posted March 19, 2010 07:27 AM         

a lot of people born around that time period.

also I don't think any astrological alignment makes anybody born. I believe an astrological alignment is synchronicity with somebody being born.

any ways...a lot of people were born around that period...especially if you count 20 year deviation.

any ways..if transneptunian dwarf planet,Pluto is used in these cycles and is valid, I don't see why its fellow transneptunian dwarf planets, Makemake and Haumea aren't valid to use to check cycles.
I don't see why the transneptunian dwarf planet candidates, Sedna,2007 OR10 "Snow White", Orcus, Quaoar,Varuna,and Ixion aren't valid to check cycles.

Skeptics of Astrology would say that we can easily see patterns if we look hard for it. It's kinda like how a person can see patterns in tea leaves.

I do believe astrological cycles are meaningful, but if Pluto cycles are valid, then the cycles of its neighbors would seem valid too, especially Eris which is larger than Pluto.

I am going to check those out starting with the outer planets in conjunction to Eris.
The next Uranus-Eris conjunction is June 8, 2016, then September 25, 2016, and March 16, 2017. That's referring to exact conjunctions.

Raymond

------------------
"Nothing matters absolutely;
the truth is it only matters relatively"

posted March 19, 2010 07:54 AM         

Pluto and Uranus were exactly conjunct on 3114 BC on 29-November 3114 BC, on 21.5 Capricorn, the Axis of Earthquakes starting point.

Do you know any dates when Pluto, ERIS and SEDNA were conjunct?