Posts: 166
From: New York, NY
Registered: Apr 2009

posted February 10, 2010 06:56 PM         

---

I was just perusing Google books and looking up various combos of sun/moon. Came to Taurus/Taurus and it says, inter alia, that the person is an ardent lover but an imperious lover.

So, first of all, how can anybody be an imperious lover? How do you love disdainfully? I don't get it. But let's say it's true... what about this combination would make someone act that way towards a lover? Anybody with some insight?

IP: Logged

Posts: 2959
From: aspideronmars
Registered: Apr 2009

posted February 10, 2010 07:00 PM         

---

All i know is that moon in taurus is EXTREMELY well hung

IP: Logged

Posts: 166
From: New York, NY
Registered: Apr 2009

posted February 10, 2010 07:05 PM         

---

will all the Taurus Moon men in the house please stand up?

LOL, just kidding. Lara started it!

IP: Logged

Posts: 373
From:
Registered: May 2009

posted February 10, 2010 07:06 PM         

---

1. What are the definitions of Ardent & imperious?

2. Where is the conflict?

3. What is your interpretation of the two?

All I remember of this Sun/Moon combination is 'double trouble and strong struggles for control in the relationship sphere' With a lot of stubborness and a marked lazy streak. The birth # (eg. 7th) with flavor the personality somewhat.

IP: Logged

Posts: 166
From: New York, NY
Registered: Apr 2009

posted February 10, 2010 07:22 PM         

---

It's not "ardent" I'm curious about. To me, ardent means doing something with passion/energy/verve. The word "imperious" tripped me up, because the definition of that in some dictionaries is "disdainful". So what are they saying, this person is passionate but looks down on their partner? That's what I want to know. C'est tout.

IP: Logged

Posts: 373
From:
Registered: May 2009

posted February 10, 2010 08:41 PM         

---

Imperious - domineering in a haughty manner; dictatorial; overbearing: an imperious manner; an imperious person.

Maybe the overwhelm their partner with passion. All consuming fiery passion.

IP: Logged

Posts: 72
From: las vegas, nevada, USA
Registered: Dec 2009

posted February 12, 2010 02:00 AM         

---

maybe it means controlling.. cause with the above definition it says domineering and dictorial. i know my uncle whos a taurus has a tendency to want to know everything thats going on in the people he cares about lives. what their going to eat. where their going..etc. and he'll usually comand you to eat certain things or go places with him haha. hes a lovely person nontheeeelessss

IP: Logged

Posts: 74
From: usa
Registered: Jul 2009

posted February 12, 2010 03:39 AM         

---

My interpretation of the passage is that the Taurus will be a judgmental lover, making sure the person is appropriate for their commitment. Or, can attempt to mold the person who may not be quite right, to their mind, into the perfect mate.

I think the reasoning is that, removing other influences, Taurus wants a lifelong relationship, but wants it to meet certain standards.

And I cosign with Lara.

IP: Logged

Posts: 451
From:
Registered: Jul 2009

posted February 12, 2010 02:16 PM         

---

I know someone with that combo.

He's generally calm and easy going, but when it comes to girlfriends he's picky and obsessive.

He's really, really, ridiculously good looking and gets hit on often. He's never interested back though. He's in his early 20s, and as far as I know has been interested in only 2 girls. He was/is obsessed with them.

Perhaps what bores him with other women is that because they don't feel like a perfect fit for him, he's unable to become obsessed with them. He wants them to be or have the potential to be his dream girl.

IP: Logged

Posts: 166
From: New York, NY
Registered: Apr 2009

posted February 13, 2010 07:49 AM         

---

hmmmmm, controlling maybe? Judgmental maybe? I wonder if that's what the author meant. Guess we'll never know, but thanks for the input, all who answered.

IP: Logged