posted November 11, 2004 01:50 AM              

http://img103.exs.cx/img103/4526/exit_poll.gif

Interesting that where there were paper ballots, the exit polls matched elections results....

...but when electronic machines were used, exit polls that favored Kerry gave Bush the votes.....hmmmmmm

posted November 12, 2004 12:40 AM              

Just a suggestion but maybe you could send this to moveon.org they are looking for things like this. The more info they have the better. They will check it out for authencity.

I believe this and things were so messed up in North Carolina that they are calling for a new election. They had a bunch of ballots get wet even. But they say the new election will be for local candidates only. Not the presidential election. That is not a call they can make.

posted November 12, 2004 01:00 AM              

quote:

---

they worked real hard to make sure the exit polls were accurate this election because of the 2000 elections. Funny how when Bush and Cheney are running for office the numbers just never add up no matter what they do or how hard they try.

---

Ya got that right, Mirandee!

posted November 13, 2004 01:52 AM              

In "The Unexplained Exit Poll Discrepancy," Dr. Steven F. Freeman says:

"As much as we can say in social science that something is impossible, it is impossible that the discrepancies between predicted and actual vote counts in the three critical battleground states [Ohio, Florida, and Pennsylvania] of the 2004 election could have been due to chance or random error."

The odds of those exit poll statistical anomalies occurring by chance are, according to Freeman, "250,000,000 to one." That's 250 MILLION to ONE.

He concludes the paper with this:

"Systematic fraud or mistabulation is a premature conclusion, but the election's unexplained exit poll discrepancies make it an unavoidable hypothesis, one that is the responsibility of the media, academia, polling agencies, and the public to investigate."