posted May 16, 2013 04:07 PM            

I'm talking about the kind of people who I don't know... just do it right the second they first get round to it, who don't need to learn the basics, whose touch is bliss to any partner etc. Who seem to have been experts in a previous lifetime so in this one they just have to resume

posted May 16, 2013 10:24 PM            

------------------
Passion, Lust, Desire. Check out my journal

posted May 17, 2013 03:26 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by andstuff:
@ Pixie Jane: yes and also even if the person has horrible skin and no skills one can have an AMAZING time with them, have heard this before. I wasn't talking about versatility, I was talking about talent

---

posted May 17, 2013 03:34 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by PixieJane:
So was I. But then versatility is part of that (unless you mean talent with those as YOURSELF rather than the wide variety of preferences & desires out there, many of whom hold very different desires than yourself), so I guess we're working with a different definition of "talent."

---

posted May 17, 2013 04:06 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by PixieJane:
I believe you think you're the standard. You're not. Some like it gentle, others like it rough. What you would find talented others would think sucked. Therefore, unless they're versatile then they suck at making love to someone, no matter how talented you personally find them.

And of course people can vary in what they want day to day, too.

---

let me guess, you don't have any of those aspects so now you're acting like they don't matter?one of my best friends has venus conj mars and oh boy he's just the top expert on everything (which makes me regret he's gay)

posted May 17, 2013 04:30 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by andstuff:
Basically just curious as usual.

I'm talking about the kind of people who I don't know... just do it right the second they first get round to it, who don't need to learn the basics, whose touch is bliss to any partner etc. Who seem to have been experts in a previous lifetime so in this one they just have to resume

Venus/Pluto? Pluto/ASC? Mars/Pluto?

---

When I read your post I immediately thought of the historical so-called "greatest lover" Casanova. I have read a biography on him and he was a man who was literally able to please almost any woman. He lost his virginity while sharing a bed with two sisters...confident from the start! Casanova instinctively knew how to please the individual woman he was with. Astrologically speaking he was an Aries Sun, Scorpio Rising with Venus conjunct Mars in Pisces. An enticing alpha male at first sight with a sensitive and intuitive understanding of the female psyche.

I think that's a pretty lethal combination of placements!

posted May 17, 2013 04:34 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by PixieJane:
I'd think it would depend on what someone wanted as different people love and value very different things when it comes to sexual unions. And sometimes the chemistry is just not there, so I'd think reading composite charts is more important in figuring out how sexually compatible 2 people are than trying to figure out one placement.

If there were a "universal placement" then I'd think it would have to do more with intuition or charisma than eroticism, though I've read that Eros in the 6H is supposed to be this way, and that Eros in Pisces is said to be an erotic chameleon, so maybe 6H Pisces Eros could be "universal," at least for a one night stand assuming it also grants intuition or acute people reading enough and doesn't have to figure out what the other person won't admit to when it comes to likes & dislikes.

---

posted May 17, 2013 04:35 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Maelstrom:
When I read your post I immediately thought of the historical so-called "greatest lover" Casanova. I have read a biography on him and he was a man who was literally able to please almost any woman. He lost his virginity while sharing a bed with two sisters...confident from the start! Casanova instinctively knew how to please the individual woman he was with. Astrologically speaking he was an Aries Sun, Scorpio Rising with Venus conjunct Mars in Pisces. An enticing alpha male at first sight with a sensitive and intuitive understanding of the female psyche.

I think that's a pretty lethal combination of placements!

---

posted May 17, 2013 05:26 AM            

Both signs belong to Mars signs.

posted May 17, 2013 07:55 AM            

------------------
Passion, Lust, Desire. Check out my journal

posted May 17, 2013 08:43 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by jupitersgirl:
Mars in scorpio, jupiter in the 8th house

---

Oh my god I have Jupiter in the 8th as well....

posted May 17, 2013 08:59 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by PixieJane:
I'd think it would depend on what someone wanted as different people love and value very different things when it comes to sexual unions. And sometimes the chemistry is just not there, so I'd think reading composite charts is more important in figuring out how sexually compatible 2 people are than trying to figure out one placement.

If there were a "universal placement" then I'd think it would have to do more with intuition or charisma than eroticism, though I've read that Eros in the 6H is supposed to be this way, and that Eros in Pisces is said to be an erotic chameleon, so maybe 6H Pisces Eros could be "universal," at least for a one night stand assuming it also grants intuition or acute people reading enough and doesn't have to figure out what the other person won't admit to when it comes to likes & dislikes.

---

For intuition I've read quite a bit o astrologers who think Moon in Pisces, esp in a woman, makes for the most universal and adaptable lover. As a female lunar Piscean I can kind of vouch for that--I can morph into whatever my lover wants intuitively. it also can mean that on my side of things, the sex sucks because it's all about him and nothing about me.

There is a lot of truth to what you say about people being different and that one placement isn't enough. Sex is pretty complicated--or at least it is for a lot of people. Maybe not for others. Erotisism can be terribly shallow and for a good number of people, it's not enough to make for a satisfying sexual experience. All the signs have an erotic side, each in their our way, very tellingly, every sign's erotic side is intertwined with how they see intimacy and relating to others. We should look toward that for clues about what makes for a good sexual experience.

posted May 17, 2013 09:15 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by jupitersgirl:
Mars in scorpio, jupiter in the 8th house

---

my boyfriend has both! And yes, he's very gifted .

posted May 17, 2013 09:43 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by PixieJane:
I'd think it would depend on what someone wanted as different people love and value very different things when it comes to sexual unions. And sometimes the chemistry is just not there, so I'd think reading composite charts is more important in figuring out how sexually compatible 2 people are than trying to figure out one placement.

If there were a "universal placement" then I'd think it would have to do more with intuition or charisma than eroticism, though I've read that Eros in the 6H is supposed to be this way, and that Eros in Pisces is said to be an erotic chameleon, so maybe 6H Pisces Eros could be "universal," at least for a one night stand assuming it also grants intuition or acute people reading enough and doesn't have to figure out what the other person won't admit to when it comes to likes & dislikes.

---