Lindaland
  Global Unity
  For Those that Extol the Praises of Sicko Charlie Sheen

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   For Those that Extol the Praises of Sicko Charlie Sheen
pidaua
Knowflake

Posts: 67
From: Back in AZ with Bear the Leo
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 21, 2006 07:53 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for pidaua     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen1.html

Charlie Sheen Divorce Bombshell
Wife: Drugs, hookers, threats, gambling, porn on actor's plate


APRIL 21--In a searing court attack on Charlie Sheen, actress Denise Richards alleges that her estranged husband is unstable, violent, addicted to gambling and prostitutes, and visits pornographic web sites featuring young men and girls who appear underage. In a remarkable sworn declaration (a copy of which you'll find below) filed today in Los Angeles Superior Court, Richards also charges that Sheen, 40, assaulted her and threatened her life during a December 30 incident at the actress's Los Angeles home.


Richards claims that an enraged Sheen--who was over for a visit with the couple's two children--told her she was "******* with the wrong guy" and called her a series of vulgar names in front of the children. The actor, Richards said, then shoved her to the ground and screamed, "I hope you f--king die, ***** ." As Richards, 35, tells it, Sheen was angry because she had told her divorce attorney about discovering details of Sheen's porn-surfing practices. Richards's declaration, filed in support of her request for a restraining order against Sheen, contends that Sheen "belonged" to "disturbing" sites "which promoted very young girls, who looked underage to me with pigtails, braces, and no pubic hair performing oral sex with each other." Other sites visited by Sheen, Richards alleges, involved "gay pornography also involving very young men who also did not look like adults."


Richards claims that she also discovered that Sheen "belonged to several sex search type sites" on which he "looked for women to have sex with." His online profile, Richards adds, included a photo of "his erect penis." The Richards evisceration also portrays Sheen as a lousy father who urged her to abort their first child. And, when she was about to give birth to their second child via a C-section, Sheen's attention was "diverted to his pager for the results of his betting." (17 pages)

_______________________________________


Yeah, this is a guy who has wonderful judgement. I wonder if he has played out his "pedophilic fantasies" yet.

Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

IP: Logged

Petron
unregistered
posted April 21, 2006 08:19 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
never liked him either...i could never see why denise richards would go for that......i'd kick his @55 ....

or maybe jwhop wants to put a bullet in his head.....

IP: Logged

TINK
unregistered
posted April 21, 2006 09:02 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I'm not a fan myself but celebrity gossip shouldn't sway anyone's opinion.

IP: Logged

pidaua
Knowflake

Posts: 67
From: Back in AZ with Bear the Leo
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 24, 2006 12:17 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for pidaua     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Not really just gossip TINK - she filed a sworn affidavit and the filing attorney has to have some evidence (or else a slander case ensues).

Although it is not unheard of for people to exaggerate during divorce proceedings or when filing legal documents, I would say that in this case the plantiff filed after checking all her p's and q's.

I had to deal with a similar situation with my ex-fiance and basically printed out his "less that desirable" profiles on even lesser than desirable websites. Let's just say like Ms. Richards, the body part in question was undeniably belonging to the said person.

Chances are, she printed up the websites, with his profiles, a copy of his history and any other information she could to prove his "extra-maritial" hobbies.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 24, 2006 02:26 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Actor Charlie Sheen denies abuse charges by ex-wife
Sat Apr 22, 2006 9:45pm ET
http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=domesticNews&storyid=2006-04-23T031406Z_01_N22177268_RTRUKOC_0_US-SHEEN.xml&rpc=22

Well, of course Sheen denies all the allegations but I agree with Pid; there has to be some basis for the allegations or it would be divorce and legal suicide to make them in a sworn court document...affidavit.

IP: Logged

TINK
unregistered
posted April 24, 2006 08:12 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Dear God, do I find myself in the position of defending Charlie Sheen?! ick.

A very public celebrity divorce is a different animal than your experience, pid. If Ms Richards has an ounce of brain matter she'll accuse him of just what she did to throw the bad press his way. Right or wrong, his career is ruined. And I imagine that was her mission.

IP: Logged

Aphrodite
unregistered
posted April 24, 2006 09:05 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
What a frightening report filed.

IP: Logged

Rainbow~
unregistered
posted April 24, 2006 09:12 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Right or wrong, his career is ruined. And I imagine that was her mission.

Perfect timing!

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 24, 2006 10:58 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Dear God, do I find myself in the position of defending Charlie Sheen?! ick.

Charlie probably appreciates your support TINK

Now why would anyone think a little thing like allegations of death threats, Internet porn and hookers ruin a Hollywood career?

Hollywood doesn't even blink over incest, rape, theft, drug use, robbery, assault, treason or combinations thereof.

IP: Logged

Mirandee
unregistered
posted April 25, 2006 11:36 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I am no fan of Charlie Sheen's either. These same allegations on Sheen have made the tabloids before, in fact years ago so his estranged wife is not the first to talk about his thing for prostitutes, drugs, violent behavior, gambling and the like. She was aware of these things even before she married him. The twit!!!

I don't know anything about Charlie Sheen's political views. It is his dad, Martin Sheen, that is very active politically and always has been - even before Bush gave him so much ammunititon. I agree with some things that Martin Sheen says but there are things I don't agree with.

I would not go so far as to label all actors and actresses or the "Hollywood crowd" as Jwhop calls them as all being the same. Some actors and actresses have been in long lasting marriages, Jim Garner for instance married his high school sweetheart and has been married only once. We could probably compile a list of those actors and actresses who have not exhibited bad behavior as well as those who have.

As far as I know, because I don't read gossip rags or watch those dumb shows on T.V. on hollywood stars - who gives a rats patooey? - Charlie Sheen's dad , Martin Sheen and his brother, Emilio Estevez have not been involved in any scandals.

I like his dad and his brother, never cared much for Charlie Sheen but he is a good actor as are his dad and brother. I think most of his decay into what he has become and all the trouble in his life is due to Charlie Sheen's drug addiction and his arrogance.

IP: Logged

lalalinda
Moderator

Posts: 1120
From: nevada
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 25, 2006 12:12 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for lalalinda     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Wasn't he a Heidi Fleiss Patron?

Jwhop and Piddy

IP: Logged

Mirandee
unregistered
posted April 25, 2006 12:26 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Who are you referring to, lalalinda? Charlie Sheen, Martin Sheen or Emilio Estevez?

As I stated, " as far as I know" because as I went on to explain I don't read those trash rags or watch those gossip shows. One of them may have been one of her clients for all I know. I feel though, that if it was Martin Sheen you are referring to that kind of stuff is more his wife's problem than mine. So why should I care?

IP: Logged

Rainbow~
unregistered
posted April 25, 2006 02:14 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Mirandee.....

Charlie Sheen "dared" to stand up and talk about the 9/11 cover up....made some noticable noise about it....

...and you and I both know that "those kind of guys" have to be put in their place so that their credibility gets screwed up...(that way, ain't nobody gonna buy all the '$hit' he's spewing)

Right?

Like I said....

Timing was perfect!

IP: Logged

pidaua
Knowflake

Posts: 67
From: Back in AZ with Bear the Leo
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 25, 2006 02:42 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for pidaua     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
'affidavit'

affidavit n : written declaration made under oath; a written statement sworn to be true before someone legally authorized to administer an oath


So... for those that think that this is tabloid crap, let's think of the legal ramifications of lying to someone in legal authority. It's called perjury.


IP: Logged

Planet_Soul
unregistered
posted April 25, 2006 03:15 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Charlie Sheen himself said he was a patron of Heidi Fleiss. I read those celeberity zines from time to time (: Very entertaining. I am in awe of Heidi Fleiss, becomming an entrepeneur at such a young age (:

IP: Logged

Rainbow~
unregistered
posted April 25, 2006 07:56 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
So... for those that think that this is tabloid crap, let's think of the legal ramifications of lying to someone in legal authority. It's called perjury.

Duh!

I for one did NOT say it was a bunch of tabloid crap!

What I was trying to get across (this is for
those who didn't get it) was....true or not....NOW is the time to expose his many sins, so that he can be taken down a peg or two, in the eyes of anyone who may have had some admiration for him for speaking out about the 9/11 coverup....and there are people with a lot of "clout" (and I don't mean Denise Richards) who are capable of seeing that it happens....

IP: Logged

TINK
unregistered
posted April 26, 2006 09:20 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Excellent point, rainbow.

Apart from that I can't believe we're still talking about this. I don't read celebrity tabloid crap. Does anyone actually care about Sheen's ugly little divorce?

IP: Logged

Mirandee
unregistered
posted April 26, 2006 11:47 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Rainbow, Good point that you are making and I for one do agree with it. Discrediting the character of anyone who disagrees and speaks out is a tactic of the Bush administration - has been from the beginning of his reign - and the pattern is of course "parroted" by his followers as are his mantras.

I did some checking a couple of days ago and now I know what this Charlie Sheen stuff is all about. I checked because I had to wonder why the lives of hollywood stars would be a concern of anyone. I mean, we should have more important things to worry about in our own lives than what some actor or actress is doing. At least we should beyond our teen years. He spoke out regarding the 9/11 Commission and called for an independent investigation into the events of 9/11 to address the unanswered questions that Bush's "Omission Commission" did not want to delve into. I do agree with Charlie Sheen on that issue and so do many other Americans.

If we are going to bring up Charlie Sheen's many sins to discredit him because he spoke out then why not bring up Bush's past and the things he has done in the way of drugs and alcohol? Why not discuss the behavior of his daughters and their wild times at college frat parties? Why not discuss Bush's two uncles? Because face it, the Bush family does not exactly have a high moral standard either in spite of the phoney act they put on.

I am not defending Charlie Sheen because as I said before I don't particularly like him but I will defend his right as an American to speak his mind without the fear of retaliation as it is his constitutional right to do so.

Retaliation for speaking out in disagreement with the Bush administration is standard procedure of Bush and those he appoints in his administration and it is a violation of the oath they all took to uphold the constitution. Retaliation for speaking one's mind has no place in a democracy. It has no place in a free society. Bush should have been impeached long ago for that alone among the many treasonous things he as done that are anti-constitutional.

Charlie Sheen, regardless of his character, has a constitutional right to speak his mind and do so without fear of retaliation. Those that want to attack his character or anyone else's for exercising their constitutional rights in America are showing their own contempt for the constitution which this country is based on. It amazes me that Bush supporters do this all the time while at the same time presenting themselves as the "true patriots" and waving the american flag as if that is what this country is based on instead of the constitution.

A wise man once said, " Let him who is without sin cast the first stone." And someone else said, " People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones." We all live in glass houses because there is no one who hasn't done something stupid in their lives.

IP: Logged

pidaua
Knowflake

Posts: 67
From: Back in AZ with Bear the Leo
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 26, 2006 01:50 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for pidaua     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
To each their own. Hey, if people want to believe this "alleged" pedophile is being targeted because he spoke out against Bush then so be it.

I am sure that Denise Richards and all abused, cheated on women, thank you for your support and willingness to defend her soon to be ex husband.

Maybe Bush and his people got together and put all this into Ms. Richard's mind while she was sleeping so that she can be used as a tool for the government? Not only that, they wanted to make the same point with those Lacrosse players which no doubt have been a bane to the Bush administration. Hey, let's throw in the other tops stories where people's sins are being exposed.... OH yeah, Ken Lay (that has to be great for the Bush peeps right now as well)

Bet that pill is easier for Bush haters to swallow than the truth that Bush had nothing to do with this idiot being an idiot.

Mirandee.... you are right. But, when it concerns illegal activities your damn right there is a judgment to be made. Funny, there was an allegation in another post about a child bride and everyone came out calling the person a sicko, stating he should be killed etc...

If this was say.... Oh I know, how about a conserative movie star like Clint Eastwood and his wife filed an affidavit / deposition (legal document) testifying to the fact that she caught him looking at underage porn / gay porn / visiting prostitutes - oh yeah... there would be people coming unglued on this message board "Hang the pervert.. what a loser" on and on..

And you know what, jwhop, myself and lotus (as well as others) would be right there saying the same thing because there is a line that has to be drawn when comitting certain acts of the criminal nature.

Yes, I will judge and not lose any sleep over someone that uses child porn to get his rocks off or decides to visit hookers, buy / sell narcotics...etc..

Not only is it my right, but it is against the law and the judicial system is behind my judgment.

Now, she is only making "allegations" which may be disproven, just as the allegation was disproven against Kobe Bryant for rape, against the first few counts of murder and subsequent release of Ted Bundy, or even the allegations against the Duke Lacrosse team.

So, if we take one into consideration and say "Oh yeah, that guy is horrible if this turns out to be true" why do we not apply it to all?

Playing favorites are we?

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2011

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a