Author
|
Topic: Blessed
|
Eyeful unregistered
|
posted December 28, 2018 04:49 AM
Hello, Knowflakes, and hello, Webmaster!Since you've made a forum for introductions, I suppose I should make one. I'm a metaphysician and a fan of Linda's work for many years. I walk a strange and narrow path, and like many of you, I don't always know why I'm here. I would tell you more but it's been a long (though bright and beautiful!) day here in Cripple Creek, and I'm late for a date with the Sandman. IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 106402 From: From a galaxy, far, far away... Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted December 28, 2018 09:26 AM
Welcome!IP: Logged |
Eyeful unregistered
|
posted December 28, 2018 10:05 AM
Thank you. I saw in another thread that you study law -- which intrigues me because I've studied it a bit, myself. What is the most interesting thing you've learned about it? IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 106402 From: From a galaxy, far, far away... Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 03, 2019 04:38 PM
That I thought I knew a lot about it, but what I realized is that I didn't know what I didn't know.IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 106402 From: From a galaxy, far, far away... Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 04, 2019 06:01 PM
It is a massive amount.IP: Logged |
Eyeful unregistered
|
posted January 21, 2019 01:28 AM
Do you prefer Natural Law or Positivism?IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 106402 From: From a galaxy, far, far away... Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 21, 2019 03:07 PM
Positivism.IP: Logged |
Eyeful unregistered
|
posted January 21, 2019 06:12 PM
I'm surprised by your immediate candor.Now, why? The danger, of course, is that under Positivism the same government that grants you your rights can legislate them away tomorrow (meaning they aren't actually "rights" as I understand the word's best definition to be, but merely privileges); while under Natural Law, one's rights are allodial and can never be "taken". IP: Logged |
ballerina Moderator Posts: 428 From: A Place on Earth Registered: Feb 2014
|
posted January 21, 2019 08:30 PM
Welcome, Eyeful!I took the question to mean spiritually... ------------------ All my love, with all my Heart lotusheartone/Emeraldopal IP: Logged |
ballerina Moderator Posts: 428 From: A Place on Earth Registered: Feb 2014
|
posted January 21, 2019 08:32 PM
Are you a member from the past?------------------ All my love, with all my Heart lotusheartone/Emeraldopal IP: Logged |
Eyeful unregistered
|
posted January 21, 2019 11:17 PM
There's nothing spiritual about Man's laws, ballerina. They are merely the false appearance of morality that violent coercion clothes itself in so that its victims will accept it.And the only thing I've ever been a member of is an extremely exclusive club for Truth-addicts. The standards for admission are so high that the membership has never exceeded 1. IP: Logged |
ballerina Moderator Posts: 428 From: A Place on Earth Registered: Feb 2014
|
posted January 21, 2019 11:39 PM
I felt a gut=tug...I noticed how gracefully you were maneuvering through the forums, and it made me feel that you had been here for a while.. The Truth is Mighty and above all things! ------------------ All my love, with all my Heart lotusheartone/Emeraldopal IP: Logged |
ballerina Moderator Posts: 428 From: A Place on Earth Registered: Feb 2014
|
posted January 22, 2019 12:06 AM
I was curious and looked up positivism...What I got from a few definitions.. Is the belief that you must observe, experience, and then with logic and common sense you can find Truth... Meaning there is no Truth in the unknown, or unseen, lacking material experience No Truth in the metaphysical! Yikes! giggles I could not find your definition... I love Learning and Growing! ------------------ All my love, with all my Heart lotusheartone/Emeraldopal IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 106402 From: From a galaxy, far, far away... Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 22, 2019 12:55 AM
Natural law is only based upon perception and biases that we lable as morality.IP: Logged |
Eyeful unregistered
|
posted January 22, 2019 01:32 AM
Speaking of graceful maneuvering: Randall himself might be a ballerina, he skirted my point so adroitly!I would disagree with that last statement, Randall -- though I expected a response in that vein from a Capricorn. Positive law is as concretely defined as are words themselves (though definition is an endless circular morass, in itself -- to my everlasting consternation). Natural Law is too "ethereal" for an Earth sign's tastes. That's basically what you've said, is it not? I wouldn't say "perception and biases", I would say "commonly-held perceptions" -- commonly held by all but sociopaths and psychopaths, that is. Empathy is intrinsic to all healthy and fully-functional human beings, and it is empathy that is the basis for morality. Call that a bias, if you like, but it's still unquestionably within each one of us -- which means it doesn't need to be pedantically defined by words (which are finite/limited and can never ultimately contain reality, anyway). No one needs to be told that murder is wrong; no one needs to be told that rape is wrong; no one needs to be told that theft is wrong (again, sociopaths and psychopaths excepted). Conscience is intrinsic to humanity (and conscience is the voice of empathy). There is a man named Kal Molinet, in Virginia, who regularly goes out into the streets and helps others realize that Man's laws are not needed and are actually a hindrance rather than a help to natural, productive self-actualization (life). He does this first by asking individuals if they, too, share these commonalities of empathy/morality, and I seriously doubt he has ever received an answer in the negative. He speaks very quickly, but if you pay attention closely to this interchange, it demonstrates what I'm describing very well and in a very *ahem* down-to-earth way: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1-yCYtvt10 Don't get triggered by the social baggage that's attached to a particular word, mmmkay? I'm expecting better of you here. Mad Max is just a movie. --- ballerina: "Positivism", in the political or lawful sense, is the idea that your rights are granted to you by your government. Positivism stands in contrast to Natural Law, which asserts that your rights are inherent. IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 106402 From: From a galaxy, far, far away... Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 22, 2019 09:55 AM
By biases, I mean religious beliefs. Basic human rights are inherent, but our rights as they stand today stem from the Constitution and case law. Of course, I only speak from the vantage point of the U.S., which is where I live and will practice law. IP: Logged |
ballerina Moderator Posts: 428 From: A Place on Earth Registered: Feb 2014
|
posted January 22, 2019 10:10 AM
I thank both of you for this lesson It's very interesting!------------------ All my love, with all my Heart lotusheartone/Emeraldopal IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 106402 From: From a galaxy, far, far away... Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 23, 2019 01:58 PM
If I didn't believe in positivism, what would be the point in becoming a lawyer?IP: Logged |
Eyeful unregistered
|
posted January 23, 2019 04:52 PM
Attorney. What you meant to ask was, "...what would be the point of my becoming an attorney?" There's a very important difference between the two, Randy -- and that difference is the kind of thing they're not going to teach you at a law school. They really don't want you to be able to defend anyone's Creator-endowed rights; they just want you to be a good, obedient, little officer of the court.Are you ready yet to stop RUDELY ignoring my important questions, as you have done all these years, and have a real conversation with me? (Not publicly; not here.) IP: Logged |
ballerina Moderator Posts: 428 From: A Place on Earth Registered: Feb 2014
|
posted January 23, 2019 11:15 PM
Eyeful, this seems personal to me. I think you should give the webmaster, the respect he deserves!There is a contact option you can use, which I am sure you are aware of...
------------------ All my love, with all my Heart lotusheartone/Emeraldopal IP: Logged |
Eyeful unregistered
|
posted January 24, 2019 06:50 AM
Does he deserve respect, ballerina?Let's describe a sick situation plainly: For years I've watched j.w.hop emotionally abuse those who are intellectually slower and emotionally softer. And this is done under the banner of, and besmirches the name of, Linda Goodman, who doesn't deserve to be associated with anything so vile. Randall ennables this while satisfying his cold-hearted Capricorn ambition: to own the biggest Linda Goodman site going, as he swore he would when he and his nasty little troll cohort were kicked out of CE. You know what I've discovered about myself, over the years? There's no "give up" in me. Not a drop. And goat-boy's biggest mistake has been to try to rudely ignore my sincere concerns. He thinks he's in such a safe position of power that he can get away with it -- that he can get away with all the wrongness I just described. They both do. How short-sighted! Like too many, they seem bent on refusing to see the Truth until they're given no option. So be it. IP: Logged |
ballerina Moderator Posts: 428 From: A Place on Earth Registered: Feb 2014
|
posted January 24, 2019 11:06 AM
Eyeful,Rudeness, is something Linda wouldn't approve of! Global Unity 2.0 is basically the forum That has this kind of conversation, and I blame it on politics... I've been here since 2005, know about CE.. Over 13 years Randall has earned my Respect.. I found me here, in Lindaland, not CE Why lower yourself to a level of disrespect! Our actions have re-Actions, undertake to do all with Love and Understanding. ... And again this sounds personal! There is the Contact Us option at the bottom of the forums... ------------------ All my love, with all my Heart lotusheartone/Emeraldopal IP: Logged |
Eyeful unregistered
|
posted January 24, 2019 11:46 AM
You ask me, "why lower yourself to a level of disrespect?" And I understand why, and I approve.But -- why do you not ask this of jwhop? Why is he the only exception to the Golden Rule here? Why is he untouchable here? Apply your precepts equally to all, or don't apply them. IP: Logged |
Eyeful unregistered
|
posted January 24, 2019 11:48 AM
And, for the record, I have used the contact form before. When I do that, I am completely ignored. I will not be ignored! Especially when my cause is just.IP: Logged |
Eyeful unregistered
|
posted January 24, 2019 11:51 AM
I also agree with you completely, that rudeness is something Linda wouldn't approve of. Hence, jwhop's long history of emotionally abusing others is something Linda wouldn't approve of. And neither do I.Please, please don't be a hypocrite and champion of double standards. That's a Randall thing to do. Others have been banned for merely stating the facts and demanding equal treatment, yet "Nasty Nate" is protected unquestioningly. Do you not perceive this as immoral and wrong? IP: Logged |