posted November 26, 2012 08:05 PM            

In this pattern, the planets are split up into two distinct groups and separated by at least two signs, i.e. 60 degrees. There must be a minimum of two planets opposing each other, one from each group, so that the said groups face each other.

See-saw patterns are extremely rare. As a matter of fact, the native is constantly torn between one group or the other. The personality is characterized by a duality that is quite difficult to solve in the beginning because the decision-making process is necessarily tainted by hesitancy, and striking a balance proves quite gruelling. In most cases, as the native matures, the integration of the two separated parts is achieved gradually and more easily if Saturn is strong. Ultimately, the see-saw pattern offers the rich fullness of the two opposite and complementary ends of the personality.

posted November 26, 2012 08:06 PM            

No matter what you call the pattern, you will find two groups of planets opposing each other, as for example two houses with planets opposing three houses with planets; or three houses with planets opposing a similar three houses.

Michael Caine
March 14, 1933, 10:10 a.m. GMT
Rotherhithe, England (51N30, 0W10)
Rodden Rating: B (Biography/Autobiography)

Betty Friedan
February 4, 1921 4:00 a.m. CST
Peoria, IL (40N42, 89W36)
Rodden Rating: AA (Birth certificate, Birth document)

As the word "See-Saw" indicates, with this pattern life can become a balancing act, and you should weigh what is important and what is not, else you may feel that you are sitting on a teeter-totter, always being pulled first in one direction – then in the other. Jansky prefers the word "Hourglass," since he feels the action is a slow shift of emphasis, flowing back and forth in a uniform way like sand in an hourglass, rather than the sudden oscillation of a See-Saw. I have observed both reactions - the quick change as well as the slow shifting of values, ideas or ideals. In my experience, this depends more on interplanetary aspects (especially the ones to Saturn) than on an overall chart pattern.

&&&In the brilliant actor Michael Caine's horoscope, for example, the 4th/10th and 5th/11th house oppositions could indicate the very poor family he was born into, and the very rich circumstances (with a Rolls Royce and chauffeur, a fancy house in London as well as an exclusive Malibu, California hilltop home) he now lives in. It can also be one indicator of the bouts of optimism versus pessimism he is said to suffer from.

The actual opposition or oppositions in the chart can indicate which opposing forces are involved. In Caine's case it is the Sun opposite Jupiter, Venus opposite Jupiter as well as Neptune, and Moon opposite Uranus.

^^^Oppositions always describe the need to react to or against another person. The wish to cooperate with another is pitted against the resentment of needing another. Eventually you become aware (the positive keyword for an opposition) that cooperating does not deplete you, but actually fulfills you by balancing the polarities; as you recognize the lack within, you will gladly reach out to the other and understand how to reconcile the opposing forces or balance the imbalance.

The See-Saw pattern does best in a chart that can withstand ups and downs and not despair when changes are required. You will have a harder time adjusting with a fixed T-square or grand cross than with a predominance of mutable planets which enjoy involvement with others and thrive on versatility; even the cardinal quality which loves constant action is easier than the fixed mode.

Neither Caine nor Freidan suffers from an overload of fixed planets and [they] have learned how to handle the See-Saw quite well. Both found their true calling rather late in life, and went through a major change. Caine was still broke at 29 and had his first real success with [the movie] "Alfie" in 1964 (age 31). Friedan, a psychology major, married in 1947 and after ten years of being "just a housewife and mother," undertook an extensive study of supposed discontent among her peers, which launched her into the revolutionary women's movement and, in 1963, her successful book "The Feminine Mystique." (She was over 40 by then.)