Lindaland
  Astrology 2.0
  Nodes

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Nodes
Gemmy
Knowflake

Posts: 679
From:
Registered: Oct 2012

posted March 05, 2014 05:15 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Gemmy     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Why is it that none of the celebrities who are used as examples of soulmate couples or have been together for a long time,have no major nodal conjunctions in synastry?

Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton
Marylin Monroe and Joe DiMaggio(he was pretty infatuated and they were in and off often)
Paul Newman and Joanne Woodward
Patrick Swayze and his wife
Jolie and Pitt

Just to name a few.Why is that?

IP: Logged

ueharaa
Knowflake

Posts: 589
From:
Registered: Sep 2011

posted March 05, 2014 05:33 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for ueharaa     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
This is an old thread in which you can find nodes connections made by famous couple. http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum24/HTML/209853.html

IP: Logged

Gemmy
Knowflake

Posts: 679
From:
Registered: Oct 2012

posted March 05, 2014 05:51 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Gemmy     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I still don't believe you NEED nodal conjunctions for it to be significant.These couples don't have that and they loved.

IP: Logged

ueharaa
Knowflake

Posts: 589
From:
Registered: Sep 2011

posted March 05, 2014 07:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for ueharaa     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Nodal contacts just happen to be extremely common.
From memory, elizabeth taylor and richard burton had vertex node conjunction. Also from memory angelina jolie's mars square brad pitt's node...As the link I provided earlier, many famous couple who were known for being "soulmate like" had nodal contacts (grace kelly and prince rainier, paul mccartney and hiw wife, joanne woodward and paul newman..)
Now no aspect is either "required" for something to be significant or not. We don't make the laws and honestly claiming to have pinpoint the law of attraction and sticking together wouldn't be realistic. All we can do is study as many couple's synastry as possible and look for pattern that repeat over and over again. And angles, axis, luminaries contacts is a huge one coming over and over again in synastry of people who were significant to each other (not necessarily in a romantic way)

IP: Logged

tgem
Knowflake

Posts: 1006
From:
Registered: Jan 2013

posted March 06, 2014 07:54 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for tgem     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Gemmy:
Why is it that none of the celebrities who are used as examples of soulmate couples or have been together for a long time,have no major nodal conjunctions in synastry?

Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton
Marylin Monroe and Joe DiMaggio(he was pretty infatuated and they were in and off often)
Paul Newman and Joanne Woodward
Patrick Swayze and his wife
Jolie and Pitt

Just to name a few.Why is that?


Several famous soulmate couples actually have the square to the nodes in synastry. It's considered a marriage aspect. From my research, I have found conjunctions to the NN in synastry occurs in relationships that usually end.

IP: Logged

lilcool
Knowflake

Posts: 27
From: Earth
Registered: Feb 2014

posted March 06, 2014 09:05 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for lilcool     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I find this interesting, what about vertex trine nodes? Is it valid? or even moon trine vertex

IP: Logged

lilcool
Knowflake

Posts: 27
From: Earth
Registered: Feb 2014

posted March 06, 2014 09:22 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for lilcool     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Tgem I find observation very interesting. What made you arrive at the conclusion? Isnt it supposed to be tje other way round?

quote:
Originally posted by tgem:
Several famous soulmate couples actually have the square to the nodes in synastry. It's considered a marriage aspect. From my research, I have found conjunctions to the NN in synastry occurs in relationships that usually end.

IP: Logged

tgem
Knowflake

Posts: 1006
From:
Registered: Jan 2013

posted March 06, 2014 10:40 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for tgem     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Not necessarily. Check out some celebrity couples: Pitt/Jolie, carter/cash, Taylor/burton, woodward/Newman. There's articles out there about the squares to the nodes. In my experience, as well, relationships, both platonic and romantic that have nodal conjunctions have always ended. Don't forget that a square to the nodal axis, not only touches the NN but someone's SN as well which gives that familiarity/karmic feeling.

IP: Logged

Gemmy
Knowflake

Posts: 679
From:
Registered: Oct 2012

posted March 06, 2014 11:23 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Gemmy     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thank you tgem!

It just kinda annoys me when time and time again Nodal conjunctions are made to seem like everything.I'm not "hating"(I can't believe I just used that word) cause I don't have that,I'm just trying to point out something I've noticed.

IP: Logged

lilcool
Knowflake

Posts: 27
From: Earth
Registered: Feb 2014

posted March 06, 2014 11:29 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for lilcool     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
what would be that gives a relationship staying power in your opinion?
Would you say there needs to be a balance of nn and sn not just one of the other only

quote:
Originally posted by tgem:
Not necessarily. Check out some celebrity couples: Pitt/Jolie, carter/cash, Taylor/burton, woodward/Newman. There's articles out there about the squares to the nodes. In my experience, as well, relationships, both platonic and romantic that have nodal conjunctions have always ended. Don't forget that a square to the nodal axis, not only touches the NN but someone's SN as well which gives that familiarity/karmic feeling.

IP: Logged

tgem
Knowflake

Posts: 1006
From:
Registered: Jan 2013

posted March 06, 2014 01:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for tgem     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Sure nodal connections are significant. Saturn needs to play a huge part though. Saturn is the one with the staying power...both soft and hard aspects.

IP: Logged

tgem
Knowflake

Posts: 1006
From:
Registered: Jan 2013

posted March 06, 2014 01:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for tgem     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by lilcool:
I find this interesting, what about vertex trine nodes? Is it valid? or even moon trine vertex

Anything that hits the vertex will seem very fated. The vertex, like the ASC is a very sensitive point. It does not necessarily mean the connection will last, however. But it would indicate a fated...significant relationship.

IP: Logged

lilcool
Knowflake

Posts: 27
From: Earth
Registered: Feb 2014

posted March 06, 2014 08:15 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for lilcool     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
thanks tgem you are a great help! one last question-I thought for contacts to vertex only conjunctions apply amd not trines

quote:
Originally posted by tgem:
Anything that hits the vertex will seem very fated. The vertex, like the ASC is a very sensitive point. It does not necessarily mean the connection will last, however. But it would indicate a fated...significant relationship.

IP: Logged

Moonfish
Moderator

Posts: 4293
From: Tropical Ocean
Registered: Jul 2011

posted March 06, 2014 08:49 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Moonfish     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by tgem:
Several famous soulmate couples actually have the square to the nodes in synastry. It's considered a marriage aspect. From my research, I have found conjunctions to the NN in synastry occurs in relationships that usually end.

I agree

IP: Logged

Mystic_Cat
Knowflake

Posts: 69
From: Jupiter, Pluto & Sol
Registered: Jan 2014

posted March 06, 2014 11:31 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mystic_Cat     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
You don't have to have Node conjunctions to be connected with someone, of course it is a major help in the relationship but the node is just your soul goal and the position of your Draconic Node (Head and Bodys lunar node position)

------------------
2012 AD ^ The Age of Aquarius.

IP: Logged

tgem
Knowflake

Posts: 1006
From:
Registered: Jan 2013

posted March 07, 2014 07:43 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for tgem     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by lilcool:
thanks tgem you are a great help! one last question-I thought for contacts to vertex only conjunctions apply amd not trines


Well yes, conjunctions would obviously be felt the most. But don't discount an opposition or square...maybe a trine..especially if the orb is very tight/exact..

IP: Logged

Ceridwen
Knowflake

Posts: 11046
From:
Registered: Jul 2011

posted March 07, 2014 09:22 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ceridwen     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
A square might actually be the strongest glue, as it is at the balance point of both nodes (granted the balance might be created by a certain tension).

I can`t confirm that conjunctions to the NN always lead to break up though

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright 2000-2014

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a