posted January 05, 2011 09:22 PM            

I Think this is basicaly telling me that my emotions are getting raped by people left and right...my feminine side is obviously first and foremost represented by the mother, oh and the fact my mom was willing just means i'm letting my emotional resources fly out all around me. I think I also could be draining others emotions..I don't know.

The venus of wellendorf wa sthe first archtype recorded in history of a woman manifested in art...she is the big prego mother...

the mother is the first female archthype, any other archtyp eis below the mother.

That is a scientific fact, proven by demonstratable evidence, every culture, divine efeminism beings wiht mother...

there is no way there can be a son or daughter, without a mother.

A sister, a witch, any lady is first and foremost a daughter, or mother. Then the other things.

same witha guy....the father is the source of all archtype.....ther eis really only two archtypes...
father and mother...everything else is a reflection or refraction of this

a part of he father, a seed of the father, a part of the mother a seed of the mother, a part of the daughter....

hope this helps you out when your dealing with the dimension of archtypes...

archtypes i believe are the key to explaining astrology logicaly.

archtypes occupy a higher reality than us.

Archtypes are more real than us, we are there manifestation. If your father had no notion of father you would not be alive...

archtypes aare immortal they never die, and they evolve and meet all the scientific criteria for a living organism.

they expound waste
they undergow cellular transformation, after all we are cells....it's already been proven, peopl ein teh same area have the same dreams but through different rose colored or black sun shades.

IT's true that hte idea of father is a living breathing organism which is above us..but below the one.

the two first ar emother and father......that is the order...this is all science, not conjecture.

This has been proven by studing cultures in isolated regions that have no contact with each other, but develop similarly, as in how we are 99.9 perecent the same geneticaly, we are also 99.9 percent the same culturaly, as one leads to teh other.

if aliens saw us we would all look the same, like squirels, but wiht different spots.

these are the scientific facts which have lead people like stephen hawkings to re-assess the notion that there is no god-head, or creator....you don't have to be a genius to know this...shamans who smoke weed every day and take psychedelics know this, and so do the indigenous people.

it's sad that science has become a black art in a way, only focusing on what is econmic and profitable, in a sense science is actually dead, although teh scientific method is nice, but it's been playgerized and has been with man since the dawn of time...i would even go so far as to say that churches are more scientific that scientists...

and i would even say that atheism is a metnal disorder. Sorry...if it's not a mental disorder that what is your reason for loving, and i you hav eno reason for loving, then how come your telling us that your idea of reasons for things with regards to science is the reaosn you love, but then you say you don't have a reason for loving?

it's not possible, if your an theist, you have to have a reason to love, or you can't, there is no such thing as faith for you, which is the definition of doing things reasonless. An atheist doesn't have faith, and therefore can never do a thing without a reason.

that's why i don't trust there machivilian natures, ends justify the means, and even when they know deep down inside they shouldn't, they ellude to evolution and survival of the fittest.

I'm also very dissapointed with people claiming that true christians, and true reliious and spiritual adepts have committed atrocities in the name of God. That is not true...the religious leaders were essentialy politicians and scientists who pretended to believe in the religion so taht they coul dcontrol the masses.

I'm not against the scientific method. I'm agianxst the religion and creed of the dark occult art of science itself as known to modern man. I use the scientific method every day, and so did cavemen...although it had a different name....