posted July 02, 2003 08:20 AM         

I would love to know the source of your information. Are you getting this from books? Is this something you have experienced yourself?

Love and Light,

posted July 03, 2003 10:30 AM         

Meili -

Questions - As there are only thousands of stars (as opposed to millions or billions) visible to the naked eye, how can a student relate to his or her "soul star" if it is not one which is visible? Do different individuals share the same star (and thus the same soul)? How many individual bodies are represented by each star?

I have an attraction to the Orion constellation ... does this mean anything?

posted July 03, 2003 05:08 PM         

My "curiousity" is a bit more than merely trivial. But perhaps not quite "studious" enough to qualify for the dissemination of information.

Thank you for your explanations.

posted July 04, 2003 10:53 AM         

Thank you for coming to Lindaland. I really enjoy reading what you have to say. Thank you for sharing your wisdom with us.

Regarding your response:

"Do not look at me (but rather) take what is in my hand".

Unfortunately I come from a place where too many times I have taken things at face value, placed my trust in people who did not have my best interest at heart and therefore, have learned never to take anything from anyone without knowing it's source.

I was just wondering is your source of knowledge from a religious text? I think it is wonderful but I would like to know it's origin.

Love and Light,

posted July 09, 2003 09:25 AM         

Accepting things on blind faith dosen't work around here....

You may imaprt knowledge, but if books don't matter, why are you in Linda land??

We like to share around here, and learn as well as teach.

Sometimes "Trivial" things trigger knowledge we have forgotten.

Sometimes the ride is as fun as getting there!

posted July 09, 2003 09:58 AM         

I don't think you're in the position to judge what would or would not benefit Heidi, or anyone else, except for yourself. Would she be 'convinced,' or have knowing, if given a paper trail? No one can determine that, except the recipient of said knowledge. And again, it is useful to understand how knowing has come to be, whether it has been intuited, received, or researched.

Stating the reality of the situation...well, I would say that's your interpretation. You've denied the knowledge of what you deem 'reality' to those of us who might be curious.

If you are not here to convince, that's fine...but why are you here? Why post such cryptic messages at all, if you are not willing to share? Why present something as truth (which you indeed have done), and refuse to discuss its specifics further, or provide the source of the truth (even if the source is your own intuition)?

You're right, once the knowledge is out there, it's out of your control. Others will process it as they will, and come to their own conclusions. No one here is 'greedy,' by your definition...but all of us thirst.

No one is asking for you to be a teacher. No one is asking for you to be a guru. The only queries are for honest discussion...and your reticence to do so, makes you, well, suspect. This forum, this site, exists FOR discussion.

We all arrived here through the works of Linda Goodman, a woman who believed we are responsible for our own lives and decisions, who often pointed us towards interesting paths on which we might choose to walk and learn about ourselves and the universe. She believed it was imperative that we find our own way to inner knowing...but she shared her own sense of knowing, and while being protective of some of her sources, she always shared the means by which she arrived at her conclusions...then sent us off to find our own ways. Those are the hallmarks of a true teacher, and she is a woman I admire for her strength, courage, and insights.

posted July 10, 2003 01:42 PM         

I understand the frustration of some of the others, and I am certain you do as well, but I urge you to not take leave of us just yet.

Your answers may appear somewhat enigmatic and could be taken in the wrong spirit, but you know as well as I that the apparent upset of another is simply a vibratory response, and is to be expected at times.

As elusive as your statements and explanations may be, they do not fail to give one a spiraling of thought, and I believe this to be more important than the information itself.

posted July 14, 2003 12:37 AM         

As far as this thread goes, I like to think that maybe our souls have corrosponding stars, except I just can't. I believe that many stars have planets, and each planet could have a few billion people - if you do the maths, you'll realize that it is am\n impossible notion, unless the ratio of stars to planets is billions to a few... I find the notion of having a corrospnding star romantic and poetic, but can't base it in fact. In either case, who am I to say that my "image" of reality is a positive or negative thing or one that will give me great wisdom and enable teachings that will lift people above any negative circumstances (which I think *should* be the aim of TRUE knowledge). I love "Linda's" saying "The teacher will teach when the student is ready"... and not before. I believe certain knowledge is not needed by everyone, but can certainly be useful as spirals into where ever they take you, which as mentioned by Annie: "Sometimes the ride is as fun as getting there!"

I do NOT believe knowledge should be demanded, but received like a gift, and given as a present - both of which need mutual understanding between both parties.

posted July 16, 2003 08:47 AM         

Just one opinion among many