Lindaland
  Global Unity
  Bush set to dismantle 30 years of environmental protections

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Bush set to dismantle 30 years of environmental protections
Harpyr
Newflake

Posts: 0
From: Alaska
Registered: Jun 2010

posted December 05, 2004 01:33 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Harpyr     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Y'know.. everyone says that no Republican wants to see more pollution but you sure wouldn't know that from the way they destroy protections against environmental degradation...

This is clearly not the will of the people but the will of the corporations. Fecking sellouts is all our polititians are these days.

Bush Sets Out Plan to Dismantle 30 Years of Environmental Laws
by Geoffrey Lean in Washington

George Bush's new administration, and its supporters controlling Congress, are setting out to dismantle three decades of US environmental protection.

We will now see an assault on the law which will set the US in the direction of becoming a Third World country in terms of environmental protection.

Philip Clapp, president of the National Environmental Trust
In little over a month since his re-election, they have announced that they will comprehensively rewrite three of the country's most important environmental laws, open up vast new areas for oil and gas drilling, and reshape the official Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

They say that the election gave them a mandate for the measures - which, ironically, will overturn a legislative system originally established by the Republican Presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford - even though Mr Bush went out of his way to avoid emphasizing his environmental plans during his campaign.

"The election was a validation of the philosophy and the agenda," said Mike Leavitt, the Bush-appointed head of the EPA. He points out that over a third of the agency's staff will become eligible for retirement over the President's four-year term, enabling him to fill it with people lenient to polluters.

The administration's first priority is the controversial plan to open up the Arctic Wildlife Refuge for oil drilling. Two years ago the Senate defeated plans to exploit the refuge - home to caribou, polar bears , musk oxen and millions of migratory birds - by 52 votes to 48.

But with the election of four Republican senators in favor of the drilling, and the disappearance of one who opposed it, the administration now has the votes for victory.

It plans to follow with an energy bill - also defeated in the last Congress - which would investigate vast new tracts for exploitation for oil and gas. It will also encourage the building of nuclear power stations, halted since the 1979 Three Mile Island accident.

Far more radical measures are also under way. Joe Barton, the Texas Republican chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, who is to help push through the energy bill, has also announced a comprehensive review of the Clean Air Act, one of the world's most successful environmental laws.

Environmentalists predict the emasculation of the Act, which has cut air pollution across the country by more than half over the last 30 years. Not to be outdone, the Republican chairman of the House Resources Committee, Richard Pombo, has announced a review of the Endangered Species Act, for the protection of wildlife. The law has been the main obstacle to the felling of much of the US's remaining endangered rain forest. And in a third assault, Congressional leaders have also announced an attack on the National Environmental Policy Act, which requires details of the environmental effects of major developments before they proceed.

Philip Clapp, president of the National Environmental Trust, said last week that the previous Bush administration had largely contented itself with weakening environmental legislation, but the new one intended to go much further. He added: "We will now see an assault on the law which will set the US in the direction of becoming a Third World country in terms of environmental protection."

The environmentalists point out that almost every local referendum on environmental issues carried out on election day achieved a green majority.

They recall the fate of the assault on environmental law - headed by the former Congressional Speaker, Newt Gingrich, in the mid 1990s - which caused such opposition that Congress enacted tough new green legislation.

Published on Sunday, December 5, 2004 by the lndependent/UK

IP: Logged

BlueRoamer
Knowflake

Posts: 95
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted December 08, 2004 12:39 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for BlueRoamer     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I don't think its so much that Bush wants to destroy the environment, its just that his favorism to his big business buddies takes precedent. Bush and his cabinet serve the almighty dollar, and unfortunately, not mother nature.

IP: Logged

BugginOut6106
unregistered
posted December 10, 2004 10:25 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yes, but Bushie has the power to curb this degradation. Agreed he is a puppet. Nothing ever gets pinned on the guy. Due to that he always gets away with his capers. This philosophy is disturbing. 4 of 15 cabinet positions remain. The new energy pick cabinet member should have a background in progressive thinking, not old ways of generating energy. Coal is caustic, and so are energy plants that create waste for future generations.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2011

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a