Posts: 1
From:
Registered: Jul 2011

posted July 17, 2011 10:53 AM            

---

Has anyone found that the sideral method of calculating the birthchart is in any way more accurate than the tropical method? I would be a completely different sign which came a s quite a shock....it's not me at all!
Would black moon lilith be different then? I haven't found it in my sidereal chart calculator

IP: Logged

Posts: 804
From: India
Registered: Mar 2011

posted July 17, 2011 10:55 AM            

---

WELCOME

IP: Logged

Posts: 601
From:
Registered: Dec 2010

posted July 17, 2011 12:19 PM            

---

Everything would be in different signs (mostly... unless you have a lot of planets in the late degrees). This includes BML, unless your tropical BML is after the 25th degree.

IP: Logged

Posts: 388
From:
Registered: Oct 2010

posted July 17, 2011 12:47 PM            

---

more details pros and cons, please

IP: Logged

Posts: 831
From:
Registered: May 2011

posted July 17, 2011 09:18 PM            

---

was just looking at mine yesterday. libra and aries stellium

IP: Logged

Posts: 195
From: Pretoria, Gauteng,South Africa
Registered: May 2009

posted July 18, 2011 02:22 AM            

---

The aspects stayy the same but the "signs" change.

Mine are:

Sun Sag
Moon Gemini
Mercury Sag
Venus Libra
Mars Virgo
Saturn Libra
Jupiter Sag
Neptune Sag
Uranus Scorpio
Pluto In Libra

Its actually exactly the same as my vedic chart poistions according to jyoti. But the aspects remain unchaged; I still have Sun Neptune conjuction, Sun Jupiter conjunction etc.

IP: Logged

Posts: 831
From:
Registered: May 2011

posted July 18, 2011 03:09 AM            

---

there's no way i have that many libra though. i make decisions very fast. ah but could be the aries sun, venus, merc opposing all that libra. i dunno. it's not similar how you read western tropical right? in vedic i know the moon is very important. mine is "pushya". the nodes become stars or something.

IP: Logged