While The Soul Slumbers
  The other values of the letters C H X

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   The other values of the letters C H X

Posts: 1024
Registered: Aug 2013

posted January 21, 2014 06:00 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for NoRainNoRainbows     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Well such i haven't seen anyone mention this before on this forum, will put it here.

As she herslef says she (L.Goodman) got her numerology numbers from Cherio, and if you read both books, there was a lot of 'copy and paste' just a bit more expansion on the number 12 in Goodman's book.

Now if you do read a lot about the other numerology systems you may have come across astrologer Sepharial and his many great works a long time ago. And also along with him Johari, who is Indian, the same people that Cherio learned numbers from.

Now of course chaldean numerology goes back to the middle east, just like Hebrew geometric numerology...and so i think we should give credit to the values that will give us almost the same 'reduced' number.

for example....the word Xerox, will be a 24=6 using the chaldean number alphabet passed on by Cherio/goodman.

while it will add up to a 26=8 using Sepharial and now Harish Johari's number values.

using the Hebrew system Xerox=71=8.

there is a big difference between the influence of the number 6 and the influence of the number just a point to keep in mind.
in this way these are the values of these letters:
C- 2 Not 3 (11 in the Hebrew way so will just make a whole other thread for this at another time)
H- 8 not 5
X- 6 not 5

IP: Logged


Posts: 36705
From: Saturn next to Charmainec
Registered: Apr 2009

posted January 27, 2014 02:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks, Rain! That would take me to a 42, which is the same as a 24. The former way makes my last name a 22, which doesn't reduce. This new way makes it a 23, which does reduce, but it's allowable not to reduce to get a compound number: 19 + 23 = 42.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us |

Copyright 2000-2014

Powered by Infopop © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a