posted February 16, 2010 09:04 AM         

would this change the baby s destiny?
i m trying to convince her to not do this esp bcs the baby would be born at 29 aqua which is anaretic and would have an aries moon -his mom s cappy his dad s libra.

if they respected the terms the baby would be born a pisces with jupiter in conjunction to the sun and a taurus moon, all much more balanced energywise. but she doesnt wanna listen to me.

why dont people let nature do its course..?
i see this induction as a wrong thing to do.

posted February 16, 2010 10:45 AM         

I just finished having a baby last year and I was in extreme worry mode about the baby's chart and ya know what it is just a waste of energy. The child will be born when he or she is born and when they take their first breath - there chart is set up. It is no use sitting there worrying about the perfect chart for the baby.....I think this was the advice given to me by some members here! Just google threads started by me in regards to my baby last year.

I sooooooooooooooooooo was dying for a Leo baby with an Aries moon and was not wanting a pisces moon baby. moon in Pisces would have been involved in an ugly T square and then I worried about, well what would that say about me as a mom. I thought and afflicted moon in my child's chart would show that she would have mother issues. Then I worried about that and thought that I am not an bad parent and I don't think my child should have mother issues et........

All that matters is that the baby is happy, healthy and loved.

posted February 16, 2010 10:59 AM         

My friend had her baby 3 months early by C section and i thought for sure there chart isnt matched up at all. But they had an exact sun and moon conjunction in leo. Exact venus and sun conjunction in cancer..

posted February 16, 2010 12:58 PM         

I believe that everything happens for a reason.

I believe that the new incarnated soul actually picks the moment of birth.

my mother something labor had stopped because I fell asleep, they had to induce labor or it would have been much longer than 23 hours.

Also I was born 1 month early. I didn't fit any stereotype of a premature baby. I came in at 7 lbs, 15 oz and 21 1/2 inches long.

Raymond

------------------
"Nothing matters absolutely;
the truth is it only matters relatively"

posted February 16, 2010 01:01 PM         

I had my eldest induced because my waters broke and then nothing happened. My youngest was breech and also induced (c-section).

posted February 16, 2010 01:20 PM         

like Lara says,why inducing if there s no medical problem?

exactly my point!

they (her, her family and her gynecologist friend)are just being anxious.
just like when she has some money in her hands she has to run and spend it.
they cant wait or hold. everything must be consumed or made happen fast.

posted February 16, 2010 01:27 PM         

maybe the 29th aqua is good for ladies only?

posted February 16, 2010 02:01 PM         

The second time, I had high blood pressure and the baby measured small in the womb and wasn't growing. They didn't see the baby thriving in me and decided to pull the plug.

Both inductions went very fast and both girls were delivered within 8 hours. The baby has that Aqua conj of Jupiter and Neptune at her Rising degree. Interesting...

Cynn

posted February 16, 2010 02:30 PM         

Raymond

------------------
"Nothing matters absolutely;
the truth is it only matters relatively"

posted February 16, 2010 10:27 PM         

tell your cousin not to let them induce especially not before the due date. give the baby a chance to come on its own time. the baby at least has a week after the due date. besides, that science of predicting conception and delivery is not perfect.

i'm pretty sure that doctors/pharmaceutical companies make some extra money by having to use pitocin to induce labor...

childbirth is a business these days. i hope she doesn't let the doctor pressure her. my friend just had a baby january 31st. the doctor tried to pressure her as well...she didn't go for it. it was unnecessary.

posted February 16, 2010 10:52 PM         

The most important thing is a healthy child, but factoring in astrology, I prefer the Pisces baby myself. I happen to know the gentleman at 29 Aqua (who does in fact have an Aries Moon) and he's a handful.

posted February 17, 2010 04:17 AM         

A friend's mother has 3 Cancer daughters and one Leo, she scheduled the conception and c-section dates for each of them based upon wanting them in the same month as herself. The Leo was able to slip in because she was the first c-section, an emergency, and wasn't scheduled. I thought that was interesting.

Recently, someone else and their wifeannounced they will be conceiving their first child this year and all of their kids will be born in January to give them an advantage in school. Meaning, they'll have 1-9 months more development than the other children.

My mother chose my birthdate as well to coincide with a light season at work and my grandfather's birthday. I was just four days out from being a Gemini and my actual due date was a bit more than a week later.

posted February 19, 2010 07:00 AM         

he has saturn at the asc tho
but many stuff in 5h im sure he ll be a musician ! also venus and jupiter in 6th point to that!

here is his chart