Lindaland
  Astrology 2.0
  Forer Effect or Similar Astrological Configurations?

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Forer Effect or Similar Astrological Configurations?
Glaucus
Knowflake

Posts: 163
From: Sacramento,California
Registered: Apr 2009

posted May 11, 2009 11:36 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Glaucus     Edit/Delete Message
I have been wondering about the validity of the tropical zodiac. Vedic Astrologers and Cyril Fagan Astrologers believe that sidereal zodiac is the right one. Some believe in no zodiac like Uranian Astrologers. Cosmobiologists put little emphasis on zodiac astrology too. Michel Gauquelin wasn't into zodiac astrology. Johannes Kepler didn't believe in it either.

Astrological skeptics believe that we identify with our tropical zodiac charts because of the Forer Effect.

The Forer effect (also called personal validation fallacy or the Barnum Effect after P. T. Barnum's observation that "we've got something for everyone") is the observation that individuals will give high accuracy ratings to descriptions of their personality that supposedly are tailored specifically for them, but are in fact vague and general enough to apply to a wide range of people. The Forer effect can provide a partial explanation for the widespread acceptance of some beliefs and practices, such as astrology, fortune telling, and some types of personality tests.


I thought about the possibility of maybe I identify with my tropical zodiac chart because of the Forer Effect.


Then I thought that maybe there are configurations in my chart that might account for me being able to relate to my tropical chart.


It seems that there are great deal of configurations that can account for me to be able to relate to my tropical chart ,and so it may not be the Forer Effect in my case.
Of course, astrological skeptics would say that all the configurations are Forer Effect any way.


Sun in Scorpio
Sun contraparallel Pluto - '42
Sun contraparallel Orcus (large plutino) - '01
Sun conjunct Ixion (large plutino) - '05
Sun conjunct Jupiter/Pluto midpoint - '45
Sun square Pluto/Midheaven midpoint - '42
Sun conjunct Neptune/Pluto midpoint - '33 in Right Ascension
Pluto square Sun/Mars midpoint - '13
(Sun,Mars,Pluto in Golden Section Triangle)
Moon sesquiquadrate Sun/Pluto - '05
Alpha Cancer,Acubens in culminating (becomes active prime year,29 until death) with Sun....themes are life and resurrection

Mercury in Scorpio
(Mercury in Libra constellation which was once known as the Scorpion's Claws .....the theme of the constellation is justice,death,and final judgment)
Mercury conjunct South Heliocentric Mars Node - 1'00
Mercury sextile Geocentric South Pluto Node - '02

Venus in Scorpio,Pluto in Libra
(Venus in Libra constellation which was once known as the Scorpion's Claws .....the theme of the constellation is justice,death,and final judgment)
Venus square Mars - 4'05
Mars is in culminating (becomes active in prime until death) paran with Beta Perseus, Algol, the Gorgon's head, which is intense female passion
Venus trine Orcus (large plutino) - '41
Pluto square Venus/Node midpoint - '17
Midheaven sesquiquadrate Venus/Pluto midpoint - '05
Venus trine Geocentric North Pluto Node - '30

Moon in Pisces
Moon square Neptune - 1'22
Moon oppose Saturn/Neptune midpoint - '17
Moon sextile Sedna (large transneptunian named after Inuit Sea Goddess) - 1'05 ('39 in Right Ascension)
Moon oppose Neptune/Midheaven midpoint - '27 in Right Ascension

Mars in Aquarius
Mars in Aquarius constellation
Uranus oppose Mars/Saturn midpoint - '17
Sun semisquare Mars/Uranus - '15

Jupiter in Sagittarius
Alpha Andromeda,Alpheratz is in rising (become active from birth until death) paran with Jupiter - themes are freedom,love of movement,speed, and the sheer joy of the wind in one's hair.....Alpheratz is aka navel of Pegasus,the winged horse
Alpheratz is also my heliacal setting star
Jupiter trine Chiron - 2'15

Saturn in Gemini
Mercury contraparallel Saturn - '38
Mars oppose Mercury/Saturn midpoint - '50

Uranus in Libra
Uranus semisquare Venus/Jupiter - '15

Neptune in Sagittarius
Jupiter conjunct Neptune - 6'28
Saturn oppose Jupiter/Neptune midpoint - '05
Neptune semisquare Mars/Jupiter midpoint - '17
Jupiter semisquare Neptune/Ascendant midpoint - '39


Virgo Ascendant
Hygeia parallel Ascendant - '20
Chiron contraparallel Ascendant - '21


Are there any configurations in your chart that could account for you being able to relate to your tropical zodiac chart?

I am very curious about people born in the Southern Hemisphere. I wonder what accounts for them to be able to relate to a northern hemisphere season-based zodiac chart.


Raymond

IP: Logged

amowls*
Knowflake

Posts: 127
From: richmond va
Registered: Apr 2009

posted May 11, 2009 04:59 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for amowls*     Edit/Delete Message
Lately I've been prompted to look deeper into my sidereal Chart.

I've noticed that a few of my sign placements are the same as my tropical. For instance my Rising Sign is still Gemini, my Venus is still in Pisces, my Mercury is still in Aquarius (important because my chart ruler is still in the same sign), Saturn/Uranus are still in Sagittarius, Jupiter is still in Aries.

I looked at the chart delineation on astro and it still has Sagittarius as the strongest sign, but Aquarius is no longer the second strongest, infact it is relatively weak (though my new MC is in Aquarius). Capricorn is now the second strongest.

IP: Logged

Coffee
Knowflake

Posts: 338
From: Leeds
Registered: Apr 2009

posted May 11, 2009 06:04 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Coffee     Edit/Delete Message
You are asking what type of aspect in our natal chart may show an interest in the tropical zoiac? Just looking to clarify.

IP: Logged

Glaucus
Knowflake

Posts: 163
From: Sacramento,California
Registered: Apr 2009

posted May 11, 2009 06:09 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Glaucus     Edit/Delete Message
No

I meant configurations in the chart that might account for me being able to relate to my tropical chart.


for example, I have Moon in tropical Pisces,but it's in the constellation of Aquarius

I have the following configurations that could account for me being able to relate to Moon in Pisces:

Moon square Neptune
Moon oppose Saturn/Neptune midpoint
Moon sextile Sedna
Moon oppose Neptune/Midheaven midpoint in Right Ascension


Raymond

IP: Logged

Coffee
Knowflake

Posts: 338
From: Leeds
Registered: Apr 2009

posted May 11, 2009 06:13 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Coffee     Edit/Delete Message
Ok, using your example, Moon square Neptune is similar to the tropical placement of Pisces rising due to both planets involved in that aspect.

IP: Logged

Glaucus
Knowflake

Posts: 163
From: Sacramento,California
Registered: Apr 2009

posted May 11, 2009 06:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Glaucus     Edit/Delete Message

similar

but I was mainly talking about configurations involving the same object

like Moon in Pisces = Moon square Neptune

Sun in Scorpio = Sun contraparallel Pluto


Raymond

IP: Logged

Coffee
Knowflake

Posts: 338
From: Leeds
Registered: Apr 2009

posted May 11, 2009 06:29 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Coffee     Edit/Delete Message
Ok.

Moon in Aries = Moon Q Mars.

Aqua Asc = Uranus conjunct Mars.

IP: Logged

Glaucus
Knowflake

Posts: 163
From: Sacramento,California
Registered: Apr 2009

posted May 11, 2009 07:04 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Glaucus     Edit/Delete Message

Uranus doesn't aspect your Ascendant in any way? not even Uranus Nodes? what about midpoints involving Uranus,Ascendant whether its a point,planet aspecting Uranus/Ascendant midpoint or Uranus aspecting a midpoint involving Ascendant or Ascendant aspecting a midpoint involving Uranus

Raymond

IP: Logged

Coffee
Knowflake

Posts: 338
From: Leeds
Registered: Apr 2009

posted May 11, 2009 08:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Coffee     Edit/Delete Message
Midpoints are for composites or working out aspects. You add them in a natal chart, you got too much to look at!

IP: Logged

Glaucus
Knowflake

Posts: 163
From: Sacramento,California
Registered: Apr 2009

posted May 11, 2009 08:12 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Glaucus     Edit/Delete Message

that doesn't mean that they are not valid for natal,synastry,transit,secondary progressions,nor solar arcs

midpoint pictures could easily account for zodiac configurations.

Like I said before, Uranian Astrologers don't use zodiac signs. Cosmobiologists don't put much emphasis on zodiac signs too. They believe that aspects and midpoint pictures are more insightful than planets,points in signs.

Cosmobiology,Uranian Astrology,and Magi Astrology use midpoints regularly. Noel Tyl does too with the use of looking at zodiac signs.

I believe that soft aspects shouldn't be used with midpoints. The orbs should be no more than 1 1/2 degrees,and that's for the direct midpoints. I use no more 1 degree for the indirect midpoints.


also midpoint pictures are based on harmonics and geometry.

for instance, I have Moon oppose Saturn/Neptune midpoint with 17 minutes of arc. That's because my Moon is square Saturn-Neptune opposition. A t-square which is a 4th harmonic triangle. On a 90 degree dial, it would appear as conjunct.

they don't have to be based on major aspects

for example I have Pluto square Sun/Mars midpoint, but they are not in major aspect to each other

but they are in Golden Section Triangle.

Theodor Landscheidt devised aspects based on golden section

when 3 planets aspect each other to form a golden section triangle, there is a corresponding midpoint picture


BTW there is no need to use exclamation points.


Raymond

IP: Logged

Coffee
Knowflake

Posts: 338
From: Leeds
Registered: Apr 2009

posted May 11, 2009 08:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Coffee     Edit/Delete Message
There is when emphasising a point!

It is a big point to make. Take the midpoint of every planet and you come up with a lot of interpretations. Too many.

IP: Logged

Glaucus
Knowflake

Posts: 163
From: Sacramento,California
Registered: Apr 2009

posted May 11, 2009 08:29 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Glaucus     Edit/Delete Message

and the midpoint picturess use much smaller orbs

also midpoint pictures involving Sun,Moon,Midheaven,and Ascendant are given considerably more weight.


the basis on geometry and harmonics make midpoints a valid concept.

especially when both signs and houses can be arbitrary.

some say house systems were based on errors

tropical zodiac signs were based on northern hemisphere seasons,but that didn't take into account people living in the southern hemisphere

the sidereal zodiac isn't completely aligned with the 13 zodiac constellations on the ecliptic.


I think that it all comes down to is what one believes and practices.

In that way, Astrology is like a religion.

there are numerous Astrological systems just like there are numerous religions. Like many religions can be valid, so can many astrological systems can be valid.

diversity

I am staying away from the Tower of Babel that Steven Forrest says is going on in the astrological community.


so

to each,his/her own


Raymond

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2008

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a