideologies is over. Liberal Democracy has won over communism(Cold War) & fascism(WWII)"

Nations, being Asian, Western or Eastern European, or North or South American (& even Africa once they stabilize) have all started to liberalize their economies & governments in hopes of interconnecting the world & globalizing, which would hopefully raise the bar for standard of living in all third world countries (still theory & still debatable, but so far the theory is working).

Now Rumsfield, probably the staunchest conservative in the government has expressed this ideal since the 80s to liberalize gov'ts when the opportunity presents itself.

Right now they are seeing an opportunity to have this dream realized & possibility the reverse of the "domino theory" of the Cold War will occur. Instead of one democratic gov't falling causing more to fall, one more liberal democratic government rises & then more follow.

Liberalization includes the advocation of a state governed by the people, a gov't elected by the people, & an economy of free trade without government actors that exploit their country's natural resources for their own gain. Essentially liberalize control over economy which spreads the wealth of a country's natural resources among the people.

What Rumsfield, Bush, & the Western gov'ts are genuinely attempted to do is integrate the world as one liberlized democracy & economy where all countries are interconnected & eventually the sovereignty of the "nation-state" (even the USA) yields the a higher int'l authority following the rules of economic prosperity for example: (Which I'll post later)

Destruction of Islamic fundamentalists, War on terrorism, search for oil, disarmament of Iraq, are all faulty reasons to advocate the one greater ideal, that has quite a vision for the future. But one of positivity & a collective prosperity for the world.

I'm sure there are a million & a half arguments to demonize the US & our gov'ts & their political actors which would make this idea seem futile.

But I just wanted to present this vision of the future so people may at least know of it & consider it.

I mean THERE IS a h*e*ll of a lot the governments of the world do not tell the people of the world what their true goals are, they are REALLY EDUCATED & STUDIED in these matters & it wouldn't be too bad to...
just for a moment...
Consider maybe they do have a plan for the future & these pithy events are simply stepping stones to its realization???

posted March 23, 2003 11:30 PM              

There have been very many grand plans formulated for the world in our human history by those who have been "really educated and studied"...
how many designs can you say have gone off according to the best aims?
How many have not come at the cost of a foundation of corpses and lies?

posted November 15, 2006 05:53 PM              

quote:

---

I wouldn't even think of comparing Clinton to Hitler and both were ego maniacs.--pidaua

---

posted November 15, 2006 05:58 PM            

If your going to qoute something try getting everything in context. This is the full thing.

Qoute
'Bush and Hitler: one in the same? I think not. I wouldn't even think of comparing Clinton to Hitler and both were ego maniacs.'

posted November 15, 2006 06:02 PM              

you dont find it hilarious that pid says she wouldnt think of comparing clinton to hitler, and then in the same sentence she does just that?

pid you're a master of comedy!!

posted November 15, 2006 06:11 PM            

I was talking about being ego-driven. If someone is going to be more like a narcissist it would be Clinton. But to compare him to Hitler as a whole would be insipid, much like your sense of humor.

posted November 15, 2006 06:49 PM            

------------------
~
What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the world is immortal"~