|
Author
|
Topic: They are related to.....
|
Mystic Dreamz
unregistered
|
posted February 14, 2005 12:06 AM
 
They do have evidence in case you didn't read.
You never answer questions.
IP: Logged |
miss_apples
unregistered
|
posted February 14, 2005 12:19 PM
How does the Bush family have ties to Nazi's?IP: Logged |
Mystic Dreamz
unregistered
|
posted February 14, 2005 12:57 PM
Another example of an american idiot. They never know anything.IP: Logged |
jwhop
Knowflake Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 14, 2005 01:02 PM
Yes, preventable and unnecessary accidents. Hmmm, well the mantra of the left is that US forces shouldn't be in Iraq in the first place. So, viewed in that light, those accidental deaths of journalists are preventable. War itself is preventable...all one need do is surrender immediately when a dictator threatens...problem of war solved. I'm pretty sure all airhead leftists can see and agree with the logic and reason of that solution to war.This is the answer to your question of how many thousands of people were killed as a result of Clinton launching a missile attack on a pill plant in the Sudan. Made even more egregious by the fact Clinton took the action to get Monica and her Grand Jury testimony off the front pages of America's newspapers and off the nightly news...hourly in the case of CNN. ‘TURNING THE OTHER CHEEK’: THE DIRECT COSTS
The airstrike on Sudan destroyed a pharmaceutical factory which produced half of Sudan’s pharmaceutical supplies. It specialised in producing drugs to kill the parasites which pass from herds to herders, ‘one of Sudan’s principal causes of infant motality.’ (James Astill, ‘Strike one’, Guardian, 2 Oct. 2001) Sudan could not afford to import drugs to replace the supplies formerly produced at the factory, and was also under sanctions. US journalist Jonathan Belke reported a year after the attack that as a result of the destruction of the pharmaceutical factory ‘tens of thousands of people – many of them children – have suffered and died from malaria, tuberculosis, and other treatable diseases. (Boston Globe, 22 Aug. 1999) Noam Chomsky remarks that if these consequences were scaled up to be proportional to the US population, it would be as if the bin Laden network, in a single attack on the US, caused ‘hundreds of thousands of people – many of them children – to suffer and die from easily treatable diseases.’ (9-11, p. 51).......
http://www.j-n-v.org/AW_briefings/JNV_briefing058.htm IP: Logged |
miss_apples
unregistered
|
posted February 14, 2005 04:45 PM
Geez, cant ask a simple question....But if Bush has blood line ties to nazi's, that doesnt neccesarily mean he is evil. I am of German decent and granted my family has been here since the late 1800's still Im sure I had some blood lines in the 30's and 40's that may or may not have supported the Nazi regime. We cant control what our ancestors did in the past. My fathers family were also plantation and slave owners. Does that make me evil even though I myself have never or would ever own a slave? Just because my ancestors did. IP: Logged |
Petron
unregistered
|
posted February 14, 2005 05:52 PM
Do you also call Bill Clinton a murderer for killing a couple of thousand people at a pill factory in the middle east? --jwhop
lol
IP: Logged |
jwhop
Knowflake Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 16, 2005 11:02 AM
No, I know the definition of murder....in contrast to some.  I've also resisted the temptation to connect Clinton to the deaths of all those "friends of Bill" who committed suicide or otherwise departed this mortal coil under mysterious circumstances; even when it appeared those dear departed had damning information about Bill and Hill. My position is that Commander Corruption is the most corrupt president to ever sit in the Oval Office and that opinion is shared by a panel of historians who conducted a year long study of all American Presidents for CSPAN. Further, in the general pubic poll, part of the same series by CSPAN, they also voted Clinton most corrupt. IP: Logged |
pidaua
Knowflake Posts: 67
From: Back in AZ with Bear the Leo
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 16, 2005 03:34 PM
No Miss_Apples, you are not evil. Neither is our President.If most people look into their geneology, such as the loud mouths against Bush here, they would see criminals in their background. It is inevitable as we are all human. Humans are prone to corruption and violence- even if raised by wolves. Think about it... is there ANY race that has not enslaved another? Is there ANY race, tribe or culture that has not conquered another at some time? We think of American Indians as peace loving, pipe-smoking granola crunchers, but that is far from the truth. Some of the most horrible torture methods are borne out of what my (and other ancestors) did to their enemies. From the Bushmen of Africa to the Vikings and including the Asians..etc... ALL of these people have committed atrocities.. Does that mean we have to hold the decendants of Khan responsible? Do we say- Hey, you are decended from Cochise, who happened to order the torture of my great, great, great grandfather..so now you must pay and be evil? LOL...Hell, my own line decends from Apache, Cherokee, Spanish and German. ALL 4 of those nationalities DID something to cause pain and death to someone else. This argument is old, outdated and ridiculous. BUT..is is also indicative of the intelligence level of those that perpetuate it..or should I say, lack of intelligence. IP: Logged |
Mystic Dreamz
unregistered
|
posted February 16, 2005 07:27 PM
Well let's thank monica for distracting him or else the new world order would have set in a long time ago.
Now it is the begining.
IP: Logged | |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
