posted January 16, 2009 06:17 PM         

and its a bunch of crap that aspect x,y,z are difficlut to handle, in my little experience i hv seen all bad kind of aspects (even uranus) in marraige and long term relationships...so dont worry

sometimes i feel....astrology has also become a tool to work out our modern convenient way of living,....like we want to pick n chose what aspects r convenient..we even want to run consumer report analysis b4 indulgung in a relationship...........hmmmm wht to pick from the menu list of reaady-to-eat items....

posted January 16, 2009 07:03 PM         

When you read about Sting's parents' relationship and realize how bad their relationship modeling was for him, you can see how he has different relationship needs and aversions than the "average" romantic ideals. Everyone's got different relationship ideals. If extra freedom is a requirement for both people in a relationship then those tense Uranus aspects could possibly work.

When you look at the synastry comparison of Jessica Simpson and Nick Lache, you can see that her Uranus conjuncts his Sun in Scorpio. I'm sure that their first meeting was immediate magnetic attraction and excitement and adventure, but they couldn't sustain a long term relationship with that much intensity. I think they were really in love and that if they continued to tour separately on a regular basis, their marriage could have worked, but they wanted traditional committment, they just couldn't have it with each other.

I know a couple who have been married since 2004, they are 47 and 50. Her Uranus opposes his Moon and squares his Sun. I thought they would do alright but there seems to be some very rocky Solar Arcs and transits to their marriage chart this March so we'll see.