posted May 12, 2008 04:40 PM            

http://youtube.com/watch?v=EYI7JXGqd0o

+++FORWARD THIS VIDEO TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW - NOW!!!+++
This, my friends, is the ultimate clip regarding WMD lies - the clip we have all been waiting for. All the lies of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell compiled together, brilliantly done, with some great "extra" material.

posted May 12, 2008 04:54 PM            

This documentary serves as expert testimony as to the reasons Americans should question the official story that we were told about the 9/11 tragedy. (www.archiveoflight.com)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuxOZJN4dHg

EVIDENCE OF THERMITE AT THE SOUTH TOWER

BYU physicist Professor Steven Jones told peers at a Utah meeting that, "while almost no fire, even one ignited by jet fuel, can cause structural steel to fail, the combination of thermite and sulfur "slices through steel like a hot knife through butter."

Jones points to this video which shows a bright yellow molten substance dripping from the south tower minutes before its collapse. Government investigators claimed that this was aluminum from Flight 175 but Jones is adamant that aluminum is silvery in appearance and doesn't turn yellow.

Jones also told the media that sulfur traces found at ground zero indicates the thermite was combined with sulphur to make it burn even hotter than the normal 2500 degrees Celsius.

Jones stated that thermite was a "clever" choice because its ingredients, aluminum and iron oxide do not require identifying tags by law, meaning they couldn't be traced back to their manufacturers.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lv2ck2qsiGA&feature=related

posted May 12, 2008 05:00 PM            

Now, where's the direct Bush quotes..including the day, place and event in which he lied to lead America into war..along with a credible source..like a major newspaper or broadcast news show?

posted May 12, 2008 05:02 PM            

BBC Conspiracy files 9/11 - complete conclusion, with information once kept from the public. Lies about Al Queda. Alleged 9/11 paymaster Omar Saeed Sheikh confessed to being funded and supported by Pakistan and the ISI. American agents were threatened with prosecution if they didnt hush this up.

posted May 12, 2008 05:15 PM            

Its time you shut up.

There it is, right before your eyes.

Bush says one thing in one clip, and the opposite in the next.

If that is not proof, then what is?

posted May 12, 2008 06:23 PM            

Now, where's the documentation where Bush told the lie or lies which led America into war. Date, location, event..and the lie..as recorded by a credible news source...and the news site on the Internet where those quotes can be seen..attributed to Bush by a credible news person?

posted May 12, 2008 07:34 PM            

Its not about attributing anything, jfluff. He is right there saying it.

I dont care if it was filmed on a camcorder or a cell phone, fer Chrissake.

Open your eyes already.

"There are none so blind as those who will not see."

posted May 12, 2008 07:42 PM            

~M

posted May 12, 2008 08:16 PM            

You have to be pretty dim to not understand the difference between a lie...a deliberate misstatement of fact intended to deceive and a mistake of fact.

Now tell me again about that lie.

George Tenet, Director Central Intelligence comes into a meeting with Bush...He slams his hand down on the table and says..."it's a slam dunk Mr President, Saddam has weapons of mass destruction.

So, tell me about that lie Bush told again. You know, the lie Bush told to lead America to war.

While you're at it, you can call the heads of every western nation and the heads of their intelligence agencies liars too because they all thought Saddam had WMD.

Saddam's generals thought there were WMD which would be available for their use if the US invaded Iraq.

You're just pis$ing into the wind with this nonsense.

While we're on the subject of pis$ing into the wind. Imagine this...all you 9/11 conspiracy nuts.

The guy..Bush, who was clever enough to plan the attack on the WTC, somehow slipping demolition teams into the WTC while the buildings were occupied over long periods of time...because it takes a very long time, weeks and sometimes a month or more to lay and wire enough explosives to bring down a building of that size...never mind..somehow Bush managed it all...but, Bush the mastermind wasn't clever enough to plant some WMD in Iraq to be found by teams roaming all over the countryside.

Psssst, hey Mack, why don't you take a squad out Baghdad Road. About 12 miles out you'll start seeing the signs.."This way to Saddam's WMD". Can't miss it.

posted May 12, 2008 08:47 PM            

I'll get over it.
Have a good one.

posted May 12, 2008 08:58 PM            

6. to express what is false; convey a false impression.

quote:

---

George Tenet, Director Central Intelligence comes into a meeting with Bush...He slams his hand down on the table and says..."it's a slam dunk Mr President, Saddam has weapons of mass destruction.

---

Another lie.

quote:

---

The guy..Bush, who was clever enough to plan the attack on the WTC, somehow slipping demolition teams into the WTC while the buildings were occupied over long periods of time...because it takes a very long time, weeks and sometimes a month or more to lay and wire enough explosives to bring down a building of that size...never mind..somehow Bush managed it all...but, Bush the mastermind wasn't clever enough to plant some WMD in Iraq to be found by teams roaming all over the countryside.

---

Strangely, Jwhop's reminding me of Bill Maher!

posted May 13, 2008 12:13 AM            

As for George...as you call him seeing the first plane strike the WTC before he went into the classroom; that's the way I understood it. I don't believe he made a mistake. At that time no one knew the WTC or America was actually under a terrorist attack. The air traffic control had notified NORAD that a plane had been hijacked and perhaps by the time the second plane had struck, it was pretty clear it wasn't just about hijacking.

As for Bush, he got the word of the second plane while he was in the classroom and didn't see that on television. I don't see any inconsistencies there at all.

Some twits attempted to make an issue of Bush continuing reading to the class...after he knew but then, they don't know what was happening in the background.

First thing is that Bush is under the protection of the Secret Service. They call the shots when there's a credible threat to the President or even a possible threat.

While Bush was reading, plans, including flight plans for Air Force One were being changed which probably meant refueling for a flight of undetermined length. So Bush could have jumped up, rushed off to the air strip but the plane probably wasn't ready and neither had the Secret Service had time to arrange an alternative route back to the plane. With the President under a possible threat, they wouldn't have normally taken the same route back...too much predictability. Bush was safer where he was with protection all around the building and on the grounds of the school...until all the plans were made and the plane was ready to fly.

There's just too much for the conspiracy nuts to overcome. There's the various sciences and scientists who have looked at the video and done the calculations after studying the building plans, structural loading and all the rest. That should be enough but not if the nuts want to continue their jihad against Bush.

If there were explosives used the residue would have been all over the building debris. Simple science to check, nothing new there since every explosive leaves it's own trace residue. Further, building debris was on the site for at least a month and probably a lot longer.

But here's something I haven't said anything about before, so let's get your unbiased opinion about what it might mean.

WTC1 was struck between the 94th and 98th floors. There were 110 stories in the building.

Now, think about what would have to be true if demolition charges were set in the building in advance.

You and just about everyone else on earth has seen the video of the building coming down as the floors collapsed one after another all the way to the bottom starting with the impact floor(s) and windows blowing out of the building.

What you didn't see and no one else saw either were windows being blown out on floors higher than the impact point of the airplane(s) as the floors below collapsed.

But, how did the hijackers know What floor of the WTC to fly the plane into? You see the problem? It wouldn't do at all to set explosives on floors ABOVE the planned impact floor. Imagine all those windows blowing out on floors 99-110...above the point were floor joists began to fail. That couldn't be explained by all the science in the world. I mean the floor joists fail on floor...say 94 triggering a sequential event of failing floor joists and collapse...but, the windows on floors ABOVE are being blown out of the building on floors 99-110. Definitely, there would be something fishy there...but it didn't happen that way.

Those planes were doing about 450 knots and I don't think anyone is going to believe the pilot was counting floors to make sure he hit the right one.

What would have happened if he had struck..say floor 49 and when the building started collapsing windows on floors 50-110 suddenly blew out one floor after the other?

posted May 13, 2008 12:26 AM            

Another lie....acoustic"

A LIE acoustic? Are you sure acoustic that Tenet didn't tell Bush, "it's a slam dunk, Saddam has WMD? Huh, Duh, that's exactly what Bob Woodward wrote in his book...after interviewing Bush, Tenet and every other administration official he wanted to interview.

I'm beginning to wonder if English is your first language acoustic. You seem so....linguistically challenged.

How is it you don't know that for a statement to be a LIE, the speaker must know it's a LIE when he says it and the speakers intent must be to deceive whom ever is hearing it.

I'm trying to determine something you're actually good at acoustic. It's sure not language..at least not English. It's sure not analysis or reading with comprehension

posted May 13, 2008 12:41 AM            

George Tenet got slam-dunked yesterday.

Officially, the CIA director resigned for personal reasons. CIA officials say he wasn't pushed. President Bush says he's sorry to see Tenet go. "He's done a superb job on behalf of the American people," Bush said. Tenet's seven-year tenure was eventful and embattled.

Yet his legacy may distill into a taunting shorthand: slam-dunk.

As in, it was a "slam-dunk" that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction. Or so Tenet said, with the kind of unambiguous self-assurance that Bush so admires. These will go down as Tenet's famous last words, even though he uttered them more than a year ago.

"George, how confident are you?" the president asked Tenet, in an exchange depicted in Bob Woodward's book "Plan of Attack."

posted May 13, 2008 10:32 PM            

About the George thing... I guess I didn't understand how he saw the first plane hit on tv, since they wouldn't have had cameras on the World Trade Center before the first plane hit, so I wondered what he was talking about.
That did seem a little weird to me. Am I misunderstanding that?
I don't think it was wrong for him to sit in the classroom. He is a Cancer and he did seem stunned and worried. I think it was good that he was thinking. What you said about the secret service creating an alternate route makes some sense to me as well.

posted May 13, 2008 10:57 PM            

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8XToX7aSdg

posted May 13, 2008 11:11 PM            

Bombs, explosions, secondary explosions, explosive devices....how many more times do we need to hear these words being said by 9/11 witnesses before we start asking questions about what really happened on that awful day?

This video shows that many actual 9/11 witnesses heard and saw explosions going off inside the towers, long before they actually fell. These witnesses include police, firemen and mainstream media reporters.

And what is even more shocking is the fact that all of this has been ignored by the mainstream media.