posted August 30, 2004 03:02 PM            

Ballad Of The French Berets
August 18, 2004
Ann Coulter

There ought to be a special word -- something German -- to describe the feeling of revulsion normal people experience when reading lines like these from a single article on John Kerry by Laura Blumenfeld in The Washington Post:

-- "Kerry's complexity has been an issue since his national debut in 1971."

-- "Kerry likes to quote the French writer Andre Gide: 'Don't try to understand me too quickly.'"

-- "His friend Dan Barbiero said it comes down to Kerry's complexity ..."

(Apparently, Kerry's answers on the LSAT were too nuanced and complex for the Harvard Law School admissions committee: Despite all his connections, fancy education and war-protesting, Kerry couldn't get into Harvard Law School and went to Boston College Law School instead. Wait -- didn't Kerry throw that famous, game-winning "Hail Mary" pass while playing quarterback for Boston College back in the '80s? Or am I thinking of somebody else? Let's ask Doug Brinkley!)

-- "Flying to his next campaign stop, he chatted about maneuvers to avoid flak in combat."

-- "This was Primal John ... who ran with the bulls at Pamplona and, when trampled, got up, chased the bull, and grabbed for its horns."

(I'm almost sure this was a polite reference to John and Teresa's honeymoon night.)

The problem with a suck-up press for Democrats is that with no adversary press to call them on it, Democrats develop wilder and wilder Walter Mitty fantasy lives until finally one day, when they are at the zenith of their political careers, someone notices that they're not Irish, they didn't deserve their war medals, 254 Swift Boat veterans hate them, and they didn't spend Christmas Eve, 1968, in Cambodia. (Or that they are white-trash serial molesters and unrepentant rapists who somehow talked their way into an Arkansas governorship.)

The Boston Globe biography of Kerry published earlier this year compliantly repeats Kerry's yarn about how he spent Christmas 1968 in Cambodia "despite President Nixon's assurances that there was no combat action in this neutral territory."

Only recently did someone point out: (1) Kerry was 55 miles away from the Cambodian border on Christmas 1968 and (2) Nixon wasn't president in 1968. (How did "historian" Doug Brinkley miss that in his biography of Kerry?)

The media will spend weeks going through pay stubs for Bush's National Guard service in Alabama in the waning days of war, but if Kerry tells them exotic tales of covert missions into Cambodia directed by Richard Nixon, they don't even bother to fact-check who was president in December 1968.

Tom Harkin, Crazed Moron, was shouting this week that Dick Cheney is a "coward," evidently for not fighting in Vietnam like Harkin. Except Harkin didn't fight in Vietnam either! The last time Harkin was bragging about his Vietnam service was in 1984 when he told David Broder of The Washington Post: "I spent five years as a Navy pilot, starting in November of 1962. One year was in Vietnam. I was flying F-4s and F-8s on combat air patrols and photo-reconnaissance support missions."

Sen. Barry Goldwater -- not the Post -- checked with the Defense Department and soon Harkin was forced to admit he had never been in combat in Vietnam, but was based in Japan during the war, ferrying damaged planes from the Saigon airport to Japan for repairs. Oops!

Then there was Al Gore who, like Kerry, was in Vietnam just long enough to get photos for his future political campaigns. (Apparently all future Democratic politicians take cameras to war zones.)

Gore enlisted in the Army in 1970 in a calculated gambit to help his senator dad in an election year. Young Al was given a cushy job writing for the Stars and Stripes newspaper, a bodyguard, and an exit strategy when Pops lost the election. After five months of this hygienic tour of duty, Little Lord Fauntleroy asked to come home, and before long he was safe and sound and preparing to flunk out of divinity school and then drop out of law school.

But over the next 30 years, Gore provided the media with increasingly macho reminiscences of his combat experiences in Vietnam -- almost as vivid and stirring as the impassioned account he gave of being a tobacco farmer.

-- "I pulled my turn on the perimeter at night and walked through the elephant grass and I was fired upon." (The Baltimore Sun)

-- "I took my turn regularly on the perimeter in these little firebases out in the boonies. Something would move, we'd fire first and ask questions later." (Vanity Fair)

-- "I was shot at. I spent most of my time in the field." (The Washington Post)

I think someone needs to explain to the Democrats that having your picture taken is not what most veterans mean by "being shot at."

During World War II, then-congressman Lyndon Johnson went on a single flight -- as an observer -- for which he was awarded the Silver Star by Gen. Douglas MacArthur. Only recently has it been exposed that the medal was a complete fraud, probably awarded by MacArthur to curry favor with a congressman.

At the time, no one in the press bothered to investigate why Johnson was the only member of the crew to receive any sort of decoration for the 13-minute flight that never came under enemy fire -- and on which Johnson was merely an "observer." For the rest of his life Johnson got away with wearing what historian David Halberstam called "the least deserved and most proudly displayed Silver Star in military history."

Johnson told harrowing tales of his uneventful 13-minute flight, boasting that the men had called him "Raider Johnson." One time he harangued a congressman on foreign aid, saying: "I know foreign aid is unpopular, but I didn't want to go to the Pacific in '41 after Pearl Harbor, but I did. I didn't want to let those Japs shoot at me ... but I did."

The sole surviving member of the crew, Ret. Staff Sgt. Bob Marshall, U.S. Army, a gunner on the plane, disputed Johnson's story about being attacked by Japanese Zeros: "No way. No, that story was made up ... we had never seen a Zero. It was never attacked. There was nothing."

If only talk radio and cable TV had been around in the '60s, we'd be able to hear James Carville call Bob Marshall a liar and watch the Democratic National Committee threaten to sue any TV station that aired his story.
http://www.anncoulter.org/columns/2004/081804.htm

posted August 30, 2004 03:27 PM              

You can find just as much crap to sling about Bush on the net as anyone else.

Let's not forget that, JW

posted August 30, 2004 04:12 PM            

I don't consider factual information to be $hit. But, you're free to question the factual content of Ann Coulter's article and I hope you do.

The Hurricane totally missed my area. No rain and no wind beyond a gentle breeze.

posted August 31, 2004 11:48 PM              

-Bush was in the Air National Gaurd for a bit, and then he went AWOL and was never heard from again. Looks good on a resume- if you don't dig too deep. Daddy's boy.

-Cheney got a number of deferments for, what was it, a bad back. Draft-dodging slacker.

-Neither Rumsfeld nor Ashcroft nor any other prominent Administration member I know of has any military service at all.

These people are real good patriots-at-the-rear. What say we give them some guns and send them to hunt down Osama? Or what about their children? Hey, why doesn't Mary Cheney really back up her father politically and enlist in the Marines? She'd get to find out all about the don't-ask-don't-tell policy from the inside.

Kerry, on the other hand, actually served, and was well decorated for his service. Don't believe those Swfit Boat Goons for Bush. Many of them went on the record just a few years before saying what a great guy Kerry was, but now that their organization is being funded by Bush's friends, they can't wait to contradict themselves and say what a fake Kerry is. They all, of course, are lying through their teeth. Kerry is a wonderful patriot. He served his country on the front lines, then came home and protested against a misled, wasteful war.

posted September 01, 2004 02:29 AM            

Where?!

posted September 02, 2004 01:09 AM              

Everything I posted is factual. Until you can prove otherwise, you have lost.

posted September 02, 2004 12:39 PM              

It is a well known fact that Kerry given all that he knows now about the war, still said he would have voted FOR the war. It's actually an advantage for Kerry that the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth are complaining about him, so then we're not talking about how Kerry actually agrees with the president. He never went against the war that was Howard Dean. Now Kerry comes back with a new statement saying he would have done everything differently with the war than Bush. Blah blah blah.

posted September 02, 2004 07:49 PM              

To move on --- QS, the fact that Cheney had a bad back does not necessarily make him a draft dodger. I was in Quantico with a guy who had a bad elbow (no joke!) and was sent straight home from OCS, meaning that he had lost out (that particular year) on a chance to become a comissioned officer. He was ALREADY a Staff Sergeant in the Marine Corps and he was STILL rejected. The physical requirements for passing muster in the military are by no means a walk in the park. Though, I admit - they have made it SOMEWHAT easier for women. Believe it or not, I know of a couple of would-be enlistees who were turned away due to excessive tatoos! The military is a world all its own with its own rules. It is best not to speak with absolute authority where the military is concerned unless one has intimate first-hand knowledge of what goes on. Even then, caution should be exercised.

But this is a small matter in comparison to others, namely Kerry's protest against the Vietnam War (and also the war in Iraq). On the face of it, there is nothing wrong with protesting a war. However, he presented those who served in Vietnam as wholesale slaughterers of women and children, to say nothing of his other accusations. While these types of things are reported to have happened, he presents it as the "norm", as the "standard" so to speak. Meanwhile, American soldiers were rotting in their own filth for YEARS in Hanoi, subject to brutal and innumerable tortures courtesy of the Vietnamese government. Many died or were outright tortured to death. Where were the protesters maligning the Vietnamese? Why were the American soldiers painted as common criminals in their entirety? And if Kerry truly believes this, why did he apply for his medals in the first place only to discard them later? This seems to me a case of wanting your cake and eating it to. (Or just plain throwing it away). Would he not have been ashamed to even be serving alongside those who so disgraced the uniform? I think these are valid questions to ask.

posted September 02, 2004 09:53 PM              

Whoopty ding freaking dong!

He's a million miles from reality NO CARE FOR YOU NO CARE FOR ME. Blast on thunder spaceship, Cheney.