|
Author
|
Topic: Thnx Dean!
|
numero_uno_0
Knowflake Posts: 12
From: New Delhi, India
Registered: Mar 2006
|
posted June 07, 2006 03:36 AM
 
Dear Dean,
Thnx for the detail answer. Yes, it was very useful. It did explain the points which were confusing for me.But what about the destiny numbers (the sum of the entire d.o.b.)? Should we take those numbers as they are or should we reduce them to the lowest possible compound number?
e.g. if someone has 28 as the sum of the entire d.o.b., should we take 28 as his destiny number or should we reduce 28 to 10 and then take 10 as the destiny number. Enlighten me... IP: Logged |
sesame
Moderator Posts: 1311
From: Oz
Registered: Nov 2003
|
posted June 08, 2006 10:43 PM
Well, now your pushing the boundaries of my understanding (note I didn't say knowledge as we left that a while ago ;P ). I would say the hard and fast rule is to never reduce the numbers unless they are apart of something bigger. The overall date would be considered as a compound (the first compound you get) and the single it reduces to. The way I see it, things are fairly organic. If you had 28, then I feel there would be elements of 10 as it is a part of the number and is within the reduction process so I think it could exist, but I would never put that up in court to take someone down.Happy counting, Dean. ------------------
I realized it for the first time in my life:
there is nothing but mystery in the world,
how it hides behind the fabric of our poor,
browbeat days, shining brightly, and we don't even know it. Sue Monk Kidd, "The Secret Life of Bees", p79 My numerology program based on "Star Signs" by Linda Goodman
Logically Magical Logic is Magically Logical Magic! (and vice versa!) IP: Logged | |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
