Lindaland
  Global Unity
  The Congressional Seat Protection Act of 2008

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   The Congressional Seat Protection Act of 2008
jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted February 02, 2008 02:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
That's what it should be called you know.

This demoscat Congress has accomplished almost nothing and has the lowest job approval rating ever recorded.

So, it seems entirely natural...to them...to offer some goodies from the public treasury...to voters...to help get themselves re-elected.

The fact none of what they propose is going to stimulate the economy is beside the point.

There is a lag time for any reverse move in an economy of 14 trillion dollars.

With Hillary threating to "take the profits" of oil companies and "take things away from you...in the public interest, businesses are much more likely to pull in their horns, lay people off, not expand operations, market new products or do any of the things they did when Bush lowered corporation taxes and capital gains taxes.

Wrong prescription.

Right prescription would be to make the Bush tax cuts permenant across the board but leftists never saw a tax increase they didn't like.

Recession Alarm
By Walter Williams
The Washington Times | Friday, February 01, 2008

Some Democratic and Republican presidential hopefuls are preaching economic doom and gloom, disappearing middle class, and failing health care industry.

What's their solution? The short answer is give them more control over our lives. Baltimore's political satirist, the late H.L. Mencken, explained this strategy, saying, "The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed, and hence clamorous to be led to safety, by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."

The imaginary hobgoblin this time is the threat of a recession, though it is by no means clear the U.S. economy is in a recession. To head off a recession, politicians, including President Bush, call for a stimulus package.

Before we talk about stimulus packages, let's get one question out of the way: Is there any evidence for the existence of a Santa Claus or Tooth Fairy? Most grown-ups would probably answer no and ask, "Williams, this is a serious issue. Why are you talking about silly things like Santas and Tooth Fairies?" The reason is quite simple. Let's look at it.

The White House proposal is to give individuals and households tax rebates ranging from $800 to $1,600 respectively. Congressional Democrats, in addition to tax rebates, want a stimulus package that targets the poor through increases in food stamps and greater unemployment benefits. The details of different stimulus packages aren't as important as where the money comes from. You can bet the rent money it won't come from Santa or the Tooth Fairy.

There are three ways government can get the money for a stimulus package. It can tax, borrow or inflate the currency by printing money. If government taxes to hand out money, one person is stimulated at the expense of another who pays the tax, who is unstimulated and has less money to spend. If government borrows the money, it's the same story. This time the unstimulated person is the lender who has less money to spend.

If government prints money, creditors, and then everyone else, are unstimulated. As my George Mason University colleague Russell Roberts said in a NPR broadcast: "It's like taking a bucket of water from the deep end of a pool and dumping it into the shallow end. Funny thing — the water in the shallow end doesn't get any deeper."

If we are headed into a recession, these proposed stimulus packages will make little difference. Previous experiences have shown (1) it takes a long time to enact tax law, making it too late to prevent a recession, and (2) many people save a large portion of any tax rebate.

A far more important measure that Congress can take toward a healthy economy is to ensure that the 2003 tax cuts don't expire in 2010 as scheduled. If not, there are 15 separate taxes scheduled to rise in 2010, costing Americans $200 billion a year in increased taxes.

Adding to the economic effects of that tax increase are the disincentive effects of decisions by Americans between now and then in anticipation of the increases. Economists Tracy Foertsch and Ralph Rector say making the 2003 tax cuts permanent will annually add $76 billion to the gross domestic product, create 709,000 jobs and add $200 billion to personal income.

The call for stimulus packages represents the triumph of political arrogance over common sense. The United States is a massive $14 trillion economy. The size of proposed stimulus packages range from $150 billion to $200 billion, which is about 1 to 2 percent of our GDP. Economywide, that's a drop in the bucket likely to have little or no effect.

Congress ought to focus on measures that create greater long-term productive incentives such as reducing corporate taxes, estate taxes and personal income taxes as well as economic deregulation.

E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University, Fairfax, Va., and a syndicated columnist.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2011

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a