|
Author
|
Topic: Birth, Soul, Destiny, Personality & Linda
|
Elewolfe
Knowflake Posts: 23
From: UK
Registered: Jan 2003
|
posted July 18, 2003 05:54 AM
 
Does anyone follow the pythagoran system of splitting the name in vowel etc but use Linda's numeric alphabet? Do you find you get more accuracy from doing this or do you think the method she uses is better?Thanks IP: Logged |
Aselzion
Moderator Posts: 796
From: Peabody, MA USA
Registered: Nov 2002
|
posted July 19, 2003 02:56 AM
Hey there...
It isn't a matter of better or worse, both work! It's a matter of personal preference, and what it is you are looking for.
I think the Chaldean System is a bit more esoteric in it's application and I find the Pythagorean very accurate in more exoteric terms. In my actual practice I often combine them both and get a more clear understanding of the Individual. Sometimes you will note a marked similarity in the numbers, other times the different systems will show different facets of the individual's multi-layered personality. Hope that helps a wee bit.. In the Light...
A  ------------------
"It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye." - Antoine de Saint Exupery, The Little Prince IP: Logged |
Elewolfe
Knowflake Posts: 23
From: UK
Registered: Jan 2003
|
posted July 20, 2003 03:36 AM
Thanks for that Aselzion, but say you have to write about it, would you use the Chaldean or Pythagoras? It's just that if those that are reading it don't understand either it may be better to focus on just one of them, don't you think? I understand what you mean about using both, though, I can see the facets of the individual in both systems, but if you are writing about it I think it might just make it more confusing. Your opinion is much appreciated :-)Thanks for your time. IP: Logged | |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
