posted March 23, 2006 11:30 PM            

quote:

---

Let's just clear up a few FACTS.

---

Clear up? What does Bush getting the most votes ever have to do with the Pew Research poll? Nothing.

If you want to clear up something why don't you be fair about the presidential election in which John Kerry ALSO got more votes than any previous presidential candidate?

Don't try to sensationalize things that aren't in any way sensational.

quote:

---

I'm willing to await the outcome of the next Congressional elections...which is the ONLY poll that matters. How about you acoustic?

---

posted March 23, 2006 11:54 PM              

quote:

---

What did Coulter actually say herself?

---

I don't actually know because I didn't read the book...as you know, I was quoting Brock's opinion...

...and for your info jwhop....I don't worship "commander corruption" (altho he is kinda cute)....or his wife...

In the past, I did have some respect for them, but from things I'm learning, they are probably as corrupt as bush and company...

So there...

posted March 23, 2006 11:54 PM            

Another fact you need to face it that elections are the best indicator of what people actually think about candidates or incumbents.

I'm sorry you can't make the connection with Bush being elected and reelected and that those polls are a true indicator of public opinion.

Another fact you need to face is that the polls you like to post are cooked, crooked and taken to produce a desired political result.

I noticed the Pew poll you posted didn't say a damned thing about the political affiliation breakdown of those polled. For all we know, it was as cooked and crooked as the AP polls you are so fond of..polls which oversample democrats to produce the desired political result.

I agree with you that the outcome of the next election is uncertain and that's the reason I suggest we wait and see.

posted March 24, 2006 01:05 AM            

If Pew wanted to skew the results for political reasons, wouldn't it want to do so for all polls containing political elements?

posted March 24, 2006 01:12 AM              

quote:

---

Really Rainbow? Why don't you lay out the case for the Bush and company corruption?

---

Gee... Thought I did that already...about a zillion times...*sigh*

posted March 28, 2006 02:33 AM              

Oh my! Rather drastic, no?

**************************************

posted March 28, 2006 09:40 AM            

Unlike Penn, Coulter doesn't need Voodoo Dolls to skewer the "I hate America" crowd. Just knowing Coulter is out there, that she has their number and will in due course, get around to exposing their hypocrisy and leftist lies is the infliction of sufficient pain.

As for Sean Penn's father, he was a communist and got exactly what he deserved for plotting against the United States in favor of the Soviet Union.

"Leo Penn was questioned about, among other things, his attending of a meeting- not a union meeting, a Communist Party USA meeting. Because he was in fact a member of the Communist Party USA. Leo Penn was not blacklisted by HUAC, because HUAC did not blacklist anyone. They only indicted people for perjury or contempt of court- that being a legal remedy- while "blacklisting" is not. Leo Penn was blacklisted by the Motion Picture Association of America, the private group representing the American film industry."

"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leo_Penn"

BTW Rainbow

posted March 28, 2006 12:13 PM            

How anyone can support that is psychotic as well.

jwhop, you can wait for a thousand years and we both know that Rainbow will never lay out a cohesive argument. You're lucky if you get an animated smiley face or another non sequitor post concerning Bush and the moon. LMAO....

**** and Rainbow, here is a disclaimer for you. Just because I gave an EXAMPLE of Bush and the moon does not mean I said you posted about Bush and the Moon. I know your response will most likely be "Well, that just shows how much you know pid because I NEVER said anything about Bush and the moon".

posted March 28, 2006 02:29 PM              

quote:

---

**** and Rainbow, here is a disclaimer for you. Just because I gave an EXAMPLE of Bush and the moon does not mean I said you posted about Bush and the Moon. I know your response will most likely be "Well, that just shows how much you know pid because I NEVER said anything about Bush and the moon

---

But Pid, you did chide me for calling poor little Annie...that outlandish name - GASH LIMBAUGH....

In case you've forgotten, here's exactly what you said....

quote:

---

Rainbow,
The fact that you repeated that (and giggled) is a reflection on the kind of person that you are. The term "Gash" is as offensive as the word "C*nt" when used in that manner. I thought you had more self-respect than to do something like that - then again, had someone used that term to describe you I'd bet you have a full tizzy fit equipt with croc tears and such. LMAO. I wouldn't even use that offensive word to describe Hilary or Ms. Palosi.

---

......but look at the name calling our pure, sweet, poor little Annie did......

....from the book BLINDED BY THE RIGHT

quote:

---

.....Ann moved on to become a televison pundit, where she crafted a niche for herself, as a "poster girl for the militia crowd," as New York magazine put it. In her television appearances, Ann regularly labeled Clinton as "crazy," "like a serial killer," "creepier and slimer than Kennedy," "a horny hick," and "white trash."

(Holy name calling, Pid, what do you think of that? )

"I think it's a rational question for Americans to ask if their persident is insane," she declared. "I just want to get rid of him."

To Ann, Hillary Clinton was a "prostitite."

---

And Pid, although Ms. Coulter never even saw my little obscure mention of the reference to her as - GASH LIMBAUGH, it seems to me that if the chick can dish it out....she'd ought to be able to take it... and needs no one defending her...that broad is one tough cookie....

double standard here????

posted March 28, 2006 03:16 PM              

quote from Pid, again...*sigh*

quote:

---

jwhop, you can wait for a thousand years and we both know that Rainbow will never lay out a cohesive argument. You're lucky if you get an animated smiley face or another non sequitor post concerning Bush and the moon. LMAO....

---

posted March 28, 2006 03:44 PM            

You sure could have used it against me if I was as stupid minded as you to call someone gash or quote any other person saying "oh.. Ann Coulter called Hilary a prostitute".

Did I state that? No, I did say that calling someone gash is as offensive as calling someone a c*nt.. but you can't recognize the difference because like the hypocrit that you ARE it only matters if SOMEONE else says it - not you.

You can try to defend yourself all you want, but you posted the offensive term and giggled about it, as though YOU said something witty and with intellect. We both know that is out of your league and YOU just showed the type of person that you are with what you DID say and in your response to me.

Hell, one can see how emotionally raging you became by posting 4 posts in a row to try to make a point. Hey honey -think about using the edit button maybe once in a while ....

And for the record, what in the HELL does the disclaimer about Bush and the Moon have to do with chastizing you (NOT CHIDING) for using such a derogatory name for another woman? Damn woman, do you need more medication or are you having a problem following a line of thought?

Regarding the exchange between you and jwhop. This is a public message board as you have informed me over and over. If you make statements concerning who is doing what (and pretending you have some sort of evidence) then I have the right to challenge you on producing those facts / statistics.

The truth is, and I am sure YOU are aware of this, YOU don't have any substantial facts to produce. You wouldn't even begin to research the lies that you post because as you have stated numerous times "I don't have the time to look all that information up" Just like many of the others that post lies or mistruths, you just post them and then leave or come up with absurd commentaries (or as I have stated before, your little bouncing icons) and leave it at that.

Real intelligent.. yep..

posted March 28, 2006 03:46 PM              

quote:

---

BTW Rainbow

When are you going to lay out the case for the Bush and company corruption. You know, actions Bush and company have taken to benefit themselves or their families. Please be specific and state the law(s) which were violated

---

OMG jwhop! That is sooooo far reaching that it's going to take more than one post to cover it....and lord knows besides taking a zillion and one posts, there's probably so much more to be discovered about our dictator and his cronies.....

I'll have to decide where to start first....

posted March 28, 2006 03:49 PM            

Do you think she will meet the same demise as the Fembots when Austin Powers used his Mojo on them? Ears smoking, head spinning.. until POOF....

Will there be a POT of GOLD at the END of RAINBOW?

posted March 28, 2006 03:51 PM              

I was NOT addressing you....

posted March 28, 2006 03:54 PM            

Hmmm... or maybe that is the first sign..... irrational behaviour followed by irrational posts, leading to smoke coming out the ears, uncontrollable twitches and BAM......

HAA HAAAAAAA... what's the matter Rainbow, you can dish it out but ya can't take it?

let's see how long it takes you to post the facts.... as Hannibal Lector says... "Tick... Tock.... Tick... Tock...."

posted March 28, 2006 03:55 PM            

This may be a little over the top.

quote:

---

Clinton as "crazy," "like a serial killer," ;"creepier and slimer than Kennedy," "a horny hick," and "white trash."

---

I recall an incident where Kennedy and Chris Dodd split a waitress under a restaurant table in Washington. And of course, who could forget the heroics of the Hero of Chappaquiddick?

As for the rest of what Coulter said, I think she failed to make a strong enough case against Commander Corruption.

Thanks for reminding my Pid

Rainbow

When are you going to get around to laying out the case by chapter and verse against Bush and company corruption?

posted March 28, 2006 04:39 PM              

quote:

---

HAA HAAAAAAA... what's the matter Rainbow, you can dish it out but ya can't take it?

---

Stop stealing my lines....can't you come up with something original, Ms. Pid???

(I used that line a few posts back when referring to Ann Coulter and her namecalling.)

posted March 28, 2006 04:43 PM              

quote:

---

Well, since you say you can, how long are you going to keep me waiting?

---

Hey...Rome wasn't built in a day....and besides today is my grandson's birthday and I have better things to do....

...but have no fear...you've not heard the last from me on this....

....and.....

I also don't need any wisecracks from the peanut gallery.....

So persons not addressed kindly keep your silly remarks to yourself...

posted March 28, 2006 04:53 PM              

Last time there were several....

I think I can take it....

posted March 28, 2006 05:02 PM            

2) Herd mentality does not apply in this situation, but I would not expect you to know that. Funny, you would have no problem if 8 or 9 of your libby friends jumped on your bandwagon, but jwhop and I agree on something and you conveniently cry "herd mentality"

According to the dictionary a HERD is:

A large number of people; a crowd: a herd of stranded passengers.
The multitude of common people regarded as a mass: “It is the luxurious and dissipated who set the fashions which the herd so diligently follow” (Henry David Thoreau). See Synonyms at flock1.

A LARGE number of people Rainbow.. .or a MULTITUDE of common people....etc.. mass...

Get it... 1 + 1 does not equal a MULTITUDE

Keep trying! And FOR THE RECORD.... WHAT SEVERAL? There are only a few people here that lean towards the right - jwhop, isis and myself. Lotus is pretty in the middle.