Lindaland
  Uni-versal Codes
  Numerology Question...when naming a product

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Numerology Question...when naming a product
trillian
Moderator

Posts: 1694
From: The Boundless
Registered: Mar 2003

posted May 18, 2004 10:41 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for trillian     Edit/Delete Message
I'm helping someone name a product.
One of the possible names, includes a number.
No decision whether the numeral will appear, or the spelling.

In any event, when doing the numerology, which would one use? The value of say, the number 7, or the value of the spelled word 'seven?'

Thanks for any insight...

IP: Logged

sesame
Knowflake

Posts: 82
From: Brisbane, QLD, Oz
Registered: Nov 2003

posted May 18, 2004 07:14 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for sesame     Edit/Delete Message
It's a problem for me too. If the spelling is used, I'd definitely use that, but numbers could be considered in the word or seperately, or indeed omitted - or maybe considered independently. For example, King Richard the third, the 3rd, III (three i's), etc. could all be used so I don't know. My program was modified a while back to include numbers, but they are added alongside the letters in a word - not seperately. This is because I believe numbers should be correlated with letters as they are one and the same in many ways, but I don't know what Linda believed...

------------------
Imagination is more important than memory!
My numerology program based on "Star Signs" by Linda Goodman
Logically Magical Logic is Magically Logical Magic! (and vice versa!)

IP: Logged

trillian
Moderator

Posts: 1694
From: The Boundless
Registered: Mar 2003

posted May 18, 2004 07:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for trillian     Edit/Delete Message
Thanks for that, glad I wasn't the only one confounded by it.

IP: Logged

trillian
Moderator

Posts: 1694
From: The Boundless
Registered: Mar 2003

posted May 19, 2004 11:52 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for trillian     Edit/Delete Message
Oh, I was thinking...if you use Richard III, those aren't really i's. They're Roman Numerals representing the number 3. They're only i's on our keyboards. IX is the number 9, not really an i and an x.

My Cappy moon must have made me post this.

IP: Logged

sesame
Knowflake

Posts: 82
From: Brisbane, QLD, Oz
Registered: Nov 2003

posted May 19, 2004 06:43 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for sesame     Edit/Delete Message
Yes, but they may also be spelt with lower case i's. Likewise MCMXLVII are all letters I think we could use instead of the number. In the case above, i=1 so iii=3 anyway, but other roman numerals won't work. I think the rule of thumb is that every letter equals a number. seven = 6. therefore seven7 = 13. seven 7 = 13, but each should be reduced first. etc. I'd just try all combinations and see how they relate.

Have fun!
Dean.

------------------
Imagination is more important than memory!
My numerology program based on "Star Signs" by Linda Goodman
Logically Magical Logic is Magically Logical Magic! (and vice versa!)

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2004

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a