posted April 11, 2004 12:07 PM         

-- /Simplicity is not a crime. Nor is it simple./

posted July 22, 2004 08:58 PM         

Ive been rereading these posts and I think this should be close to the others so all knowflakes can find them easily

posted August 10, 2004 07:00 PM         

I truly do find it fascinating though how many values come from the Tektractis. I just kind of think, like Daf said "so what"? It's interesting, yet pointless. It's like Free Masonry in general. They may hold info that is quite similar and makes them feel important, but how does it affect us? I may show my ignorance here with Freemasonry as they could have power over society, but then there are millions of cospiracy theories we could debate also. At the end of the day, this stuff continually gives me a dual feeling of interest and indifference. But also as Daf says, he didn't feel what some of the things Petron wrote, as I don't feel for most of the thing syou both wrote. But that's just me. Interested, but indifferent. I tru;y don't mean o be harsh here, and I think many people out there would love to know this stuff, but I also wish more people were aware of Linda's interpretation of the Chaldean system which I think is truly magical, but that's just me. The problem is you can't intellectualise Chaldean numerology, nor can you really learn more truths from it (unless you study Chaldea and interpret it yourself). So what I think (not that it matters) is that it's good both Daf and Petron have this passion to unlock numbers, I also think there is a lot more to discover in life.

Heaps of Love,
Dean.

posted August 14, 2004 02:36 AM         

now he is seeming to espouse sufism , which strikes me as a form of pantheism, with many parallels to the mithraic mysteries( geez how mithraic is the concept of "djinn"??), but he only wants to pass out his message with no "debate"

as a matter of fact the only diagram i could find on the net by Ibn Arabi contained within it another mithraic formula for 666 generated by the tetraktys

posted August 23, 2004 01:33 AM         

what mirror have you held up to me?? because of your preconceptions, you project your own disdain for math and science onto me.
i introduced you to the Godel theorem and chaos theory to show it has been proven already the severe self imposed limitations and contradictions that arise in any rigid system like aristotlean logic or premise based mathematics .
the best mathematicians and scientists in history have understood well the holistic approach reveals more truths than the reductionist view of the creation, which tends towards the eventual conclusion of a mechanized, pre destined, clockwork universe...
thats why i suggested that all four "beasts" must hold clues to solve the puzzle of the tetraktys...looking at just "that one" wouldnt have told me anything
which is why i emphasize that those great scientific and spiritual men likely pondered GOD more sincerely than the average religious evangelist or priest... youve probly never studied Johannes Kepler's work as i suggested...
is it even possible for a dirt mind,constrained by shape and number, to transcend the dualistic concept of Creator and Created, and write it down with only 26 letters?
i dont know but i certainly didnt intend to be more "useful" to you if you were going to start slandering great teachers who dwell in heaven
all you had to do was face my questions before these witnesses and i would have continued to share, but instead you answer evryones questions BUT mine....thats too bad because i know many of the correct questions....

again i say, you are the one whose words here speak of "evidence" and "proof", so now you will just leave without offering it?

so then it must be time for you to pop up somewhere else and say, once again, "i just completed a two year scientific experiment where i used subtle psychological manipulations to determine what buttons really **** people off when i repeatedly push them..."

0+
21+
543+
9+87+6=
---------
666

0+
89+
567+
1+2+3+4=
---------
666

posted August 25, 2004 04:48 PM         

how really humble...

so the philosopher and lucifer are chatting. and lucifer says 'there's no God."

the philosopher blinks and says: really? than what is the point of this conversation? "

lucifer says -- 'well there's no God, i just wanted you to know.'

"No WHAT? I repeat my question -- what are we atlking about? Had to clarify. I mean -- if there's no -- what you say -- then what is thepoint of this conversation? I mnean the subject -- the jist of it?"

"you're so arrogant," says Lucifer. But them it fades away, defeated by logic.

hey -- don't disable your smiley today

alkmi