Lindaland
  Global Unity
  Historians and Year 2008

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Historians and Year 2008
jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 31, 2008 06:05 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Historians may one day look back from the perspective of our future and decide 2008 was the year journalism died in America. Political cheerleading and open activism has replaced journalism at the networks and newspapers.

Never, ever has the bulk of the press been so openly cheerleading for a political candidate as they are for the Marxist Barack Hussein Obama. No tough questions about his past, his past and present associations or questions about his experience or in depth questions about tax, economic or social policy.

Any negative story which pops up about Obama doesn't come from the main stream media. They only get around to printing or broadcasting the story when the stench is too strong to ignore.

So, it's not surprising to see the network of lunatics, MSNBC running a banner making fun of McCain/Palin...and this, during the daytime; not when the head lunatics Olbermann and Matthews are on the air with their lunacy.

MSNBC 'smears' Palin from very 1st moment
O'Reilly: 'One of the most outrageous things I've ever seen in my 35 years in journalism'

Posted: August 31, 2008
5:05 pm Eastern
By Joe Kovacs

From the very first moment that John McCain's selection of Sarah Palin for his Republican running mate was announced, the MSNBC news network was engaged in a deliberate attempt to smear the Alaska governor, according to Fox News host Bill O'Reilly.

During Friday night's edition of "The O'Reilly Factor," the Fox anchor displayed MSNBC's "breaking news" graphic, which ran the message, "How many houses does Palin add to the Republican ticket?"


MSNBC's breaking news banner of John McCain's announcement of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate featured a message asking, "How many houses does Palin add tot he Republican ticket?" (courtesy "The O'Reilly Factor")

The comment was a reference to John McCain's recnt difficulty answering how many houses he owned.

"This is under a breaking news headline," said O'Reilly. "It's not commentary. It's not their left-wing loons at night. It's not that. It's NBC News' version of hard news coverage of the presidential campaign. ... I am just sick almost sick that this is going on."

O'Reilly called the message "snide" and said it was "one of the most outrageous things that I've ever seen in my 35 years in journalism."

O'Reilly was interviewing radio talk-show host Laura Ingraham, who spent "a lot of years" working at MSNBC.

"Let me say that it's sad and it's disappointing, but right now, is it really surprising?" Ingraham said. "What's clear is that this is a left-wing network with a left-wing agenda. It's completely dishonest."

"I think women across the country should be insulted and look at what's going on at MSNBC very carefully because we're gonna see a lot more of this in the coming weeks and months, and that is a sad commentary," she added.

Ingraham said she felt sorry for NBC broadcast anchors Brian Williams and Tom Brokaw due to the MSNBC's pro-Barack Obama bias, but O'Reilly said both were part of the problem.

"I think if Williams and Brokaw had any courage at all, which they don't," O'Reilly said, "they'd go into [General Electric CEO Jeff] Immelt and they would say, 'You gotta stop this. You gotta stop it. You're ruining our reputation.' But those people, Brokaw and Williams, they're in it for the money, Laura. They don't care about the country. They don't care about the corruption. They care about themselves."

O'Reilly isn't the only media person ripping MSNBC.

HBO's Bill Maher, himself well-known for his left-leaning stances, commented on MSNBC's coverage following Obama's Thursday night speech after he accepted the Democratic nomination.

"The coverage after, that I was watching, from MSNBC, I mean these guys were ready to have sex with him," Maher said.

As WND previously reported, a comprehensive analysis of every evening news report by the NBC, ABC and CBS television networks on Barack Obama since he came to national prominence concludes coverage of the Illinois senator has "bordered on giddy celebration of a political 'rock star' rather than objective newsgathering."

Embedded video http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=73968


IP: Logged

Mannu
Knowflake

Posts: 45
From: always here and no where
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 31, 2008 06:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mannu     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I noticed Anderson's reactions.
It was fear written all over his face.
May be he is gay and supports Obama and he feels threatened by Palin for the first time.

IP: Logged

writesomething
unregistered
posted September 01, 2008 09:38 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
are you kidding me? MSNBC is so left wing. Please, and what do you call Faux News? BALANCED? WTF? It scares me when I realize theres people out there thinking this twisted. Msnbc doesnt = all news networks. At least on other networks, you have far more differing views than faux. I cant even watch faux for 5 mins without them trying to get across a right wing agenda. Faux is smear, and if anyone is gonna go down in history for killing journalism it's faux news.

quote:
O'Reilly: 'One of the most outrageous things I've ever seen in my 35 years in journalism'

when I read, this, i just thought "really....bill? really? come on"...yeah okay, hes worked for faux for how long now? i have a hard time believing this statement.

IP: Logged

BlueRoamer
Knowflake

Posts: 95
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 01, 2008 10:48 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for BlueRoamer     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Fox news reminds me of the 2 minutes of hate depicted in 1984...it's not news, it's propoganda.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 03, 2008 10:23 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
No, I'm not kidding you. MSNBC has dropped any pretense of neutrality in this election.

The sub double digit IQ morons, Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews are prime examples of the "Peter Principle" run amok. They reached the level of their incompetence long ago. Nevertheless, there they were, angry and distraught that NBC refused to slot them into Tim Russert's position.

One must laugh at the nightly comedy routine these 2 morons preside over at MSNBC presented in the guise of "News".

When newspapers are dying and polls show only 21% of poll respondents say they believe all or most of what the NY Times prints, you know it's time to turn off the lights; the party is over.

Broadcast news fairs no better. Americans just don't trust them to tell the truth.

This overblown lying by the press about Sarah Palin only reinforces the view that the news media are totally untrustworthy and their bias could be cut with a knife.

IP: Logged

Mannu
Knowflake

Posts: 45
From: always here and no where
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 03, 2008 11:59 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mannu     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yeah, I watch Keith Olbermann and forget about it at end of the show. No substance really. Pure entertainment.


Chris Matthews is ok.


IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2011

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a