posted October 06, 2009 05:09 AM         

Looking at your chart, are you December or May dominated? And does this have an effect on whom you are attracted to(despite sun sign) based purely on month?

My chart suggests that I am december dominated as most of my Sagittarius planets are on the Sag-cap cusp(Sun, Jupiter, Neptune,Uranus).Would this suggest that I have a heigtened affinity with another December-dominated person? Maybe even Aril or August?

There are many sites that suggest that Aries and Sag are a good match, but experience teaches me that I fare much better with April Arians and Taurians than I do with march ones.

My mom and dad are another example of where there is supposed to be incompatibility, but after 23 years together (moon signs and other planets aside), I wondered whether I was overlooking the influence of their month of birth.

My mom is november 30(traditionally sagittarius) whilst my dad is July 18(typically cancer). Even numerology suggests that the number 2 and 7 have a compatibility affinity between them as both are "water" numbers.

On the other side,if I look at the months wholistically(star signs aside) I come to a conclusion that could explain why a "certain" cancer would do better with a gemini than a scorpion.

Hypothetically speaking;

A January born Aquarius/Capricorn will be attracted to each other as well as to a March born Pisces/ Aries.But they would not fare that well with an April born Aries/Taurus.

This demistifys the myth that Capricorn and Aries are not a good match.

A february born Aquarius/Pisces will be attracted to each other as well as to an April born Taurus/Aries etc. But they would be irritated with a May born Gemini/Taurus.

This could explain the discrepancy between Tropical and sidereal sun-signs and perhaps where they can meet?

When we take the over-estimated degree effect of signs and exclude it , we are left with the conclusion that people who often feel like they are "cusp signs" could have a point: Not because of their "cuspness" (:joker , but that the effect of Aries is still strong in their personality.

Example, should someone born on the 20th of April depend on mathematical precision and computer program so as to ascertain that they are one sign(Taurus) and not the other(Aries)? And this conclusion can only be valid according to mathematical degrees? Hmm, some logic is missing and should be re-applied.

Rather than opt to overlook the month of birth, perhaps if someone is born on the 21st of April(mathematically Taurus), they could strongly identify and be very compatible with someone born Dec 3(traditionally sagittarius) because they are born within an Aries dominated month?

Thus (technically speaking)if we are to include star signs,some Taurians are actually compatible to some sagittarians.