Lindaland
  Global Unity
  IRS loses---again

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   IRS loses---again
jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 09, 2003 07:04 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Satursay, August 9, 2003

IRS Loses a Big One

Slapping down an IRS charge that a pilot illegally evaded almost $1 million in income taxes, a federal jury found the defendant not guilty. The Memphis, Tennessee jury found FedEx pilot Vernice Kuglin not guilty of evading income taxes on $920,000, but the question of payment of the taxes was left undecided. "I think it is safe to assume the IRS will attempt civil collection, but she is not guilty of tax evasion," defense attorney Robert Bernhoft of Milwaukee told the Memphis Commercial Appeal.

Rejoiced Kuglin "I feel justified," According to the Commercial Appeal the 58-year-old Kuglin, 58, a pilot for FedEx since 1985, was charged with six counts of tax evasion and faced up to 30 years in prison and $1.5 million in fines if found guilty of filing false W4 forms for the period from 1996 to 2001.

After studying court documents, legal opinions and the federal tax code Kuglin was unable to find anything in the federal tax code that said she was liable for taxes. She wrote to the IRS twice in 1995 asking questions but said she didn't get a response, the Appeal reported.

Although the government argued that Kuglin had an opportunity to discuss her situation with the IRS to learn what she owed and what documents she was required to file she failed to do so.

Defense attorney Larry Becraft of Huntsville, Ala., said Kuglin decided mandatory payment of income taxes "did not apply to her ..." After the verdict Friday, Becraft said the federal tax code is a confusing conglomeration that "at best is a walking due process violation," and noted that the average American simply doesn't understand the tax code.

Juror Barbara Snodgras of Memphis told the Appeal that the jury did not convict because "we all felt that the prosecution didn't prove its case."

When asked if she planned to start paying federal income taxes again, Kuglin told the newspaper: "I will pay all the taxes for which I am liable."
http://www.gomemphis.com/mca/local_news/article/0,1426,MCA_437_2169609,00.html

IP: Logged

N_wEvil
unregistered
posted August 09, 2003 07:14 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
down with taxes!!!

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 4782
From: The Goober Galaxy
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 10, 2003 01:32 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
She should have demanded that the W-4s not be admitted in court due to being compelled (if you don't file them, you are punished by having the maximum tax stolen from your pay by distraint). Case over! But nothing is certain with today's corrupt judiciary.

------------------
"Never mentally imagine for another that which you would not want to experience for yourself, since the mental image you send out inevitably comes back to you." Rebecca Clark

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 11, 2003 01:07 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
True Randall, the filing of a W-4 is in reality a request for the company to payroll deduct money from what's due to you. In other words, it's a trap most people fall into and if you're working for an employer, it's almost impossible to avoid. Filing a false W-4 overstating dependents gives the IRS another way to prosecute "taxpayers."

There's a lot more talk now about a national sales tax, the elimination of the income tax and the IRS.

jwhop

IP: Logged

N_wEvil
unregistered
posted August 11, 2003 05:52 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
If this case was in the UK it prolly wouldn't have even gone to court - Inland Revenue would have just repossessed her.. soul or something.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 11, 2003 08:22 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Well, repossessing her soul sounds a little drastic. Don't know anything about the Inland Revenue Code but here, the IRS passes out brochures saying the Income Tax is based on "self assessment" and "voluntary compliance."

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 4782
From: The Goober Galaxy
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 11, 2003 08:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
And the payroll tax isn't even the same thing as the income tax (though even most IRS agents think they are).

------------------
"Never mentally imagine for another that which you would not want to experience for yourself, since the mental image you send out inevitably comes back to you." Rebecca Clark

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 11, 2003 09:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
IRS agents have benefitted from very selective training and don't have a clue what's contained in Title 26 USC.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2011

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a