Lindaland
  Astrology 2.0
  For once, and for all-- can someone help with this ascendent/first house question?

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   For once, and for all-- can someone help with this ascendent/first house question?
future_uncertain
Knowflake

Posts: 3
From:
Registered: May 2009

posted December 25, 2008 10:27 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for future_uncertain     Edit/Delete Message
In the event that your rising sign is of a late degree, thereby making the vast majority of the first house occupied by the sign after the ascending sign, how should your first house be interpreted?

Does this make any difference, or do we truly only look at the sign on the cusp of each house?

If so, (if I'm using equal house, for the sake of simplicity)then in my chart only 2.5 degrees of any given house belong to the sign on the cusp.

Help!

IP: Logged

amowls
Knowflake

Posts: 4
From: Falls Church, VA, USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted December 26, 2008 12:46 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for amowls     Edit/Delete Message
The sign on your cusp is what your Ascendant is. If you have a planet in your first, like Mercury, and it's in the next sign (like your ascendant is in Pisces but your Mercury is in Aries), you'd interpret that planet as the sign that its in and it still shines in your first.

My Ascendant is at 27 Gemini. The majority of my first is taken up by Cancer, but I'm still Gemini Rising.

Libra rules my 5th house. I have Pluto in that house but it's in Scorpio. Pluto is in Scorpio in my 5th, and is augmented by the fact that the cusp is in Libra.

IP: Logged

future_uncertain
Knowflake

Posts: 3
From:
Registered: May 2009

posted December 26, 2008 09:52 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for future_uncertain     Edit/Delete Message
I think what bothers me is that so many interpretations make the assumption that if your ascendant is one sign, then the entire first house is influenced solely by that sign, and then the interpretations go on to describe your second, third, fourth house, etc... it's very general.

I like what you said about the cusp sign augmenting the non-cusp-sign placements within the house. That I can buy.

Thanks for your response!

IP: Logged

future_uncertain
Knowflake

Posts: 3
From:
Registered: May 2009

posted December 26, 2008 09:55 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for future_uncertain     Edit/Delete Message
...which leads me to another question: when you say augments, do you mean that you combine the significance of 5th house Libra with the placement of Pluto in Scorpio in the fifth? (As in, both apply?)

IP: Logged

future_uncertain
Knowflake

Posts: 3
From:
Registered: May 2009

posted December 26, 2008 10:10 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for future_uncertain     Edit/Delete Message
I think what I mean is that my ascendant is Sag, but the majority of my first house is Capricorn. I identify strongly with that, but most interpretations don't give me that analysis because my first house is read as Sagittarius.

This would make my 2nd house Capricorn, but in my second I have Venus in Aquarius, and these are two very different energies.

I get confused because most interpretations are all or nothing, and those analyses don't ring true for me, however, I also don't think I can pick and choose which interpretations feel right...

Forgive my Libra moon while I sort through this.

IP: Logged

future_uncertain
Knowflake

Posts: 3
From:
Registered: May 2009

posted December 26, 2008 10:10 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for future_uncertain     Edit/Delete Message
dp

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2008

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a