Lindaland
  Global Unity
  So much..............

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   So much..............
Venusian Love
unregistered
posted July 13, 2006 09:22 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
murder...yuck

http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/hezbollah-threatens-haifa/2006/07/13/1152637794016.html

Hezbollah threatens Haifa

Smoke rises from Beirut international airport after it was hit by Israeli warplanes today.
Photo: Reuters

Latest related coverage
Australians feared stuck in Beirut
Eyewitness: Border becomes fire zone
Timeline: Israel's hostage crises
Your say: Are you stuck in Lebanon?
Video: Israeli air raids, push into Central Gaza

July 13, 2006 - 10:00PM
Page 1 of 3 | Single page
Hezbollah guerillas threatened today to attack the major Israeli port city of Haifa and its surroundings with rockets if Israel strikes the Lebanese capital Beirut and its southern suburbs.

Such a strike would be the deepest ever into Israel by Hezbollah guerillas, who fired volleys of rockets against towns of northern Israel during the past day.

It was not clear if Hezbollah rockets have the range to hit Haifa, located about 30 kilometres south of the border.

The Israeli army said several Hezbollah rockets overnight had landed more than 20 kilometres south of the border, showing that Hezbollah has managed to extend its missiles' range.

"The Islamic resistance warns against targeting civilians and the infrastructure," a statement read on Hezbollah TV said.

"It [resistance] specifically announces that it will quickly shell the city of Haifa and nearby areas if the southern suburbs and the city of Beirut are subjected to any direct Israeli aggression," the statement said.

Earlier today, the Israeli army warned Lebanon to evacuate all residents from a southern Beirut neighbourhood where it believes Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah lives, Israeli media reported.

"We have we passed on a warning to Lebanon to evacuate all civilians from the [southern] neighbourhood of Beirut, which is a Hezbollah stronghold and where Nasrallah lives, and where the organisation's headquarters and weapons stockpiles are," the Ma'ariv NRG news website quoted a senior army official as saying.

Israel Radio carried a similar report.

The army said it had no comment on whether Nasrallah was a target for assassination.

An Israeli helicopter gunship killed Nasrallah's predecessor, Sheik Abbas al-Mousawi, in 1992.

Rockets fired at northern Israeli town of Safed

Lebanese guerillas fired three rockets at the northern Israeli town of Safed today and seven people were injured, one seriously, witnesses and medics said.

The rockets hit an immigrants' absorption centre and a college. Another rocket fell near a gas station.

Safed had not been targeted by rockets since the 1990s.

Israel bombs Beirut airport

Israel today bombed Beirut's international airport and enforced a naval blockade of Lebanon, a day after Hezbollah captured two Israeli soldiers and killed eight.

Israel's heaviest air campaign against Lebanon in 24 years smashed the airport's runways and also targeted Hezbollah television.

The newly refurbished Rafik al-Hariri International Airport is named after the slain former prime minister.

A police officer said there were no casualties when missiles fired from fighter jets hit the runways before dawn, leaving large craters in the tarmac.

Lebanese anti-aircraft batteries frantically fired at the invading planes and the airport was shut, forcing flights to be diverted to the nearby Mediterranean island of Cyprus.

Lebanon said today the airport would remain shut for at least 48 hours.

"The airport will be partly operational within 48 hours, but reopening the airport is a political decision that will be decided by the cabinet," Transport Minister Mohamad Safadi told reporters.

"The runways have all been hit, although some less than others," he said.

"The closure of the airport has inflicted losses of $5 million only for today. This does not include damages, which will be determined later," an airport official said.

Dawn strikes kill dozens

The airport attack followed dawn air strikes on Hezbollah targets in Beirut's southern suburbs and across southern Lebanon, which killed 34 civilians, including eight young children, and wounded 52 people, security sources said.

Ten members of one family were killed in Dweir village and seven family members died in Baflay.

With Lebanon's sea and air links cut, Hezbollah retaliated against Israeli "massacres" by firing 60 Katyusha rockets at Nahariya in northern Israel.
One civilian was killed and at least 21 were wounded.

"In response to the massacres of civilians in the south and assaults on [Lebanese] infrastructure, the Islamic resistance bombarded ... the settlement of Nahariya in northern occupied Palestine with 60 rockets," said a statement by Hezbollah.

Israel's Magen David Adom ambulance service said a 40-year-old woman was killed when a rocket hit her house.

Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah said the two soldiers had been seized to force Israel to release Arab prisoners.

Israel insisted it would discuss no such swap and instead launched its military offensive.

In Canberra, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade said the Australian embassy in Beirut had been closed because of the worsening security situation.

In Jerusalem, Israeli Defence Minister Amir Peretz said Hezbollah would not be permitted to return to its previous positions along the Israeli border.

Israel has long demanded the Lebanese Government disarm Hezbollah, which is an avowed enemy of the Jewish state.

The violence was the worst between Israel and Lebanon since 1996 when Israeli troops still occupied part of the south.

It coincided with an major Israeli offensive into the Gaza Strip to retrieve a captured soldier and halt Palestinian rocket fire.

Despite the flare-up in Lebanon, Israel signalled no let-up in its Gaza assault, mounting an air strike that destroyed the office of Palestinian Foreign Minister Mahmoud al-Zahar.

The Israeli shekel lost as much as 2 per cent against the dollar in early trade. Pressure on the Lebanese pound increased.

Attack on Hezbollah TV station

Two hours after the airport raid, an Israeli helicopter fired a missile at the headquarters of Hezbollah's al-Manar TV in the Beirut suburb of Haret Hreik, wounding six people.

Israeli aircraft later attacked an al-Manar transmission tower south of Baalbek in eastern Lebanon, witnesses said.

Israel had promised a "very painful" response to Hezbollah's action of seizing two soldiers and killing eight.

The Israeli assault will increase domestic pressure on Hezbollah, which has refused to disarm in line with a 2004 UN resolution, and add to international calls on the Lebanese Government, led by an anti-Syrian coalition, to act.

"Either Hezbollah are stupid, or they don't care," said Michael Karam, editor of a Lebanese business magazine. "Now we've got no airport, so no tourism and no prosperity."

Hezbollah's cross-border attack yesterday, for which Israel holds the Beirut Government responsible, tore up tacit understandings that had limited border violence for six years since Israeli troops withdrew from south Lebanon.

"The Lebanese Government has now become a buffer squeezed between Israel and Hezbollah," said Amal Saad Ghorayeb, a Lebanese academic and author of a book on Hezbollah.

Lebanese Prime Minister Fouad Siniora has said his Government did not endorse the Hezbollah attack.

Apart from the Israeli attack on the Foreign Ministry building in Gaza, a separate air strike near Deir el-Balah in the central Gaza Strip killed an Islamic Jihad militant and wounded another gunman.

The White House condemned the Hezbollah attack and blamed Syria and Iran. Syria said Israeli actions were to blame for guerilla attacks.

Russia and France condemn strikes

France and Russia today condemned Israeli army strikes on Lebanon as "disproportionate".

"We obviously condemn this disproportionate act of war which also has two consequences," French Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy said on Europe 1 radio.

"The first is to force anyone wanting to now enter Lebanon to go either by sea or by Syria," he said.

"The second consequence is to run the risk of plunging Lebanon back into the worst years of war with the departure of Lebanese who will want to flee while they were in the process of rebuilding their country."

In Moscow, Russia also slammed Israel's "disproportionate use of force" against Lebanon and Palestinian territory, saying that civilians were being made to suffer.

"One cannot justify the continued destruction by Israel of the civilian infrastructure in Lebanon and in Palestinian territory, involving the disproportionate use of force in which the civilian population suffers," the Foreign Ministry said in a statement that also condemned terrorism.

The ministry described the situation as "extremely worrying" and Israel's bombing of Beirut's international airport as "a dangerous step on the road to military escalation."

"We firmly reaffirm support for Lebanon's sovereignty and territorial integrity," the statement said.

Moscow also condemned the abduction of Israeli soldiers by Palestinian militants and Hezbollah.

"All forms of terrorism are completely unacceptable," the statement said, calling for the "immediate and unconditional release" of the soldiers.

"All sides involved in the current events should take rapid measures to stop the region sliding into open conflict."

Agencies


__._,_.___
Messages in this topic (1) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic
Messages | Files | Photos | Links | Database | Polls | Members | Calendar

You are receiving Individual Emails Change Delivery Settings
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe New Message Search
Find the message you want faster. Visit your group to try out the improved message search.

Share feedback on the new changes to Groups

Recent Activity
10New Members
1New Files
Visit Your Group .

__,_._,___

IP: Logged

DayDreamer
unregistered
posted July 13, 2006 12:50 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
"We have we passed on a warning to Lebanon to evacuate all civilians from the [southern] neighbourhood of Beirut, which is a Hezbollah stronghold and where Nasrallah lives, and where the organisation's headquarters and weapons stockpiles are," the Ma'ariv NRG news website quoted a senior army official as saying.

That's why they hit:

quote:
The rockets hit an immigrants' absorption centre and a college. Another rocket fell near a gas station.

quote:
Israel bombs Beirut airport

Israel today bombed Beirut's international airport and enforced a naval blockade of Lebanon, a day after Hezbollah captured two Israeli soldiers and killed eight.


Now here comes Lebanon (for those Americans who dont value the life of a Muslim, maybe you'll care that 40% of this country's population is Christian).

quote:
Lebanese anti-aircraft batteries frantically fired at the invading planes and the airport was shut, forcing flights to be diverted to the nearby Mediterranean island of Cyprus

The costs of the closure of the airport alone...

quote:
"The closure of the airport has inflicted losses of $5 million only for today. This does not include damages, which will be determined later," an airport official said.

More Israel attacks...

quote:
Dawn strikes kill dozens

The airport attack followed dawn air strikes on Hezbollah targets in Beirut's southern suburbs and across southern Lebanon, which killed 34 civilians, including eight young children, and wounded 52 people, security sources said.


The life of this one Hezbollah leader is worth more than that of 34 innocent civilians. (And they didnt even get him).

The war is spreading...

IP: Logged

DayDreamer
unregistered
posted July 13, 2006 01:01 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Actually scratch that 34 civilians killed.

Right now the count is more than 50!

quote:
BEIRUT, Lebanon - Israel intensified its attacks against Lebanon on Thursday, blasting Beirut's airport and two Lebanese army air bases near the Syrian border, and imposing a naval blockade. More than 50 people have died

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060713/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_lebanon_30;_ylt=ArDnwiJLEN_tN5DF2bKf378UvioA;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl

Oh boo hoo, all you Muslims complain about is how you get bombed and killed...cry me a river.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted July 13, 2006 01:13 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yes, acts of war against a nation capable of defending itself does have consequences. Lebanon has been warned many times to restrain and disarm Hizbollah...which has launched attacks against Israel repeatedly.

Electing a terrorist government bent on the destruction of Israel has consequences too...when that government commits acts of war against it's neighbor as Hamas has done repeatedly.

Supporting, funding, training and sheltering terrorists and sending them out to fight a proxy war against Israel may well have very serious consequences for Syria and Iran as well.

The time for making excuses for terrorists, terrorism and terrorist supporting nations is over. When people vote for a terrorist government in the full knowledge of what they are and what they stand for...then they must bear the responsibility for the actions of their government.

IP: Logged

DayDreamer
unregistered
posted July 13, 2006 01:27 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Here's how I see it...

You use the term terrorist to label every Muslim or country that has a Muslim majority that will fight back...whether the fighting is offensive (uncalled for...rightly so, but usually it's in retaliation), or in defense.

Yet you refuse to see any acts of violence by the US or Israel as even partially related to terrorist acts.

You should stop now or change your strategy...because you are seething with hypocricy.

IP: Logged

lioneye68
unregistered
posted July 13, 2006 03:09 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

From what I can gather so far...

Israel has a long history of being on the defensive side of Arab attacks, from all directions. The tiny little nation has managed to survive them all thus far, because they believe with conviction in an ordained right to exist there - Arabs do not believe so, though. They've been trying to chase them out of Israel since it was 'granted' to them, as a national homeland by the Brits in 1916. But, the Jews have no place to run. They are extremely outnumbered and despised through the Arab majority of M.E. They have no choice but hold their ground, whatever it takes.


IP: Logged

lioneye68
unregistered
posted July 13, 2006 03:12 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
The Middle East war is not now and never was a conflict between Israelis/Jews on the one hand and Palestinians on the other. In fact, the Arab-"Palestinians", while currently the perpetrators of most of the anti-Jewish atrocities, were never a very important part of the conflict. In fact, before about 1970, virtually no one in the world considered the Middle East conflict to be one between Israelis and Palestinians.
The term "Palestinian" itself had referred to Israeli Jews back in the 1940s, and had been slowly deconstructed and redefined to refer to the Arabs in the West Bank and Gaza. The Middle East Conflict was always a war by Arabs against Jews, not a conflict between Israelis and "Palestinians." The war was repackaged as a conflict between Jews and Palestinians as a public relations gimmick by the Arab fascist regimes. These regimes had never had any interest in "Palestinians," in creating a "Palestinian" state, or in "Palestinian nationalism" before 1967. That is because Palestinian nationalism did not and DOES NOT exist. The Palestinians were a regional group of Arabs having virtually no cultural nor national distinctive traits separating them from Syrians, Lebanese, and Jordanians. They are all basically Arabs!.

The bulk of what are called "Palestinian Arabs" are members of families who migrated into the Land of Israel beginning in the late 19th century. Palestinian nationalism is a mislabeling of Arab nationalism. Arab nationalism exists, although it is closely bound up with Islamic nationalism and even Islamism. Palestinian nationalism, however, is a phantom. It is nothing more than genocidal hatred of Jews!

The Arab assaults and aggressions against Israel in 1948, 1956, 1967, 1968, and 1973 had nothing to do with Palestinians. The Palestinian terror campaign would itself be easy to suppress today and eradicate if the Middle East conflict were really a Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Israel would simply obliterate the terrorists and expel their supporters to Syria and Lebanon. The Middle East war continues because it is really an Arab-Israeli war, not an Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It is also in large part a war between barbarism and civilization. In many ways an Islamic religious jihad against the Jews.



http://www.masada2000.org/historical.html

IP: Logged

DayDreamer
unregistered
posted July 13, 2006 03:41 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
lioneye,

always make sure you check your sources.
http://www.masada2000.org/index.html

They want to drive the Palestinians out of Israel/Palestine...from day 1...before WWII.

http://www.mideastweb.org/briefhistory.htm
The first site you get when you google in Israel-Palestine...seems a little less biased to me.

Thank You! * Toda * Shukran

IP: Logged

lioneye68
unregistered
posted July 13, 2006 04:03 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yes, thank you - I found that site as well (http://www.mideastweb.org/briefhistory.htm)
and I printed it to read later. I realized that the one I did read was from an Israeli viewpoint, but I haven't had time to read the other yet. Seems to me, every veiwpoint is slanted one way or the other.

I did read something from a seemingly unbaised source about a year ago, and it said many of the same things that the masada site is saying. But, it didn't conveniently omit Israels wrong doings either.

IP: Logged

DayDreamer
unregistered
posted July 13, 2006 04:15 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Whenever there are opinions involved then biases may be present too.

But the masada website you sourced, which looks like a Zionist site, is by far much more biased.

Here are some things from the site that are obvious red flags...

quote:
Self-Hating Jews
"Jews for a 2nd Holocaust"
(Featuring Michael Lerner)

quote:
ISLAM: A Religion of Peace?
Or is it preparing to
sodomize the world!
HINT:
Islam Cannot be Tamed

quote:
Islam, the "Religion of Peace?" NOT!

quote:
When Muslims call out for "tolerance,"
what they really mean is that others
should tolerate their B.S.!

quote:
Condoleezza Rice
and U.S. State Department
Promote International Terrorism!
(Not sure I disagree with that?)

quote:
MUST SEE TO BE BELIEVED!
Is Islam a Religion or is it a Mental Illness?

IP: Logged

lioneye68
unregistered
posted July 13, 2006 05:46 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Islam, the "Religion of Peace?" NOT!
...is the tag place placed over links to 2 video taped beheadings. In this case, I would agree, that's doesn't exactly support the claim of being a religion of peace.

I realize that these are extemists, and the typical Muslem deplores these things (I hope)...Just putting it all in context.

IP: Logged

DayDreamer
unregistered
posted July 13, 2006 07:51 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Oooh Im so tempted to argue right now...

But I'll be good and let you in on a little secret instead, that is if you havent already figured it out:

These beheadings (which I did not watch) have no part in Islam. So this can in no why justify what kind of religion Islam is, since those participating in the beheading are not following the religion.

IP: Logged

DayDreamer
unregistered
posted July 13, 2006 09:11 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
U.S. vetoes U.N. condemnation of Israel

By NICK WADHAMS, Associated Press Writer
2 hours, 49 minutes ago


The United States blocked an Arab-backed resolution Thursday that would have demanded Israel halt its military offensive in the Gaza Strip, the first U.N. Security Council veto in nearly two years.

The draft, sponsored by Qatar on behalf of other Arab nations, accused Israel of a "disproportionate use of force" that endangered Palestinian civilians, and demanded Israel withdraw its troops from Gaza.

The United States was alone in voting against the resolution. Ten of the 15 Security Council nations voted in favor, while Britain, Denmark, Peru and Slovakia abstained.

The U.S. has periodically used its veto to block resolutions critical of Israel. The last council veto, in October 2004, was cast when the United States blocked a resolution condemning another Israeli operation in Gaza.

The draft was reworked repeatedly to address concerns that it was too biased against Israel. Language was added calling for the release of an abducted soldier and urging the Palestinians to stop firing rockets at Israel.

Nonetheless, U.S. Ambassador John Bolton said it was still unacceptable because it had been overtaken by events in the region — including the capture of two Israeli soldiers by Hezbollah militants on Wednesday — and was "unbalanced."

"It placed demands on one side in the Middle East conflict but not the other," Bolton said. "This draft resolution would have exacerbated tensions in the region."

Israel launched the operation two weeks ago in response to the June 25 capture of an Israeli soldier, 19-year-old Cpl. Gilad Shalit.

The resolution called on Israel and the Palestinians to "take immediate steps to create the necessary condition for the resumption of negotiation and restarting the peace process." It urged all parties to help alleviate the "dire humanitarian situation" faced by Palestinians.

The United States sought a text that said the Israeli actions were in direct response to rocket attacks against Israel and Shalit's capture.

Bolton said the United States remains "gravely concerned" at the escalation of the conflict and believes the best way to calm the situation is for Hamas to release Shalit.

The draft also demanded Israel release the Palestinian officials it has arrested.

The Palestinian observer to the U.N., Riyad Mansour, said he was disappointed with the council's "continued inability to act while innocent Palestinian civilians continue to be brutally killed by the Israeli occupying forces."

Referring to past U.S. practice of vetoing similar resolutions, Mansour said the council is failing the Palestinians. In Gaza, the Palestinian Foreign Ministry spokesman, Taher al-Nunu, said the United States must bear some responsibility for Israel's attacks.

"The veto is a political cover for the crimes of the occupation, and regrettably, instead of putting war criminals of this government that lost its mind on trial, they are giving a political cover to carry out more of these crimes," al-Nunu said.

In a speech to the council immediately following Mansour, Israel's U.N. Ambassador Dan Gillerman thanked the U.S. for its "bold stand." He defended Israel's actions and put the blame for attacks against Israel squarely on Iran and Syria.

"What we are seeing are the actions of Hamas and Hezbollah, but they are merely the fingers of the bloodstained hands and the executioners of the twisted minds of the leaders of the world's most ominous axis of terror, Syria and Iran," he said.

Eight of the last nine vetoes in the council have been cast by the United States. Of those, seven concerned the Israel-Palestinian conflict.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060713/ap_on_re_mi_ea/un_israel_gaza

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2011

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a