Lindaland
  Global Unity
  Bush Dealt First Veto Override by Congress

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Bush Dealt First Veto Override by Congress
Mirandee
unregistered
posted November 08, 2007 03:03 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
This is a good thing but my question is, wasn't medical insurance for children important enough for Congress to override that veto by Bush?

Bush Dealt First Veto Override

POSTED: 12:31 pm EST November 8, 2007
UPDATED: 1:02 pm EST November 8, 2007
http://www.clickondetroit.com/politics/1454149 1/detail.html?treets=det&tml=det_natlbreak&ts=T&tmi=det_natlbreak_1_11370211082007


Congress has handed President George W. Bush his first override.

The vote came as the Senate enacted a $23 billion water resources bill despite the president's protest that it was too expensive.

Besides the defeat for Bush, it marked the first time in a decade that Congress has passed a bill over a presidential veto.

The vote was 79-14 to pass the bill.

Republicans joined Democrats on Tuesday in voting in favor of the same bill. The vote was 361-54.

The bill funds hundreds of Army Corps of Engineers projects, such as dams, sewage plants and beach restoration, that are popular in home districts.

The bill also includes money for the hurricane-hit Gulf Coast and for Florida Everglades restoration efforts.

The bill is the first water system restoration and flood control authorization passed by Congress since 2000. It would cost $11.2 billion over the next four years, and $12 billion in the 10 years after that, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Distributed by Internet Broadcasting Systems, Inc. The Associated Press contributed to this report. All rights reserved.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 08, 2007 03:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
This is a good thing but my question is, wasn't medical insurance for children important enough for Congress to override that veto by Bush?Mirandee

Because the bill insured children who were up to 25 years old. Because it insured children of families making more than $83,000 a year and...Because it would have taken children who are now covered by private insurance from their parents employers out of private coverage and put them on the rolls of government paid insurance.

This bill was a miserable piece of leftist bullshiiit which did not focus on children of the truly poor...who are already covered by government insurance or eligible for the program already but rather sought to backdoor a socialist health care system piecemeal.

It deserved to fail and Bush vetoed it. Good for Bush.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2011

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a