Lindaland
  Global Unity
  MSNBC.COM - A look back at some of the biggest falsehoods of 2006

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   MSNBC.COM - A look back at some of the biggest falsehoods of 2006
Sweet Stars
unregistered
posted December 30, 2006 04:57 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Lies and Obfuscations
A look back at some of the biggest falsehoods of 2006.
NEW FEATURE

Get alerted to the latest from Newsweek's columnists through your MSN or Windows Messenger, your e-mail or your mobile device.
advertisement

Click Here Click Here

SEARCH THE SITE


ELEANOR CLIFT

More
• Bush's Worst Lies of 2006
A look back at some of the biggest falsehoods of 2006.
• Dems and the Johnson Crisis

Subscribe to feed for this columnist

Advertisement

Madam President: Shattering the Last Glass Ceiling
by Eleanor Clift
Web-Exclusive Commentary
By Eleanor Clift
Newsweek
Updated: 2:29 p.m. ET Dec 26, 2006

Dec. 22, 2006 - In the spirit of holding our political leaders accountable, this year-end review will tabulate the worst lies told by Bush and company, along with several stories that were underreported in the media. Much of what was generated got lost in the fog of war, but the long arm of history will retrieve these moments. As the president said in his news conference this week, if they’re still writing about No. 1—George Washington—there’s plenty of time before the historians can properly evaluate No. 43. Judging by the mess in Iraq, it could be 200 or 300 years—if ever—before Bush is vindicated.
Story continues below ↓ advertisement

Bush has shifted his rhetoric in deference to the grim and deteriorating reality on the ground in Iraq. Asked by a reporter on Oct. 25 if we are winning the war, Bush said, “Absolutely, we’re winning.” Offered the opportunity at his press conference to defend that statement, Bush has adopted a new formulation. He now says, “We’re not winning, but we’re not losing.” That sounds like the definition of a quagmire.

Exploitation of the war gained Republicans seats in ’02 and got Bush a second term in ’04, but it wasn’t enough in ’06. Karl Rove decided the best way for Republicans to retain control of the House and Senate was to embrace the war in Iraq and run against the Democrats as “Defeatocrats” and “Cut and Runners.” It might have worked, had not most Americans decided they did indeed want to cut and run. Not right away—the voters want an orderly exit—but they weren’t buying Bush’s big lie about the Democrats.

Bush campaigned this fall as though the Democrats were the real enemy, not the terrorists. “They [Democrats] think the best way to protect the American people is wait until we’re attacked again … If you don’t want your government listening in on terrorists, vote for the Democrats.” Now that the Democrats have won, watch Bush try to off-load blame for the failure in Iraq. If the Democrats won’t go along with whatever cockamamie scheme he comes up with, he can always accuse them of losing the war.

CONTINUED http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16326716/site/newsweek/


IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2011

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a