posted July 30, 2015 04:27 PM
I like your idea a lot, Ikja, for this thread I agree with Orange, your interpretation is permeated with your desire and your emotional investment, which happens when we draw for ourselves, especially with emotional matters.
There's also another problem here. They are too open, the questions, in the sense that IMO first you need to identify if anything happens at all. This happens for instance when people ask about feelings. Most people ask: what are his feelings for me? However this poses a problem, at least to me, because the first thing to know is if the other person has any romantic feelings at all, so I always ask this first.
Doing a spread for feelings for someone who is your ex or current bf, and for your neighbor for instance are totally different things IMO and the cards can be very misleading.
I would have probably asked first: will anything happen between me and X tomorrow? and then the detail spread.
With Leno, and Tarot, with cards in general, at least this is my approach, you get to the matter step by step rather than using a chunk spread, for more accuracy.
Of course, this is just my input on your thread.
I would have seen : fighting with/about another woman and/or a house, or sexual attraction between him and another woman for the first
and
unexpected trip because of a child or in an automobile etc.
if you determined whether anything happens between you two first, it would have been a trip between you two, maybe, as alternative
ahh, ok the same as orange
I totally agree with you, Leno is tricky tricky
I have some cool examples too:
whip book tower
I thought about meeting/seeing an unknown or former college pal clubs man in town
instead, I had a fight about my credit card (book is the card, and book tower the bank here)
clover tower for a yes on an exam
instead, it only depicted a phone call: my clover has two bugs with trumpets on it
The ineffable charm of Leno